Here's another one...Or how about this one regarding Bush's false claims about the "yellowcake" in Niger Hussein was trying to get to make his "bomb"?Media Still Letting Bush Lie on Iraq Inspectors
ABC, WaPo fail to challenge president's misinformation
In a December 1 interview with ABC anchor Charles Gibson, George W. Bush gave a grossly erroneous history of the run-up to the Iraq War--a false version of events that Gibson failed to challenge and the Washington Post glossed over the following day.
This was one of the examples of the "intel at the time" not going along with the Bush mantra. However, this comes from the actual nuclear experts at the UN. If anyone should know what Iraq was doing with any nuclear aspirations, it would be the IAEA. But Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, just blew them off! I could go on, but it's getting late.Ilana Mercer, "'Just War' for dummies," WorldNetDaily, March 12, 2003: "In the 2,000 kilometers he crisscrossed in three weeks of searching for nuclear-development activities, in the 75 facilities examined, in 218 nuclear inspections at 141 sites, including 21 newly discovered sites, Hans Blix's colleague, Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, met with an 'overall deterioration' and disrepair in Iraqi infrastructure. No trace of firing up production, North Korea or Iran-style. ... The account makes polite mention of an investigation into reports (spread by the U.S.) regarding Iraq's uranium transactions. They were 'not authentic,' which is a refined way of informing reasonable minds what the American power-worshipping chattering classes (and networks) criminally conceal: They were forgeries, folks!"
I will say you still haven't addressed the point I raised earlier about us attacking a country that did not attack us first. How can you possibly consider yourself taking the "high ground" (as you stated on the other thread), when you are trying to justify a decision that has resulted in over a million people losing their lives and over 5 million people forced from their homes that are now living as refugees? How can you possibly consider yourself morally superior when you defend what we've done to these people? And it won't matter how much you say I need to read about Islam, you still haven't offered any evidence to refute what I just stated.