Shewter
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 1,995
- Reaction score
- 684
- Location
- Puget Sound
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Should any prison be closed?
No.
No.
i'm in for that :usflag2:Yes, we should give them to the Euros to look after, like they've offering to do. Then we could set up some sort of system to release detainees who are innocent and, of course, never release anyone who has plotted against the US.
Yes, we should give them to the Euros to look after, like they've offering to do. Then we could set up some sort of system to release detainees who are innocent and, of course, never release anyone who has plotted against the US.
GITMO should be closed, the Military Commissions Act should be repealed and Habeas Corpus needs to be strengthened. What type of country do we live in when our government throws people in a foreign prison in secret, without charges, and tortures them? This state is not America; it’s more like Nazi-Germany or Stalin’s Russia. I hope ‘what do we do with the detainees’ is not the only reason holding us back from demanding justice.
Good thing that, unlike yourself, most people are sensible.:no:
Europe is run by cowards and fools. I wouldn't trust our "allies" to run a hot dog stand, let alone, be in charge of the world's most dangerous terrorists.
Brilliant plan! :roll:I think we should release them only in the communities of any politician who voted against Gitmo, the Patriot Act, troop funding, the war, or who has trashed the troops or declared the war lost as it was being won.
So the neighbors of these politicians in these communities you want to release the prisoners into are not innocent? Talk about logic!That way it would no longer be just innocent Americans who get slaughtered by absolutist Democrat stupidity and treason.
Good thing that, unlike yourself, most people are sensible.
Brilliant plan!
So the neighbors of these politicians in these communities you want to release the prisoners into are not innocent? Talk about logic!
Pulling troops out of Iraq to accomodate terrorists who just murdered and maimed 2,000 of your citizens (Spain), is not sensible. Revealing intelligence confirming that Saddam was an urgent threat only to turn around and refuse to participate in his removal simply because he owes you money (France, Germany) is not sensible.
Handing over the world's most dangerous terrorists to people with such notoriously bad judgment is perfectly sensible. Sorry you can't comprehend that.
:shrug:
So, advocating putting the terrorists Democrats release only in their neighborhoods so that someone other than just innocent Americans can pay the price for Democrat treason and stupidity is claiming that no one in those neighborhoods are innocent?
Way to think it through there, Sparky. :bravo:
Yeah, let's just release them into the communities of people you do not like. Sorry you cannot grasp the foolishness of that decision.
Stick me with me on this one. You said this:
That way it would no longer be just innocent Americans who get slaughtered by absolutist Democrat stupidity and treason.
If we put terrorists into the communities of Democrats who voted against the Patriot Act, the war, etc., then innocents would be dying of YOUR stupidity. Well done.
There are plenty of people I don't like, who I would never propose releasing terrorists in the neighborhoods of. But since liberals are always the ones rooting for terrorists and trying to release them
while never actually having to be the ones to pay the price for their treason and stupidity, it should be them and their families who have to endure the costs, not the rest of the people, who are generally intelligent enough to oppose such lunacy.
You almost got it right. What would actually happen is that, instead of Democrats releasing terrorists and everyone else having to suffer, the same terrorists would still be released, only they would be released in areas far more likely to impact the imbeciles who thought releasing them sounded like a good idea.
Never close it; let the terrorists go when the WOT is over.
aquapub sorry for that, I got scared. I went on a rant...
forgive me for that misunderstanding i shouldve made sure I knew exactly what you are saying. :Oopsie
No harm, no foul. :beer:
Which ones are they? Are they buddies with the ones that have already been released to kill again?So hold them indefinitely? What about the ones in Gitmo who are not terrorists? :2wave:
Which ones are they? Are they buddies with the ones that have already been released to kill again?
Freed to kill again...you could argue that Benazir Bhutto might well be alive today if only Abdullah Mehsud had not been let loose from Guantanamo, where he plainly belonged, regardless of what the bleaters and hand-wringers thought about that.
But, as our Washington man James Gordon Meek today reports, Mehsud convinced somebody in charge down Gitmo way that he was naught but some poor innocent swept up in the fog of war and unjustly jugged. Such a big meanie the U.S. government was for persecuting so harmless a fellow. And so he went free, one of about 450 Gitmo detainees disimprisoned in the past few years.
That was merely one example. What if the slimy bastard killed you or someone that you knew? And Bhutto was an important figure, wasn't she?So 450 are released and you have one that ended up killing someone? :doh
Really? They are always rooting for terrorists? The Liberal argument is that there are people in Gitmo who are NOT terrorists. Maybe you should read up on that.
Treason? It's hardly treasonous to want a fair trial to be had for those in Gitmo.
Your partisan blinders are absurd.
They would also harm people who had no involvement with the Democrats.
Simply more partisan hatred.
:roll: What a hypocrite! Every single time anyone disagrees with you aquapub and gets heated up, they are just crazy liberals who can't do nothing but rant and rave and have no comprehension of what you are talking about. Yet, when one of your own does it, it's all good.
It was an honest misunderstanding by someone with an IQ above single-digits, who apologized. That's nothing like being grilled by ignorant half-wits who blame you for their mistakes and refuse to admit when they are wrong.
Nice try.
That was merely one example. What if the slimy bastard killed you or someone that you knew? And Bhutto was an important figure, wasn't she?
So 450 are released and you have one that ended up killing someone? :doh
Again I ask, would you rather we just keep them all locked up? That way, innocent people get screwed but you sleep soundly at night?