| Polls Failed Policies of the Past?; Bill Clinton admitting Democrats caused this, and Democrats smearing Republicans for claiming Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac need to be reformed ... |
10-01-08, 12:00 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Sage
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 11-19-08 09:57 AM Location: America (A.K.A., a red state)
Posts: 7,005
Thanks: 150
Thanked 294 Times in 236 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Failed Policies of the Past? Bill Clinton admitting Democrats caused this, and Democrats smearing Republicans for claiming Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac need to be reformed to prevent meltdown: YouTube - Shocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis McCain's reform bill to prevent all of this, defeated by Democrats: GovTrack: Senate Record: FEDERAL HOUSING ENTERPRISE REGULATORY REFORM... (109-s20060525-16) The lawsuit Barack Obama filed against Citibank for not giving mortgages to people who couldn't pay them back:
" Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance
Docket / Court 94 C 4094 ( N.D. Ill. ) FH-IL-0011
State/Territory Illinois
Case Summary
Plaintiffs filed their class action lawsuit on July 6, 1994, alleging that Citibank had engaged in redlining practices in the Chicago metropolitan area in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. 1691; the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619; the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; and 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1982. Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant-bank rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, actual damages, and punitive damages.
U.S. District Court Judge Ruben Castillo certified the Plaintiffs’ suit as a class action on June 30, 1995. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 162 F.R.D. 322 (N.D. Ill. 1995). Also on June 30, Judge Castillo granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery of a sample of Defendant-bank’s loan application files. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 162 F.R.D. 338 (N.D. Ill. 1995).
The parties voluntarily dismissed the case on May 12, 1998, pursuant to a settlement agreement.
Plaintiff’s Lawyers Alexis, Hilary I. (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Childers, Michael Allen (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Clayton, Fay (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Cummings, Jeffrey Irvine (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Love, Sara Norris (Virginia)
FH-IL-0011-9000
Miner, Judson Hirsch (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-9000 Obama, Barack H. (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Wickert, John Henry (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-9000" Obama Sued Citibank Under CRA to Force it to Make Bad Loans The IUSB Vision Weblog
__________________ They tell you they are not going to tax your family. No, they're just going to tax ‘businesses!’ So unless you buy something from a ‘business,’ like groceries or clothes or gasoline ... or unless you get a paycheck from a big or a small ‘business,’ don't worry ... it's not going to affect you. -Fred Thompson
Last edited by aquapub : 10-01-08 at 12:04 PM.
|
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to aquapub For This Useful Post: | |
10-14-08, 11:56 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Sage
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 11-19-08 09:57 AM Location: America (A.K.A., a red state)
Posts: 7,005
Thanks: 150
Thanked 294 Times in 236 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Aw shucks...I thought liberals wanted to talk about the issues? |
| |
10-15-08, 12:08 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Enemy Combatant
Join Date: Jul 2005 Last Online: Today 01:43 PM Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 11,030
Thanks: 745
Thanked 2,050 Times in 1,224 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Once you cut through all the bull****, your entire post can be boiled down to two sentences, which describe your premise accurately: Quote:
Originally Posted by aquapub The lawsuit Barack Obama filed against Citibank for not giving mortgages to people who couldn't pay them back: | Quote: |
Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant-bank rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories.
|
Translation: "Everyone knows that niggers don't pay their bills. Therefore Obama caused the financial crisis."
__________________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.
-Douglas Adams |
| |
10-15-08, 12:13 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Sage
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 11-19-08 09:57 AM Location: America (A.K.A., a red state)
Posts: 7,005
Thanks: 150
Thanked 294 Times in 236 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar Translation: "Everyone knows that niggers don't pay their bills. Therefore Obama caused the financial crisis." | Meanwhile, the literate interpretation of my statement is that Obama directly contributed to the meltdown, not that he caused it. Feeble straw man fallacy. Try again
This would be the same Obama who took the 2nd highest amount of campaign contributions in history from Fannie Mae on its way down. "Change," my rectum. Obama is no reformer. He's the status quo in Washington, not the solution.
Also...
Newsflash: Just because Obama used BS race-hysteria to rationalize suing Citibank into lowering its lending standards in no way refutes the fact that this frivolous lawsuit directly contributed to these bad loans.
It was Democrats who passed the Community Reinvestment Act and pressured banks to make bad loans, Democrats who stopped reforms by McCain and Bush both, Democrats who created this culture of unaccountable lending, and it was Obama himself who helped lower lending standards.
Yet another economic catastrophe caused by "the party of the economy." 
Last edited by aquapub : 10-15-08 at 12:21 AM.
|
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to aquapub For This Useful Post: | |
10-15-08, 12:22 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Young Money Millionaire
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Today 11:21 AM
Posts: 13,048
Thanks: 2,791
Thanked 3,081 Times in 1,965 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Since somebody was talking about the CRA I thought it would be relevant to provide a study by Traiger & Hinckley LLP. http://www.traigerlaw.com/publicatio...udy_1-7-08.pdf
Side note : Quote: Our study concludes that CRA Banks were substantially less likely than other lenders
to make the kinds of risky home purchase loans that helped fuel the foreclosure crisis.
Specifically, our analysis shows that:
|
__________________ Is Intolerant Because He Won't Let The Intolerant Run Other People's Lives. |
| |
10-15-08, 12:52 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Enemy Combatant
Join Date: Jul 2005 Last Online: Today 01:43 PM Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 11,030
Thanks: 745
Thanked 2,050 Times in 1,224 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Quote:
Originally Posted by aquapub Meanwhile, the literate interpretation of my statement is that Obama directly contributed to the meltdown, not that he caused it. Feeble straw man fallacy. Try again | 
Do you mean the literal interpretation? Quote: |
Originally Posted by aquapub Newsflash: Just because Obama used BS race-hysteria to rationalize suing Citibank into lowering its lending standards in no way refutes the fact that this frivolous lawsuit directly contributed to these bad loans. | You claimed that Obama sued them "for not giving mortgages to people who couldn't pay them back." According to the legal summary which YOU CITED, Obama sued them because they rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories.
Therefore it logically follows that you were claiming that minority applicants are not as reliable as white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories.
If I am mistaken about your claim, please enlighten me. Who WERE you referring to when you said "people who couldn't pay them back"? Are you claiming that financial institutions that discriminate against minorities are doing the right thing, and that the people who sue them are wrong? 
Last edited by Kandahar : 10-15-08 at 12:54 AM.
|
| | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kandahar For This Useful Post: | |
10-15-08, 12:56 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Sage
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 11-19-08 09:57 AM Location: America (A.K.A., a red state)
Posts: 7,005
Thanks: 150
Thanked 294 Times in 236 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatuey | This spin from a law firm with everything to gain from protecting CRA in no way refutes the CRA's involvement in this crisis. Even Clinton's Treasury officials have admitted that half the bad loans were CRA loans. And the underlying claim here is that while many of the bad loans were CRA loans, the bigger issue is the culture of lending unaccountability this government hostility to lenders created.
Democrats put the government in charge of another part of the free market, and now it's a disaster. They gave lenders a blank check and a phony nanny state safety net while pressuring them to give loans to people who couldn't afford them.
Democrats caused this crisis, just as they caused insane gas prices, just like they continue to cause our jobs to be sent overseas. These people need to be kept as far away from power as is humanly possible. |
| |
10-15-08, 01:06 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Young Money Millionaire
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Today 11:21 AM
Posts: 13,048
Thanks: 2,791
Thanked 3,081 Times in 1,965 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Quote:
Originally Posted by aquapub This spin from a law firm with everything to gain from protecting CRA in no way refutes the CRA's involvement in this crisis. | Can you show what this particular firm has to gain? For that matter can you show what they've spun?
[quote] Even Clinton's Treasury officials have admitted that half the bad loans were CRA loans. And the underlying claim here is that while many of the bad loans were CRA loans, the bigger issue is the culture of lending unaccountability this government hostility to lenders created. McClatchy Washington Bureau | 10/12/2008 | Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis Quote:
Federal housing data reveal that the charges aren't true, and that the private sector, not the government or government-backed companies, was behind the soaring subprime lending at the core of the crisis.
Subprime lending offered high-cost loans to the weakest borrowers during the housing boom that lasted from 2001 to 2007. Subprime lending was at its height from 2004 to 2006.
Federal Reserve Board data show that:
# More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.
# Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.
# Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that's being lambasted by conservative critics. | Quote:
Democrats put the government in charge of another part of the free market, and now it's a disaster. They gave lenders a blank check and a phony nanny state safety net while pressuring them to give loans to people who couldn't afford them.
Democrats caused this crisis, just as they caused insane gas prices, just like they continue to cause our jobs to be sent overseas. These people need to be kept as far away from power as is humanly possible.
| Yes pubby. Democrats responsible for everything. Even tides. |
| |
10-15-08, 01:10 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Sage
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 11-19-08 09:57 AM Location: America (A.K.A., a red state)
Posts: 7,005
Thanks: 150
Thanked 294 Times in 236 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar 
Do you mean the literal interpretation? | Nope. I meant exactly what I said. You illiterately misstated my position. I figured questioning your literacy was more polite than questioning your honesty. Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar You claimed that Obama sued them "for not giving mortgages to people who couldn't pay them back." According to the legal summary which YOU CITED, Obama sued them because they rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories. | Right. That was the spin. The substance was that Obama filed a bogus race-baiting lawsuit...the results of which required Citibank to lower its lending standards. Quote:
Originally Posted by Kandahar Therefore it logically follows that you were claiming that minority applicants are not as reliable as white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories. | Wrong again. What logically follows is that you read the spin being put forward in the lawsuit about how these minorities were "similar" to others and treated it as fact. You putting such blind faith in the word of trial lawyers is not me being racist. It's you being a liberal. |
| |
10-15-08, 01:16 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Enemy Combatant
Join Date: Jul 2005 Last Online: Today 01:43 PM Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 11,030
Thanks: 745
Thanked 2,050 Times in 1,224 Posts
Lean: Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Failed Policies of the Past? Quote:
Originally Posted by aquapub Right. That was the spin. The substance was that Obama filed a bogus race-baiting lawsuit...the results of which required Citibank to lower its lending standards.
Wrong again. What logically follows is that you read the spin being put forward in the lawsuit about how these minorities were "similar" to others and treated it as fact. You putting such blind faith in the word of trial lawyers is not me being racist. It's you being a liberal. | If it's just spin, why did you bother to cite the case summary in the first place? It's not like I'm dredging up stuff from the Huffington Post here, I'm going off of the case summary which YOU CITED.
Furthermore, on what basis did you conclude that their claim was "just spin"? Since it settled out of court, the judge rendered no decision as to the veracity of the claims. Or are you just ASSUMING it's spin since it has Obama's name next to it? You're funny. 
Last edited by Kandahar : 10-15-08 at 01:17 AM.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/37142-failed-policies-past.html | | Posted By | For | Type | Date | | citibank | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | 10-16-08 11:03 AM | | |