Well, I'm still at school, and I always state my beliefs openly, and I've always gotten the top grade for writing formally, however, I got cited for racism for calling Africans "Chronically poor", and in a state of "Perpetual destitution and exploitation", both comments referred to the state of Africa's economy and the effects of colonialism on Africa's economy.
I've tried arguing with my teacher, but he still cited me for racism, but I want to ask you, are those comments REALLY RACIST?
I see nothing racist in them.
Oh yes, I am truly sorry if I have offended anyone reading this.
I've heard about (and personally experienced) example, after example, after example like this. The "pro-diversity" left, which already has a carefully crafted stranglehold on the flow of information in this country, shouldn't be citing
anyone for racism, real or imagined-it's called the 1st Amendment...just ask these very same people when they're defending pedophiles, flag-burners, terrorists, and pornographers and you'll get an earful about how even ugly speech is a sacred right. Or, to use their own terminology from when they defend their "right" to abuse their position for partisan brainwashing, "academic freedom."
This is why there is a movement in this country for a student's bill of rights (imagine their reaction if we took it one step further and applied their racist Affirmative Action logic to
academic diversity).
Ever heard about that case in Colorado where the girl was flunked out of a class for defying her professor's instructions to write a paper on why Bush is a war criminal, and instead writing one on why it was
Saddam who was the war criminal? How about what happens to anyone in science departments who admits to having creationist views (even those who also accept evolution)? Or how about the "enlightened," "pro-tolerance" liberals who charged the stage, overturned the lecturn, and assaulted the Minute Man who came to speak about border security? Shouting down and assaulting conservatives like ignorant, emotional apes must be what liberals mean by "free exchange of ideas."
From my book:
I was once told in a writing class that I had to re-write a paper because my views on abortion were “wrong.” I was forced to watch Outfoxed for four separate Freshman-level classes, two of which had nothing to do with politics or the news media. Only once was anything involving the other side of the story even offered, and not even once was the propaganda flick’s wildly erroneous claims confronted or questioned. I also had a political science instructor who constantly emailed us petty, vicious anti-Sarah Palin talking points throughout Election 2008, on everything from her home town to her wardrobe. My freshman public speaking instructor also routinely peddled pro-Obama talking points and went on rants about how only oblivious, hysterical “elderly people” oppose legalizing marijuana while “those who live in reality” support it. It was everywhere you went. Just walking into a professor’s office meant navigating through a carnival of angry anti-conservative, anti-U.S. signs, cartoons, and propaganda.
Seriously, you need to go to the link below and report this obscenely biased BS...it's the only way it will ever be stopped. Consider how many months and how many tens of thousands of enraged emails it took to get Ward Churchill's college to even consider reviewing his tenure...as he taught his captive audience that 9/11 victims were as bad as the Nazis. Confrontation is the only thing that even puts a dent in the left's production rate at these completely unaccountable liberalism factories.
Accuracy in Academia
As with most things involving liberals, their logic on this exactly backwards. They identify racism (Affirmative Action) as equality and equality (being able to point out poverty regardless of who is being talked about) as racism.
