Obviously! It should carry MMS and strict for 2nd++ offense..
Yah, first fine, then jail, mild jail time.
Caucasian male - the new minority
Fiscally conservative, socially moderate.
COMMITING adultery means a lack of morals and values.
There is a clear and distinct difference here. One can easily find adultery immoral while not believing it is an offense punishable by incarceration.
An example of a related concept is someone repeatedly calling there spouse a "worthless pile of dog****". In my opinion, this is proof that the person making the comment lacks morals or values.
But, me not thinking it should be illegal and punishable by incarceration to repeatedly call one's spouse a "worthless pile of dog****" is not evidence that I approve of committing the action or find it moral.
The fallacy you are engaging in here is that you are trying to suggest a causal factor in the results without anything but loose correlational data and subjective interpretation. It also fails to note that Breech of Contract is NOT a criminal offense. The only most severe penalties regarding breech of contract are monetary in nature.
So, the question being posed is not "Should adultery be a criminal offense punishable by Jail time" it is "Should breech of marriage contract be a criminal offense"
This is asinine to the extreme.
The question asks that the marriage contract be treated differently than ALL other contracts.
All adultery can ever be is a breech of the marriage contract. No more, no less. It is no worse than verbally degrading one's partner incessently to produce the grounds for cruelty, but verbal abuse is no crime as it is protected under the first ammendemnt. But verbal abuse has just as many, if not MORE, negative emotional ramifications and is just as immoral as adultery does.
One does not gain "morality" by forcing it upon otehrs through laws and other coercive methods. One is moral if they themselves do not engage in despicable behaviors such as verbal abuse or adultery.
Redefining contract law to make breech of contract a criminal offense just to enforce one's own morality would create a very dangerous precedent.
You are assuming incorrectly, based on no actual evcidence besides what you have effectively invented on your own, that answering "no" to the question implies or reflects a lack of morality.
Had the question been: "Should there be an increase in monetary damages awaerded to the injurder party when a divorce is caused by adultery" then I would have said "Yes. It is a breech of contract and thus, contract law stipulates that an award for monetary dmages should be rendered".
The assumption it reflects a lack of morality to say that adultery should not be a criminal offense is absolutely incorrect.
Now if you want to argue that contract law should be altered in general so that ALL breeches of contract should be potential criminal offenses, that would be another issue entirely.
Because that is the ONLY way to intelligently argue that Adultery should be a criminal act, and it would require a complete top to bottom reformation of contract law.
I suppose that one could also argue that laaws regarding breach of the marriage contract alone should be reformed so that it is treated as a criminal offense.
But it should be noted that such a reformation would create a first ammendment issue given the verbal abuse example I have described above, as well as create a dangerous precednet based on other potential breeches of the marriage contract/ marital vows relating to "Honor, cherish and obey" or whatever terms are used in the vow exchange.
Imagine a world were any person who is in the heat of the moment during an argument with their spouse and says the word "bitch" or "asshole" can be tried and prosecuted for breech of contract.
Last edited by Tucker Case; 02-11-09 at 11:08 AM.
Tucker Case - Tard magnet.
I voted no. No way do I want government to interfere in my private affairs even more than it already does.
Just a question to those who think it's a great idea:
Who's gonna take care of Mommy and/or the kids while Daddy rots in prison for a few months?
All you're going to accomplish by making adultery illegal is an initial massive surge in divorces followed by a much lower marriage rate. People will simply not get married anymore and will raise their kids out of wedlock. I'm sure that's going to be GREAT for families everywhere.
Prohibition is NEVER the answer.
"Yes, but are you a Protestant atheist or a Catholic atheist?".- Northern Irish joke
Just stone the woman to death every time
And throw ten stone at the man..
Works every time, doesn't it.
Adultery never happens in the peaceful Islamic lands, but it is rife in America, and we must do something about these heinous crimes..
I was, however, addressing this claim:
Would you like me to address the claim you referred to also?
Last edited by Jerry; 02-11-09 at 01:47 PM.
Never mind the credible research demonstrating that children are worse off in single parent homes. Never mind that statistics showing that they are more likely to be abused sexually, physically and emotionally by mommy’s boyfriends. No no, Tucker says none of this exists, so it must be true because he said so; and Tucker is always right, just ask him, he'll tell you.
Adultery destroys the family, the destruction of the family harms everyone immediately involved directly and society by proxy and that is why it is wrong.
It's not my morality; it's not your morality, its objective truth which, yes, does actually exist.
Your argument is born of gross ignorance and utter denial of documented facts. I can't address it comprehensively as I would have to start with basic sociological concepts which I neither have the time or patents to type nor the casual reader to digest.
You couldn't be more wrong, Tucker. Adultery is so much more than a simple breach of a contract.
Jerry, do you think your wife should have gone to jail?
Originally Posted by Jerry