And as I say (I guess this one is open to legal debate, as I am not sure of the exact wording and interpretations of relevant laws), I believe in pursuing charges of treason aggainst George Bush and his war mongering cabal (for misrepresenting inteligence).
Debate the legality if you want. I stated from the start that I am not a legal expert, and asked poeple opinions on it. I lol @ the idea that I would stake my ego on something that I acknowlege that I do not know with any certainty.
Honestly. Id ont know why I click view post for either of you. I guess itsmsotly that I feel bad for continuing a discussion, and denying the right of reply.
But honestly,I dont feel that conversation with you guys is worth while.
As for your (not goober,the other poster) colege education and a high I.Q? Guess what? Same. In international politics. Do u want a cookie? I know plenty of technicaly inteligent, but woefuly ignorant people with college degrees. The western world is full of them. Get down off that pedastal, as Im likely twice the expert you are on the things we post on in this forum, and im not sweating you or anyone about it.
In essence: If in fact that single quote that goober posted is an exaustive list of laws regarding treason in the united states federal legal system, ten such a charge could not be pursued. But as you will see clearly above, this thought was a concept of research for me. One that I acepted is open to debate, as I am unsure and want to know the verity of the situation.
Based on the presumption that this referance you cited is an exaustedlistof relevant alws in the U.S. legal system, I support campaigning for laws that change this.
I believe that when it comes to gross missconduct by a president against the people (the voting shareholders in government), that treason should be a relevant charge. I am not asking to hold your presidents accountable to me. Only to you, the American people. And I believe the crime should be the same for a civilian 2. If you lead the country into war on knowing lies, you are betraying your country. It is that simple.
The only problem with this is that I am wary of power holders laying the blame on fall guys. I believe george bush knew he was lying, and that if he did not he should have. Because his claims were without any factual merit. (certainty of wmds, links to alqueda). It was all nonsense.
And all of this presumes that there was no complicity/deliberate inaction regarding the septermber 11 attacks. IF (which I am far from presuming, but I am uncertain due to lack of relevant expertise and adequate research) George Bush (or any other American) knew of in advance, deliberately ignored in progress, planned or executed any action in support of this attack for any reason, treason would (IF it is the case) be grounds for treason, under the provision cited.
I would like to think we could all agree on that. Not that he had any involvement, or that anyone else did. But that IF it were the case, treason would be the relevant charge.
I hold no opinion on this (although I have read the project for a new American century, and do believe that they have clearly manipulating these events to achieve prestated ends), as im in no better position to judge than people who argue either way about the issue. But I figure its worth bringing up, considering how many people believe that this is what happened.