Can we afford another year of right wing government?

Navy Pride said:

My point is the French and the Germans had good reason to vote against invading Iraq........They lost all the money they were stealing from the food for oil program.........

And the Rapist is that scum bag "Slick Willie".......

Click to expand...

Yes, you've made the point clear that the accused rapist Bush and his administration had good reason to attack Iraq so they could get control of the Iraq oil for their buddies in US Big Oil companies.

But:

1. Why are you bringing up Clinton in a thread about Bush? I have seen you several times before complain when other people "hijack" threads by bringing up Bush. Or are your rules only for everyone else to follow?

2. Since you did bring it up, please provide a reliable source for your claim that Clinton was convicted of rape. Or confirm again for everyone on the board that you are a liar, just as you proved when you wrote a couple days ago that Clinton was a convicted felon when you knew that was a lie and then cut-n-ran when asked to back it up.

As for my statement about the accused rapist Bush, that is the truth, Bush was accused of rape. And in an earlier thread you had approved "accused rapist" as a label for anyone accused of rape, so you have no basis to complain about me using that lable in posts with you.

On the other hand, if you want to stop using childish slurs and insults to describe the Clintons in your posts, I will certainly do the same for Bush in posts with you.


PS: And go ahead and whine to the mods, like you do, but every time you state a lie and do not back it up or retract it I will state the truth: that you are a liar. Because if you are going to make statements as fact that you will not back up with a source when asked, you are putting your own credibility on the line, and thus it is fair game to comment on it. If the mods want to ban me for speaking the truth, that is up to them.

dragonslayer said:

yes it really helps to have the company who make the voting machines and the engineers who can alter the programs on your side. Bush lost the election to Gore and still became president. This is according to the Congressional Oversight committee that was established by congress to investigate the Florida election debacle. The report was released 2 or 3 days after 911. Gore gave in because of the 911 attack, but legally Gore was president.

Click to expand...

Got any links to actually back up the BS that Gore was legally president? I'd love to see them. I'd love to see some proof to such an amazing statement, or how even a congressional oversight committee declaring it, even if they did, would legally change hte president. Come on man, if you're going ot make some outrageous claims you whiny little conspiracy theorist lets see something to back it up

Ikari said:

You won't hear me saying they shouldn't have been in trouble for doing so.

Click to expand...

In trouble.........According to your thinking they violated the Constitution.....They should have been impeached.........

Iriemon said:

Yes, you've made the point clear that the accused rapist Bush and his administration had good reason to attack Iraq so they could get control of the Iraq oil for their buddies in US Big Oil companies.
But:

1. Why are you bringing up Clinton in a thread about Bush? I have seen you several times before complain when other people "hijack" threads by bringing up Bush. Or are your rules only for everyone else to follow?

2. Since you did bring it up, please provide a reliable source for your claim that Clinton was convicted of rape. Or confirm again for everyone on the board that you are a liar, just as you proved when you wrote a couple days ago that Clinton was a convicted felon when you knew that was a lie and then cut-n-ran when asked to back it up.

As for my statement about the accused rapist Bush, that is the truth, Bush was accused of rape. And in an earlier thread you had approved "accused rapist" as a label for anyone accused of rape, so you have no basis to complain about me using that lable in posts with you.

On the other hand, if you want to stop using childish slurs and insults to describe the Clintons in your posts, I will certainly do the same for Bush in posts with you.


PS: And go ahead and whine to the mods, like you do, but every time you state a lie and do not back it up or retract it I will state the truth: that you are a liar. Because if you are going to make statements as fact that you will not back up with a source when asked, you are putting your own credibility on the line, and thus it is fair game to comment on it. If the mods want to ban me for speaking the truth, that is up to them.

Click to expand...

You have to be ******** me........How much oil have we gotten from Iraq since we invaded??????? What is the price of gasoline.......Get a ****ing clue...........

Navy Pride said:

You have to be ******** me........How much oil have we gotten from Iraq since we invaded??????? What is the price of gasoline.......Get a ****ing clue...........

Click to expand...

I see you have yet again made a false statement as fact you refused to back up or retract, Liar.

Your post just emphasizes the gross incompentence of the accused rapist Bush Administration in failing to accomplish its goals. Tell us something we didn't already know.

Ikari said:

Sure have, it's one of the degradations of separation of powers we had put into the system so that one branch wouldn't gain too much power. Congress can't give away its powers, those powers don't belong to them they can't give them away. The borrow the power from the People and the People divided up the powers specifically as they were for a reason. We tell each branch what they can do, and that's what they can and need to do. They can't pawn off their responsibilities on other branches or try to make things more "efficient" by yielding pieces of their privilege and duty to other branches. The War Powers Act needs to be abolished.

Click to expand...

???? The war powers act was a restriction of Presidential powers. Congress declares war. You seem to begin with the assumption that if our military is engaged in combat, we are in a war against some nation and we must declare war upon that nation. Not so.

Navy Pride said:

In trouble.........According to your thinking they violated the Constitution.....They should have been impeached.........

Click to expand...

Quite so, but I can't do anything about that now. All I can do is rally against the current incarnation of the government and try to control that.

Iriemon said:

I see you have yet again made a false statement as fact you refused to back up or retract, Liar.

Your post just emphasizes the gross incompentence of the accused rapist Bush Administration in failing to accomplish its goals. Tell us something we didn't already know.

Click to expand...

You said we benefited from attacking Iraq by taking their oil. I called you on that and said we have not take drop of oil from Iraq.....I also said if we had taken Iraq's oil gasoline would not be close to $4.00 a gallon.......

You were wrong....just admit it and move on.........

Navy Pride said:

You said we benefited from attacking Iraq by taking their oil. ........

Click to expand...

Yet another lie by Navy Pride.

You said that Clinton was a convicted felon.

You were wrong....just admit it and move on.........

You said Clinton was a rapist.

You were wrong....just admit it and move on.........

You said that I said we benefited from attacking Iraq by taking their oil.

You were wrong....just admit it and move on.........

Navy Pride said:

You said we benefited from attacking Iraq by taking their oil. I called you on that and said we have not take drop of oil from Iraq.....I also said if we had taken Iraq's oil gasoline would not be close to $4.00 a gallon.......

You were wrong....just admit it and move on.........

Click to expand...

I take it you dont fare well on reading comprehension tests.

Irie wrote:

Bush and his administration had good reason to attack Iraq so they could get control of the Iraq oil for their buddies in US Big Oil companies.

Click to expand...

I fail to see the connection of taking. They have to gain control of Iraq in order for anyone including the Iraqi people to effectively take the oil from the ground...

Why do you put words in other peoples mouth's???

Goldenboy219 said:

I take it you dont fare well on reading comprehension tests.

Irie wrote:

I fail to see the connection of taking. They have to gain control of Iraq in order for anyone including the Iraqi people to effectively take the oil from the ground...

Why do you put words in other peoples mouth's???

Click to expand...

Navy reads and comprehends just fine. He's just dishonest.

I dont know about that. This seems to be a common theme in all of his Bush defenses.

Honestly, i think he gets so mad when anyone says anything about Bush 43, that he becomes increasingly defensive and skews words to fit his logic.

I suppose when the Iraqis maintain control of their own oil and when they sign contracts with Chinese, Russian, European and US oil companies, you guys will argue that we tried to take control but failed to do so.