• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The difference between the Palestinians' situation and apartheid is?

The difference between the Palestinians' situation and apartheid is?

  • Africans are peaceful, non-violent people who would never launch qassam rockets.

    Votes: 2 66.7%

  • Africans do not know enough about physics to construct qassam rockets.

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Africans have rights. Palestinians are sub-humans, like cattle, who have no rights.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    3
Palestinains arent Israeli citizens...?
 
Goobieman said:
Palestinains arent Israeli citizens...?
Click to expand...

Lol. I guess neither were South Africans. Which kinda would make them the same in Opinion Eater's world.
 
Onion Eater said:
Definition: Crime of apartheid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...
Fine!

You want to be semantical about this, have it your way...

The crime of collective punishment -
Collective punishment is the punishment of a group of people as a result of the behaviour of one or more other individuals or groups. The punished group may often have no direct association with the other individuals or groups, or direct control over their actions. In times of war and armed conflict, collective punishment has resulted in atrocities, and is a violation of the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions. Historically, occupying powers have used collective punishment to retaliate against and deter attacks on their forces by resistance movements (e.g. by destroying whole villages where attacks have taken place).
Click to expand...
 
The Israelis would like to end the Palestinian's intransigence in the matter of recognition of Israel and right of return so that the Palestinians can get their own nation and then the two nations would be able to live side by side in peace.
 
The difference between the Palestinians' situation and apartheid is?


The Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are on a reservation, which is not to be confused with the bigoted or racist apartheid practiced by the black stone idolatrous moon-god cult, as is articulated by some Satanic Verses in the moon-god cult’s “holy” book. When so-called Palestinians there stop being savages supporting barbarian black stone idolaters who talk to rocks and trees to find Jews to kill, the Palestinians will be closer to having a Nation. They could have had that Nation before 1948 at 1948, and up to 1967, if the swat to leaks had the guts of men to declare independence and establish their borders when they had them. The subservient dogs of apartheid supporting Arabs (like those who were occupying the West Bank, see Jordan) have never declared independence from their apartheid Islamifascist occupiers who could not accept a Jewish home on earth. See Idiot Dick the Palestinian run; Temple Mount king of the hill abomination, Mecca, apartheid, no Jew or anything other than a Moslem may approach the black stone idol of the moon-god cult.

The Palestinian’s race is the same as all those descended from Abraham, they are Arabs, unless they want to claim I can cut my dick worship like they do and become one? {I see no reason not to **** Palestinians, as they do not bite the heads off their mates like that race on the planet Plant; by all means do not separate yourself from Plants.}

Apartheid only deals with separation, with the first sense of the word dealing only with “race“; Jews cannot separate themselves from Jews.

Separation by political or religious beliefs is self-determination, and is not Apartheid. For a state to maintain its culture requires separation from those that would destroy it. Fecal encephalitic morons who want to eat the Jewish State of Israel have not thought the thing out more than one move. The Kanamits, with certain appetites, love those Multiculturalist morons who do not believe in separation by culture.

It is impossible for Israel to be using Apartheid because they are the Jewish home in the geographic region named by Rome as Palestine and by the Ottoman Empire as Syria.

It is impossible for Zionism to be Apartheid.

Israel would be using Apartheid if they rejected Jews of other races, and that would not be Zionism. Apartheid supporting Palestinians full of hate, and often supporters of squat to leaks with salami bombs up their butts, civilian disguised Islamifascists hoping for idiot polls, who know most “liberals” are brain damaged idiots, often accuse Israel of not having a right to exist because Israel accepts Jews of different races (like cute red headed chicks from Russia) not descended from Abraham.

Since Jews can be of any race, which is actually argued by many so-called Palestinians like Jenin, therefore, the Jewish national home cannot be apartheid.
 
The difference is that the whites came to south Africa and suppressed the blacks, while in Palestine, the Palestinians were the ones whom invaded the Israelis first and then created the situation. The Jews have always had a legitimate demand on the land of Israel, more so than any group in any country. Sure they suppress the invaders and try to drive them out, but comparing this to apartheid is just absurd.
 
By the way, the Poll question is unanswerable based on the choices, since the choices are nothing but skewed and therefore, irrelevant.
 
Red_Dave said:
Isnt that kind of why the situation is comparable to apartheid ?
Click to expand...

No. It's not. Not at all. Black South Africans were stripped of their South African citizenship and returned to the original tribes of South Africa. Palestinians were NEVER Israeli citizens. While there are Palestinians living in Israel who have the same rights as Israelis, black Africans in South Africa had most of their legal rights removed regardless of creed. The schools, hospitals etc. in S.A. were separated by race. To my knowledge while schools attended strictly by Jewish Israelis do exist, there are schools attended by Christians, Muslims AND Jews. The same goes for hospitals. Calling the situation in Israel/Palestine an apartheid simply cheapens the term and simply shows either a lack of understanding of the implications a term like 'apartheid' brings OR a desire to be melodramatic and dishonest when discussing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
 
Last edited:
I disagree totally with black S.Africans being non-violent, Johannesburg did or does have the highest murder rate in the world, mostly killing themselves, we saw the tire burnings on tv--which was they would put someone into a ring of vertical tires and set the tires ablaze. Very violent people killing mostly themselves.

YouTube - Farm murders in South Africa Part 1 of 2
 
Red_Dave said:
Isnt that kind of why the situation is comparable to apartheid ?
Click to expand...

No. That is precisely why it isn't. Palestinians do not live in Israel. Blacks affected by apartheid did live in South Africa. Logistically, completely different situations. This is why apartheid does not and has not ever applied to the ME situation.
 
GOP Socialist Soldier said:
I disagree totally with black S.Africans being non-violent.
Click to expand...

I know that they are very violent people. I was being sarcastic when I included that answer. I'm stunned that anybody actually believes that they are non-violent but - so far - two people have chosen this response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom