• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is this a cool building?

Is the [b]North Korean[/b] building nice/cool?

  • Yes, one of the nicest/coolest buildings I have seen..

    Votes: 15 16.1%
  • Yes, definetely..

    Votes: 28 30.1%
  • Its ok..

    Votes: 12 12.9%
  • Nothing special..

    Votes: 5 5.4%
  • Nah, not nice/cool

    Votes: 26 28.0%
  • Something else(explain)...

    Votes: 7 7.5%

  • Total voters
    93
How about just answering the question.

Looking at the picture and judging the building as looking cool or not, should not require you to know what it is for..

Its intended as a hotel I believe.

I base "cool" on what technological innovations it incorporates.

A picture alone means absolutely nothing.

What is the building? As in, who owns it, what is it for, where is it, what challenges were involved in building it, what unique qualities does the building have, etc.
 
It's a building. What are buildings for?

poster28499211.jpg
 
I base "cool" on what technological innovations it incorporates.

A picture alone means absolutely nothing.

What is the building? As in, who owns it, what is it for, where is it, what challenges were involved in building it, what unique qualities does the building have, etc.

Why do you think the OP asks the questio and list a picture?

It doesnt add a list of ownership and list of technological innovations. It lists the picture only for you to judge the exterior.
 
Why do you think the OP asks the questio and list a picture?

It doesnt add a list of ownership and list of technological innovations. It lists the picture only for you to judge the exterior.

Judge books by their covers much?
 
Sometimes yes. I often buy a book by its cover actually. On the cover there is a title of the book, the author and often a summary.

Ok, so how about giving us the "title" of this building, the "author" of this building, and perhaps a summery of this building?
 
Ok, so how about giving us the "title" of this building, the "author" of this building, and perhaps a summery of this building?

The summary of the building is what you see, the author is North Korea and the title is a "tall building".
 
The summary of the building is what you see, the author is North Korea and the title is a "tall building".

No I mean what it actually is :roll:

The website you got that image from isn't in English, soooo....
 
Last edited:
People, just answer the ****ing poll.
People have been taught that NK is not cool, so therefor the building can not be cool. that's it. "it's all about location not the building"
 
People have been taught that NK is not cool, so therefor the building can not be cool. that's it. "it's all about location not the building"

Frustratingly it seems like this to me... At the time I made this thread, I also made an identical one for the "empire state building", which was massivly favourable and never questioned anything like is being done in this thread.
 
People have been taught that NK is not cool, so therefor the building can not be cool. that's it. "it's all about location not the building"

NK not cool ..building, super cool :mrgreen:
 
Why mention the location of the building? IS this some sort of attempt to see if people's opinion about the building will be influenced by the fact the DPRK is ran by a brutal communist dictator Or is this some attempt to see if we are going to say "man, them thar north Koreans sure know how to make thems perty buildings, I guess them commies aren't that bad"?
I think the building is probably located somewhere in the free world and he wanted to get negative answers or it could be just a computerized sketch and he is trying to organize people not to approve it
 
Last edited:
The building is ****ing ugly, even though it looks ok in the picture you provided. Here is a close up for the building.

ryugyong-hotel.jpg


And a youtube movie
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7nph3Wrd1g&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube- Ryugyong Hotel[/ame]
 
It's a hotel?

**** that, building sux.


Now see if it were a casino integrated into a few city blocks of high-tech nightlife and sin, well then it would PWN.

But a hotel? Nah **** that.
 
Last edited:
The building is ****ing ugly, even though it looks ok in the picture you provided. Here is a close up for the building.

ryugyong-hotel.jpg


And a youtube movie
YouTube- Ryugyong Hotel

Do you know how many nuns he had to grind up to make that thing???

If it is in North Korea...nice to know that while 200k a year die of starvation they can still take time to stop...and smell the roses...
 
The building is ****ing ugly, even though it looks ok in the picture you provided. Here is a close up for the building.
And here is world trade center during construction:
wtc_1938.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom