• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for peace ?

Is Israel still seeking for peace ? Read the post below :

  • No

    Votes: 26 37.7%
  • Yes

    Votes: 43 62.3%

  • Total voters
    69
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

You know what term means. Whether you choose to believe it's happening or not doesn't really change what's going on. Whatever sources you have are wrong -- outside of America, most of the world agrees with me. Israel is seen as an aggressor. I'll post some sources soon just to finish with this nonsense.

Most of us seem to understand what the term means, even if you do not.


I didn't back off from the term genocide. It IS a genocide. Israelis are literally killing Palestinians in the streets. There aren't giant ovens, but Israel isn't going to stop until that land is indisputably theirs... And that entails the destruction of the natives.

Genocide is about killing people, not occupying land.

genocide   /ˈdʒɛnəˌsaɪd/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [jen-uh-sahyd] Show IPA Pronunciation

–noun the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.


genocide definition | Dictionary.com

That is very different from a war:

war   /wɔr/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [wawr] Show IPA Pronunciation
noun, verb, warred, war⋅ring, adjective

–noun 1. a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation; warfare, as by land, sea, or air.
2. a state or period of armed hostility or active military operations: The two nations were at war with each other.
3. a contest carried on by force of arms, as in a series of battles or campaigns: the War of 1812.
4. active hostility or contention; conflict; contest: a war of words.



Unless you think that Hitler was conducting a genocide on teh british during the Battle Of Britain or the Americans were conducting genocide against the Japanese, then I would understand your opinion, otherwise your use of the term against the Israelies is simply ludicrous. ;)




Uh, what? Had you added the term, "In Palestine," that'd make sense. But hey, you're allowed to backpeddle on whatever points you'd like.

Nope, in reading all that crap between you two, it was crystal clear that he made perfect sense.
Sorry that you can't or won't accept this simple truth... *shrugs*



I don't care that Israel exists. It's whatever. What bothers me is that they choose to use their might to pick on their neighbor because they feel entitled to more land. That is what's going on.


I think that this simple little research will help you greatly.

History of the Arab–Israeli conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Go to primary source documents and read further, by all means...
But man, you have no freaking idea what you are talking about to this point.


If you don't believe me, you need to do the research.


ORIGIN OF THE ISSUE:

After World War I, the British gained lands in the M.E. that had belonged to the Ottoman Empire since 1520 or so. After 1919, the British Mandate of Palestine, which the League of Nations entrusted to the United Kingdom to administer in the aftermath of World War I, became a Mandate Territory and the U.K. tried to govern fairly so that both the Arabs and the Jews would be able to live peacably together in separate lands.

1. Britain told the Arabs, through Lawrence of Arabia, independence for a united Arab country covering most of the Arab Middle East, in exchange for their supporting the British. This area did not include Palestine.

"I feel it my duty to state, and I do so definitely and emphatically, that it was not intended by me in giving this pledge to King Hussein to include Palestine in the area in which Arab independence was promised. I also had every reason to believe at the time that the fact that Palestine was not included in my pledge was well understood by King Hussein"


The Hussein-MacMahon Correspondence

2. Britain had promised to create and foster a Jewish national home as laid out in the Balfour Declaration, 1917.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

The Balfour Declaration

Tensions were up from the beginning. As tens of thousands of Jews immigrated to the ME, many Arabs started to resent it. Violence ensued as Arabs attacked and killed Jewish civilians over issues like land ownership, and ownership of what grows on the land. Different understandings of ownership and miscommunication coupled with increasing numbers of Jews immigrating and being diplaced by rising anti-semtism over time and into the 1930's and Hitler/Facism say an increase in violence.

WWII had a major effect on the situation in Palestine. During the war, the British forbade entry into Palestine of European Jews escaping Nazi persecution, placing them in detention camps or deporting them to places such as Mauritius.

Following the war, 250,000 Jewish refugees were stranded in displaced persons camps in Europe. Despite the pressure of world opinion, in particular the repeated requests of US President Harry S. Truman and the recommendations of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry, the British refused to lift the ban on immigration and admit 100,000 displaced persons to Palestine. The Jewish underground forces then united and carried out several attacks against the British. In 1946, the Irgun blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of the British administration, killing 92 people.

Seeing that the situation was quickly spiraling out of hand, the British announced their desire to terminate their mandate and to withdraw by May 1948.



III. Independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem, set forth in part III of this plan, shall come into existence in Palestine two months after the evacuation of the armed forces of the mandatory Power has been completed but in any case not later than 1 October 1948. The boundaries of the Arab State, the Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem shall be as described in parts II and III below.

A/RES/181(II)(A+B) of 29 November 1947


The U.N. votes on the creation of two States: one for the Jewish inhabitants of the Palestine Mandate, and a second one for the Arab inhabitants. The Jewish residents accept, but the Arabs and Palestinians refuse the two State solution and the 1948 war is under way.

It is quite clear that the Arabs feel slighted due to a misunderstanding. They were never promised the Palestine area, but they feel that the encroachment of the Jews and the ommishion of Palestine to their territory justifies violence. Gradually, over time, the Israelies have tightened their grip.

I do not want to get into modern policies, nor do I want to talk about the 1967 War or any other until we can nail down and address the root of the issue. If one side or another is operating off of a false premise of righteousness, then that is how we begin to address a solution.


“Israel is the only state in the world today, and the Jews the only people in the world today, that are the object of a standing set of threats from governmental, religious, and terrorist bodies seeking their destruction. And what is most disturbing is the silence, the indifference, and sometimes even the indulgence, in the face of such genocidal anti-Semitism.”

— Canadian Minister of Justice and Attorney General Irwin Cotler





And if you're going to sit there and blame Palestinians for the current drama, answer this question -- why did the occupation start to begin with? Or better yet, answer the question you've dodged twice now -- What were both sides root causes for participating in this conflict? The fact you won't respond to that question says to me that you don't know the answer.

Answered...



I really think you should go and do more background research. I'm not joking.

Neither am I...



And Sir Lion - When you debate with a mod, I guess you should expect a little fanboy-ism, but just so you know, he doesn't really need your support. He's a fine debater, even if he is a little factually mistaken.

Now, you and I can have our own debate if you like, I simply used your discussion with him as a starting point. So, I think I have seen all you have to offer... no evidence and lots of conjecture, but just in case, what else you got?
 
Last edited:
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Stick to the point at hand. You didn't talk about "State Governments". You are changing your argument to fit what you think will help you win a point that you either mis-spoke about or don't understand.

You talked about what happened over a thousand years ago not being relevant to what is happening today. THAT is why you indicated that his analogy was wrong. If you want to make another case or point then fine, acknowledge that on the initial point, he was right and you assessment was wrong. Einstein didn't say E=MC4 and then when called on it, said... no no no, it is E=MC2 and THAT is why I am right and you were wrong. The analogy here was about assessment...

That being said, we are talking about religious leaders in the postion of authority. Governments of any kind are fair game. Theocracy, oligarchy, democracy, military dictatorship, etc. If they are lead by the religious, the his analogy is correct regardless.

Christianity may not actively teach violence, but the Inqusition and the Crusades were EXTREMELY violent actions undertaken in the name of their religion. So were the Salem Witch Trials... as far as affecting percentage of population, the trials were a really big deal. How is that any different than radical Islamists hi-jacking Islam today? It is like you are saying, since there are a billion Chinese and they are an extremely oppressive society that invades and rules innocent Tibet, then Budhists are violent too... the crazy budhist saren gas attacks, etc.

See how far off point I am getting in order to make a point... that is you. Deal with it.

What happened hundreds of years ago doesn't matter. What happens today does. Excusing muslim violence because some Christians did it hundreds of years ago is lame. You can't justify militant Islam because some people did it hundreds of years ago. The Koran teaches violence to further the cause of Islam. That is the point and it is a fact. Christianity does not teach violence to further the cause of Christianity and that is the ponit and it is a fact. Deal with it.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

What happened hundreds of years ago doesn't matter.

Nobody said that it did. Where do you get this stuff?


What happens today does.

Of course...


Excusing muslim violence because some Christians did it hundreds of years ago is lame.

Who is excusing the Muslim violence of today? *looks around*
Nobody here seems to be doing that, at least not Ego or I, that is...



You can't justify militant Islam because some people did it hundreds of years ago.

Who is trying to justify anything? I think that the issue here is that you make huge assumptions and in your zeal to be right you pass them off as logical analysis.



The Koran teaches violence to further the cause of Islam. That is the point and it is a fact.

Debatable... I agree that it talks a lot about violence as a means to further, or protect, Islam.



Christianity does not teach violence to further the cause of Christianity and that is the ponit and it is a fact.

It "teaches" or discusses violence every bit as much as the Qu'ran, it just does so about other topics, in general. THAT is the point that we are making. If you want to contend that Christianity does not teach violence in order to FURTHER its religion, then I might grant you that, but it teaches violence in many other horrible and disgusting ways, and THAT, my friend, is a fact that you continually seem to willfully ignore... to your detriment.



Deal with it.

Stealing my line doesn't make you clever...
It simply shows lack of wit of your own.



EDIT

Ummm... what about post #1049?

http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls...l-still-seeking-peace-105.html#post1057897308
 
Last edited:
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity and the New Testament is the instruction book. Show me where it is taught by Jesus or any of his disciples to carry out violence to further the cause of Christianity. I can show you many passages in the Koran where Muhammed (the founder of Islam) did promote violence to further the cause of Islam. That is not debatable at all. Those are the facts. Also, the Old Testament is not part of Christianity. Saying it is does not make it so. Chrisitans follow the teachings of Jesus. Muslims follow the teachings of Muhammed. Deal with that.
 
Last edited:
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Massive acquisition of new land and occupation was the policy they chose towards that new land.


Security and defense of Israel's borders and population were/are the reasons for the occupation. Land has never been the issue as evidence by Israel returning the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt, and the disengagement and pulling out of most of the settlements in both Gaza and the West Bank. If Israel's focus was new land, the things I mentioned would not have occurred.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity and the New Testament is the instruction book. Show me where it is taught by Jesus or any of his disciples to carry out violence to further the cause of Christianity.

Kill People Who Don't Listen to Priests : Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:12 NLT)

Killing Fortunetellers : "A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller shall be put to death by stoning; they have no one but themselves to blame for their death." (Leviticus 20:27 NAB)

Killing Nonbelievers : "They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman." (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB)
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity and the New Testament is the instruction book. Show me where it is taught by Jesus or any of his disciples to carry out violence to further the cause of Christianity. I can show you many passages in the Koran where Muhammed (the founder of Islam) did promote violence to further the cause of Islam. That is not debatable at all. Those are the facts. Also, the Old Testament is not part of Christianity. Saying it is does not make it so. Chrisitans follow the teachings of Jesus. Muslims follow the teachings of Muhammed. Deal with that.

Apples to apples would be old testament vs Quran (sp?)

Islam just hasnt progressed past that book.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Kill People Who Don't Listen to Priests : Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:12 NLT)

Killing Fortunetellers : "A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller shall be put to death by stoning; they have no one but themselves to blame for their death." (Leviticus 20:27 NAB)

Killing Nonbelievers : "They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman." (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB)

Just a quick note Ahmed, that is not the New Testament in which they were referring to.

:2wave:
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity and the New Testament is the instruction book.
How can he be the founder of something that did not come into being until after he was dead? Christianity was based off of Christ's teaching, but he was hardly the founder.

Show me where it is taught by Jesus or any of his disciples to carry out violence to further the cause of Christianity.
It is not. Again, you choose to be willfully ignorant about the violence your God condoned in the Old Testament. Your religion made mistakes and they have learned from them. So will Islam.

I can show you many passages in the Koran where Muhammed (the founder of Islam) did promote violence to further the cause of Islam.
You tried that once, then Degreez showed up and put you in your place by showing the context of your quotes.

Also, the Old Testament is not part of Christianity. Saying it is does not make it so. Chrisitans follow the teachings of Jesus. Muslims follow the teachings of Muhammed. Deal with that.
Oh really? The OT is not a part of Christianity? Interesting then, that it is in your holy book. :roll:
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity and the New Testament is the instruction book. Show me where it is taught by Jesus or any of his disciples to carry out violence to further the cause of Christianity. I can show you many passages in the Koran where Muhammed (the founder of Islam) did promote violence to further the cause of Islam. That is not debatable at all. Those are the facts. Also, the Old Testament is not part of Christianity. Saying it is does not make it so. Chrisitans follow the teachings of Jesus. Muslims follow the teachings of Muhammed. Deal with that.

Christiananity says to turn the other cheek and look the other way...if it happens again then to strike back like a lion....pretty much sums up what the Israelis did...:2wave:
 
Last edited:
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Kill People Who Don't Listen to Priests : Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:12 NLT)

Your religion allows for women to be stoned to death and for homosexuals to be hung. You have no right to talk.

Killing Fortunetellers : "A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller shall be put to death by stoning; they have no one but themselves to blame for their death." (Leviticus 20:27 NAB)

That is an old testiment rule that have been obsolete for thousands of years. The last time it was really used was in Nazi Germany ... and we all know how that ended.

Killing Nonbelievers : "They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman." (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB)

Not used anymore. We do not require people to join the state religion. Your country does. Again ... you shouldn't be talking. :)

In Iran it is illegal to convert away from Islam. For a man this carries a death sentence; a woman gets life in prision.

In the civilized world, there is no punisment for converting.

The muslim world is not so kind:
The Muslim Bible commands Muslims to murder all non-Muslims:

"O Prophet! Make war against the unbelievers [all non-Muslims] and the hypocrites and be merciless against them. Their home is hell, an evil refuge indeed." (Koran, 9:73)

"When you meet the unbelievers in jihad [holy war], chop off their heads. And when you have brought them low, bind your prisoners rigorously. Then set them free or take ransom from them until the war is ended." (Koran, 47:4)

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and his messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be to be killed or crucified, or to have their hands and feet chopped off on opposite sides, or to be expelled out of the land. Such will be their humiliation in the world, and in the next world they will face an awful horror." (Koran, 5:33-34)

"When we decide to destroy a population, we send a definite order to them who have the good things in life and yet sin. So that Allah's word is proven true against them, then we destroy them utterly." (Koran, 17:16-17)

"In order that Allah may separate the pure from the impure, put all the impure ones [all non-Muslims] one on top of another in a heap and cast them into hell. They will have been the ones to have lost." (Koran, 8:37)
"How many were the populations we utterly destroyed because of their sins, setting up in their place other peoples." (Koran, 21:11)

"Remember Allah inspired the angels: I am with you. Give firmness to the believers. I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: you smite them above their necks and smite all their fingertips off of them." (Koran, 8:12)

:doh
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

The Muslim Bible commands Muslims to murder all non-Muslims:

"O Prophet! Make war against the unbelievers [all non-Muslims] and the hypocrites and be merciless against them. Their home is hell, an evil refuge indeed." (Koran, 9:73)

"When you meet the unbelievers in jihad [holy war], chop off their heads. And when you have brought them low, bind your prisoners rigorously. Then set them free or take ransom from them until the war is ended." (Koran, 47:4)

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and his messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be to be killed or crucified, or to have their hands and feet chopped off on opposite sides, or to be expelled out of the land. Such will be their humiliation in the world, and in the next world they will face an awful horror." (Koran, 5:33-34)

"When we decide to destroy a population, we send a definite order to them who have the good things in life and yet sin. So that Allah's word is proven true against them, then we destroy them utterly." (Koran, 17:16-17)

"In order that Allah may separate the pure from the impure, put all the impure ones [all non-Muslims] one on top of another in a heap and cast them into hell. They will have been the ones to have lost." (Koran, 8:37)
"How many were the populations we utterly destroyed because of their sins, setting up in their place other peoples." (Koran, 21:11)

"Remember Allah inspired the angels: I am with you. Give firmness to the believers. I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: you smite them above their necks and smite all their fingertips off of them." (Koran, 8:12)

:doh

Really? You should go back and read the last 2 pages of this thread. :roll:
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Looks like violence and murder in the name of Islam to me. It's just a "mistranslation" I guess.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Looks like violence and murder in the name of Islam to me. It's just a "mistranslation" I guess.
There is violence in the Qurayn, Torah and Bible. This has been shown to you many times. Why choose to focus your hatred on one book and never scrutinize your own is beyond me. Ignorance is bliss, huh?
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

There is violence in the Qurayn, Torah and Bible. This has been shown to you many times. Why choose to focus your hatred on one book and never scrutinize your own is beyond me. Ignorance is bliss, huh?

Yes, I know there is violence in the bible. I will continue to clarify until you get my point. Islam promotes violence when necessary to further the cause of Islam. Christianity and Judaism do not. The muslims today who advocate violence are using the Koran as their reason. I will keep hammering that point until you and others get it. Ahmed Shaheen advocated violence to further the cause of Islam right here a few days ago.
 
Last edited:
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Yes, I know there is violence in the bible. I will continue to clarify until you get my point. Islam promotes violence when necessary to further the cause of Islam.
I will clarify further: You have yet to prove that your opinion is a truth. Until you do so, you can not expect me to take you seriously.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

I will clarify further: You have yet to prove that your opinion is a truth. Until you do so, you can not expect me to take you seriously.

You are denying that muslims around the world are using violence and murder to further the cause of Islam?
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

You are denying that muslims around the world are using violence and murder to further the cause of Islam?

What is this cause of Islam that you keep referring to?:confused:

As for what you said about Jesus being the founder of Christianity and the New Testament... :spin: Paul was the founder of modern Christianity and contains the most authored pieces in the New Testament.

But you never bring in the Old Testament, even though Jesus said it was God's Word:
"The Scripture cannot be broken" (John 10:35)
"...the commandment of God" (Matthew 15:3)
"Word of God" (Matthew 15:6)
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

What is this cause of Islam that you keep referring to?:confused:

As for what you said about Jesus being the founder of Christianity and the New Testament... :spin: Paul was the founder of modern Christianity and contains the most authored pieces in the New Testament.

But you never bring in the Old Testament, even though Jesus said it was God's Word:
"The Scripture cannot be broken" (John 10:35)
"...the commandment of God" (Matthew 15:3)
"Word of God" (Matthew 15:6)

Paul was not the founder of "modern Christianity". I don't know what you mean by "modern Christianity". Those who follow Jesus are called Christians. Christians do not follow Paul. Paul wrote a good part of the New Testament but his words were from Jesus. That's what he said.

The Old Testament is a book of history and laws that were put away when Jesus made the new covenant (testament).

My point is that Christianity does not condone violence to further the cause of Christianity.

The "cause" of Islam is the furthering of Islam as a belief. That is why 9/11 happened. The USA is an ally of Israel and there are muslims who do not like that fact because they do not want anything in the middle east but Islam. There are many muslims who will condone the use of violence to further Islam. That is the "cause". There are many muslims who will demand death and beheading for those who insult Islam. The "insult" could be anything derogatory or negative about Islam. I am being accused by some on this site of spreading hate for quoting the Koran. If they had their way I am sure they would do violence to me.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

There is violence in the Qurayn, Torah and Bible. This has been shown to you many times. Why choose to focus your hatred on one book and never scrutinize your own is beyond me. Ignorance is bliss, huh?

I was countering Ahmed's post nothing more.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Paul was not the founder of "modern Christianity". I don't know what you mean by "modern Christianity". Those who follow Jesus are called Christians. Christians do not follow Paul. Paul wrote a good part of the New Testament but his words were from Jesus. That's what he said.
Paul, a man who never met Jesus during his life on Earth, has more works in the New Testament that any of Jesus' disciples. And you take his word over the "Word of God" as presented by Jesus?
The Old Testament is a book of history and laws that were put away when Jesus made the new covenant (testament).
Who decided to put the book away? It most surely wasn't Jesus. The 18 times he refers to the Old Testament as the 'word/commandment of God', he never once mentions to stop adhering to it.
My point is that Christianity does not condone violence to further the cause of Christianity.
But you only refer to the New Testament as being "Christianity". You're expecting us all to believe that Jesus wanted his followers to follow the teachings of some man he never met (only through some hallucinated daydream), a few works of his Disciples (that forsook him), and the judgment of Constantine I (a man who had his wife and eldest son killed) in the first Council of Nicaea. That's not "Christ-like" one bit.
The "cause" of Islam is the furthering of Islam as a belief. That is why 9/11 happened. The USA is an ally of Israel and there are muslims who do not like that fact because they do not want anything in the middle east but Islam. There are many muslims who will condone the use of violence to further Islam. That is the "cause". There are many muslims who will demand death and beheading for those who insult Islam. The "insult" could be anything derogatory or negative about Islam. I am being accused by some on this site of spreading hate for quoting the Koran. If they had their way I am sure they would do violence to me.

Where was this "cause" of Islam ever established? Not in the Qur'an. Not in the Sunnah of the Muhammad (hadith).

You're insulting Islam right now. How many people here have called for your beheading?

You're insults to Islam mean little compared to your insult on all those who claim to read legibly.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

You are denying that muslims around the world are using violence and murder to further the cause of Islam?

I totally agree!

You don't see christian suicide bombers when they feel muslims are on their holy land!

Christians resort to violence only after turning the other cheek doesn't work and then they strike like a lion!
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

I totally agree!

You don't see christian suicide bombers when they feel muslims are on their holy land!

Christians resort to violence only after turning the other cheek doesn't work and then they strike like a lion!

Correct. Nothing wrong with self defense. Christians also have a government and laws to keep the people safe. Christian preachers do not have a personal militia to carry out their religious dictates like Islam does. Big difference.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

esus Christ is the founder of Christianity and the New Testament is the instruction book.

Irrelevant...


Show me where it is taught by Jesus or any of his disciples to carry out violence to further the cause of Christianity.

Sorry, you don't get to change the rules mid-debate. We are arguing Christianity versus Islam with regards to violence, not Jesus versus Muhammed. ;)


I can show you many passages in the Koran where Muhammed (the founder of Islam) did promote violence to further the cause of Islam.

Wow... so can I.


That is not debatable at all. Those are the facts.

At least you recognize SOME facts, that is a start, at least.


Also, the Old Testament is not part of Christianity.

Let me illuminate something for you, since you seem completely out of your league on this...

Christian Bible
The Christian Bible consists of the Hebrew scriptures, which have been called the Old Testament, and some later writings known as the New Testament.

Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Old Testament
The Old Testament is the collection of books written prior to the life of Jesus but accepted by Christians as scripture ... Several Christian denominations also incorporate additional books into their canons of the Old Testament.

Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Bible
the sacred scriptures of Judaism and Christianity. The Christian Bible consists of the Old Testament and the New Testament

Bible -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia


Christianity began as a Jewish sect. Jesus, his Twelve Apostles, the Elders, his family, and essentially all of his early followers were Jewish or Jewish Proselytes.



Hopefully, you are NOT Christian, since that would not bode well for how well you learn.


Saying it is does not make it so.

You are absolutely correct. Saying it is, does not make it so. It IS so, because it IS SO. Big difference. Saying the sun is cold does not make it correct. Saying the sun is hot, and having another say I am incorrect does not make what THEY say so, either. It is hot because it is hot. The Old Testament is part of the Bible and part of Christianity because the Old Testament is part of the Bible and part of Christianity. It simply is that way.



Chrisitans follow the teachings of Jesus.

Not all. The Old Testament is also taught to Christians and it is a part of the Bible and part of Christianity.


Muslims follow the teachings of Muhammed.

The follow the Qu'ran...


Deal with that.

You're getting boring. Please tell me you're a kid... seriously.
 
Re: OMG.. About 300 killed and 700 injured. Do you think Israel still seeking for pea

Irrelevant...




Sorry, you don't get to change the rules mid-debate. We are arguing Christianity versus Islam with regards to violence, not Jesus versus Muhammed. ;)




Wow... so can I.




At least you recognize SOME facts, that is a start, at least.




Let me illuminate something for you, since you seem completely out of your league on this...

Christian Bible
The Christian Bible consists of the Hebrew scriptures, which have been called the Old Testament, and some later writings known as the New Testament.

Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Old Testament
The Old Testament is the collection of books written prior to the life of Jesus but accepted by Christians as scripture ... Several Christian denominations also incorporate additional books into their canons of the Old Testament.

Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Bible
the sacred scriptures of Judaism and Christianity. The Christian Bible consists of the Old Testament and the New Testament

Bible -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia


Christianity began as a Jewish sect. Jesus, his Twelve Apostles, the Elders, his family, and essentially all of his early followers were Jewish or Jewish Proselytes.



Hopefully, you are NOT Christian, since that would not bode well for how well you learn.




You are absolutely correct. Saying it is, does not make it so. It IS so, because it IS SO. Big difference. Saying the sun is cold does not make it correct. Saying the sun is hot, and having another say I am incorrect does not make what THEY say so, either. It is hot because it is hot. The Old Testament is part of the Bible and part of Christianity because the Old Testament is part of the Bible and part of Christianity. It simply is that way.





Not all. The Old Testament is also taught to Christians and it is a part of the Bible and part of Christianity.




The follow the Qu'ran...




You're getting boring. Please tell me you're a kid... seriously.

Why don't you debate in complete thoughts instead of taking little snippits to control the debate? Any fool can do that and many do. That is an old tactic of weak debaters on the internet. In an actual debate you cannot do that. You have to actually form a complete thought to answer a complete thought. This is a tactic of weakness. You're weak.

I agree the entire bible is scripture; however, violence is not condoned by Jesus or the father God to further Christianity. Show me the scripture. Put up or shut up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom