• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which is Islam's Main Goal: To Captivate, Convert or Kill Us?

Which is Islam's Main Goal: To Captivate, Convert or Kill Us?

  • Captivate

    Votes: 6 9.4%
  • Convert

    Votes: 24 37.5%
  • Kill

    Votes: 14 21.9%
  • None of the Above

    Votes: 27 42.2%
  • Other (Specify)

    Votes: 9 14.1%

  • Total voters
    64
You're lucky.
Given that what they WANT to give us is large smoking craters where our cities once stood... only getting gout IS pretty lucky.
 
:doh

So made an assumption about all atheists based on one? He probably said "I'll quit" because debating creationists is pointless. No amount of facts can sway their beliefs.

When you explain to me the change in state that caused that thing which could not let light escape to bang instead of leak to death, I will be more inclined to accept your Baptist claim that we are “once saved, always saved,“ and the notion that human faith is more unbreakable than Satan‘s faith.

All we need to do is get Obama to just sit down and talk to Satan, as its faith is more breakable than Creationist faith.
 
Islam killed my father, and raped my mother!

FGMrGriffinGoesToWashington.jpg
 
Given that what they WANT to give us is large smoking craters where our cities once stood... only getting gout IS pretty lucky.

I agree. What has Islam given to the civilization? What has the Judeo-Christian philosophy given to civilization?

The comparison is not only laughable, but downright bordering on mentally ill to suggest that Islam and Christianity and Judaism are comparable. All one has to do is look at a list of Jewish and Christian Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, Science, Literature, Music, etc, and there is no argument. Present and argument........that's really funny.
 
Last edited:
The comparison is not only laughable, but downright bordering on mentally ill to suggest that Islam and Christianity and Judaism are comparable. All one has to do is look at a list of Jewish and Christian Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, Science, Literature, Music, etc, and there is no argument. Present and argument........that's really funny.

The more you know!
 

Arab/Islamic NOBEL Winners
(19.6% of World's Population 1.2 billion Muslims)

Literature
1957 Albert Camus
1988 - Najib Mahfooz
Peace
1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1994 - Yaser Arafat
Cemistry
1990 Elias James Corey
1999 - Ahmed Zewail
Medicine
1960 Peter Brian Medawar
1998 Ferid Mourad


JEWISH NOBEL WINNERS
(0.2% OF WORLD'S POPULATION 14.1 Million Jews)

Literature
1910 - Paul Heyse
1927 - Henri Bergson
1958 - Boris Pasternak
1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 - Nelly Sachs
1976 - Saul Bellow
1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 - Elias Canetti
1987 - Joseph Brodsky
1991 - Nadine Gordimer
World Peace
1911 - Alfred Fried
1911 - Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 - Rene Cassin
1973 - Henry Kissinger
1978 - Menachem Begin
1986 - Elie Wiesel
1994 - Shimon Peres
1994 - Yitzhak Rabin
Chemistry
1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 - Henri Moissan
1910 - Otto Wallach
1915 - Richard Willstaetter
1918 - Fritz Haber
1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
1961 - Melvin Calvin
1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
1972 - William Howard Stein
1977 - Ilya Prigogine
1979 - Herbert Charles Brown
1980 - Paul Berg
1980 - Walter Gilbert
1981 - Roald Hoffmann
1982 - Aaron Klug
1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
1985 - Jerome Karle
1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 - Robert Huber
1989 - Sidney Altman
1992 - Rudolph Marcus
2000 - Alan J. Heeger
Economics
1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 - Simon Kuznets
1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
1976 - Milton Friedman
1978 - Herbert A. Simon
1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 - Franco Modigliani
1987 - Robert M. Solow
1990 - Harry Markowitz
1990 - Merton Miller
1992 - Gary Becker
1993 Rober Fogel
Medicine
1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
1908 - Paul Erlich
1914 - Robert Barany
1922 - Otto Meyerhof
1930 - Karl Landsteiner
1931 - Otto Warburg
1936 - Otto Loewi
1944 - Joseph Erlanger
1944 - Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
1952 - Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 - Hans Krebs
1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 - Joshua Lederberg
1959 - Arthur Kornberg
1964 - Konrad Bloch
1965 - Francois Jacob
1965 - Andre Lwoff
1967 - George Wald
1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 - Salvador Luria
1970 - Julius Axelrod
1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
1972 - Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 - David Baltimore
1975 - Howard Martin Temin
1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 - Rosalyn Sussman Yalow
1978 - Daniel Nathans
1980 - Baruj Benacerraf
1984 - Cesar Milstein
1985 - Michael Stuart Brown
1985 - Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 - Gertrude Elion
1989 - Harold Varmus
1991 - Erwin Neher
1991 - Bert Sakmann
1993 - Richard J. Roberts
1993 - Phillip Sharp
1994 - Alfred Gilman
1995 - Edward B. Lewis
Physics
1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
1921 - Albert Einstein
1922 - Niels Bohr
1925 - James Franck
1925 - Gustav Hertz
1943 - Gustav Stern
1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 - Felix Bloch
1954 - Max Born
1958 - Igor Tamm
1959 - Emilio Segre
1960 - Donald A. Glaser
1961 - Robert Hofstadter
1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
1965 - Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 - Julian Schwinger
1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
1971 - Dennis Gabor
1973 - Brian David Josephson
1975 - Benjamin Mottleson
1976 - Burton Richter
1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
1978 - Peter L Kapitza
1979 - Stephen Weinberg
1979 - Sheldon Glashow
1988 - Leon Lederman
1988 - Melvin Schwartz
1988 - Jack Steinberger
1990 - Jerome Friedman
1995 - Martin Perl

Jewish and Muslim Nobel Winners - GupShup Forums
 
:doh

So made an assumption about all atheists based on one? He probably said "I'll quit" because debating creationists is pointless. No amount of facts can sway their beliefs.

Like how you people (not specialy you) make assumptions that all Muslims are based on one
 
Such a sentence as yours in a topic about Islam’s main goal, and not about society (your government), easily looks like you are saying Islam restricts free of speech and does not allow the spread of ideas:

“But there is no problem as long as they dont show hatred or spread their Ideas among society.”

True, I said so, the freedom of speech I meant was in Politics, because freedom of speech in religions is an everlasting circle, and it sometimes leads to sectarian fightings between the citizens of one society, which is the last thing any government wants.In fact I confuses your silence towards Athiests when they mock you or sth.
In Egypt we Have a saying "Brothers, But dont Touch my beliefs" as we got only two main religions in Egypt Islam(Sunni Only) and Chritian(Copts.
And even If that saying wasn't existing, I cant harm a man who believes in God. Athiests are a small percentage in Egypt, Its also restricted "by both Muslims and Christians" to them to spread their Ideas, the moral is that although that Athiests exist here, they cant affect that big religous population .[/quote]

To get a response, a defense, I sometimes will be rude, crude, and socially unattractive. Some people cannot handle that. I applaud you for sticking around to explain things to us.


you won't be the first or the last to do this :2wave:
 
Curiosity Killed The Cat

"Curiosity Killed The Cat"
I talked then to Abdul-Aziz and he told me that he wont get in to any Discussions about religion, "Because I'll quit" he told me .
...
But what did he meant by "I'll quit" ?
Actually I took it as a joke and laughed .
The comment appears to indicate that Abdul-Aziz fears that compelling arguments will diminish his faith.

It is a derivative analogy of the eden allegory; whence, eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge implies swallowing the seeds of doubt.
 
Wages

"Wages"
Ahmed Shaheen said:
Actually we do have Athiests here, But they do respect the religion, because they know if they got in any arguments about religions, They will lose.
Are you implying that they should not lose their head? :mrgreen:
 
Re: Wages

"Wages"
Are you implying that they should not lose their head? :mrgreen:

If its about heads, then his head must be gone since he was Athiest.
 
Re: Curiosity Killed The Cat

"Curiosity Killed The Cat"
The comment appears to indicate that Abdul-Aziz fears that compelling arguments will diminish his faith.

It is a derivative analogy of the eden allegory; whence, eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge implies swallowing the seeds of doubt.

Maybe he didnt like to get into the everlasting circle of beliefs
 
Euphamisms Of Brutality

"Euphamisms Of Brutality"
If its about heads, then his head must be gone since he was Athiest.
That would be hystrionics.
 
Back
Top Bottom