Us pro rights advocates have no hidden agenda-I believe federal gun bans are unconstitutional and any weapon civilian employees of the government can use-I should be able to own as well. When we achieve that parity, then we can talk about crew served heavy weapons or artillery but small arms are clearly protected. And that freedom trumps whether or not unconstitutional laws would make us safer.
The ARCs arguments are based on a false premise-they pretend that public safety motivates them. We all know how bogus that is given they push for laws that have absolutely no relevance to making us safer-such as opposing CCW licenses etc. Since the ARCs cannot be honest with what causes them to push gun bans we will never have a reasonable debate with them.
Last edited by Goobieman; 01-26-09 at 12:35 PM.