I would like to see the one person who voted "No" to post their reason why.
Do you consider Hiroshima a patriotic and necessary act?I really don't see how a suicide bomber blowing themselves up in a civilian setting can be seen as anything other than a terrorist.
I really don't see how a suicide bomber blowing themselves up in a civilian setting can be seen as anything other than a terrorist.
Do you consider Hiroshima a patriotic and necessary act?
I would like to see the one person who voted "No" to post their reason why.
So maybe that is how some others think of suicide bombing...I think it is a horrible vile disgusting act that had to be done.
Hypothetical:
The USA is invaded by the USSR in 1985. The USSR manages to capture some of the west coast, but the war is still raging on. Are Americans who kill collaborators terrorists?
I really don't see how a suicide bomber blowing themselves up in a civilian setting can be seen as anything other than a terrorist.
The group this guy runs with will see him as fulfilling his duty to his religion. He is fighting for the freedom of his brothers, friends, and neighbors. Thus, a freedom fighter.
A freedom fighter using terrorism, he/she is still a terrorist.
But not to his brothers/sisters-in-arms. They are not going to see him as a terrrorist. They are going to see the cause they are fighting against as the terrorism.
A freedom fighter using terrorism, he/she is still a terrorist.