Their assumptions are not guesses. They are observed scientific facts such as the nuclear half life of uranium used in radiometric dating. A scientist knows for a fact how long it will take uranium to become lead. He then compares the amount of lead to the amount of uranium in a sample and determines the age of the sample.Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
Yes, they do use the information they can observe, but they are not "assuming" the movements of lights and planets. They observed how fast they are moving and came to a logical conclusion on what caused them to move. The Big Bang is their best hypothesis so far on why the universe acts as it does.How about the big bang in the first place? How did they "prove" that? By looking into a telescope and assuming the movements of lights and planets and assumed explosion and end result to "predict" the creation of the universe as seen in our own narrow perspectives?
Originally Posted by SWM
2001-2008: Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
2009-2016: Dissent is the highest form of racism.
2017-? (Probably): Dissent is the highest form of misogyny.
Europe is illegally occupied by the US
several hours worth of seminars which dispute the "theory" of evolution-
Creation Science Evangelism | Browsing Media Categories