Russell797
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
- Messages
- 4,394
- Reaction score
- 1,063
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I voted no, but it was painful. Vaccination works, it is one of the safer things you will do in your life, and it benefits not just the person vaccinated, but those around them. However, I do not think it is the government's role to tell people what medical treatment they have to get. That just strikes me as antithetical to what we as a country should be.
Does that mean that if the government will not protect me from the irresponsible behaviours of others that I can and should take matters into my own hands when an irresponsible someone puts me at risk. Can I punch their lights out or otherwise keep them away from me and my children by force? Sounds like anarchy is the alternative to government edict. Either that or the miscreants get away with harmful behaviour with impunity.
Last edited: