• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Today: Hillary to Face No Charges as a Result of Wiener's Emails

Status
Not open for further replies.
lurchadams

lurchadams

Zoom Warrior
Banned
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
31,842
Reaction score
15,818
Location
Seattle Area
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This just in, although the Hillary-hater in the FBI tried to kill HRC's chances, it turns out the new emails were like the old emails a big bowl of nothing. The right-wing Hillary-hating nut-jobs are going to have to come up with some other horse hockey quickly or HRC's gonna be their new leader. For those keeping score: Number of accusations against the Clintons: 1,000,000. Number of accusations that without any foundation: 1,000,000. Number of indictments: 0.

Try again, you hateful, right-wing nut jobs!

Here's a link to today's good news:

Hillary Clinton Won't Face Charges For New Emails, FBI Director Tells Congress | Huffington Post
 
The only reason that Hillary Clinton escaped being charged for her actions for improper handling of classified information on a non-regulated server, as well as for the Clinton Foundation scandal is because her Party is in the White House and the DOJ is headed by a Democrat who knows she will retain the office if Hillary is elected.

The FBI is a sub-agency of the DOJ. The FBI is empowered to investigate, but they do not decide whether to not to prosecute. They present their results to the DOJ and if the DOJ says "nothing to see here," then all the FBI can say is there is nothing to see. Hence, the verbal legerdemain Director Comey presented after listing all the very real problems with what Ms. Clinton did...in order to saying "nothing prosecutable" that first time.

You can rest assured had she been running while a Republican was in office and a Republican appointee was in charge of the DOJ she would have been indicted.

The problem with both these scenarios? It should not matter which Party holds office; the law should be administered as represented by the symbol of Justice, blindly equally regardless of who the person is.
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
The only reason that Hillary Clinton escaped being charged for her actions in handling classified information on a non-regulated server, and for the Clinton Foundation scandal is because her Party is in the White House and the DOJ is headed by a Democrat who knows she will retain the office if Hillary is elected. (Still Typing.)
Click to expand...

Not true. The FBI is lead by a republican, James Comey. It was he that recommended no charges be filed against Clinton. The FBI is also infested with HRC-haters that tried to tank her chances with horse-hockey days before the election. If there was any "there" there, the FBI would have found it and recommended HRC be charged with a crime.

Try again.
 
lurchadams said:
Not true. The FBI is lead by a republican, James Comey. It was he that recommended no charges be filed against Clinton. The FBI is also infested with HRC-haters that tried to tank her chances with horse-hockey days before the election. If there was any "there" there, the FBI would have found it and recommended HRC be charged with a crime.

Try again.
Click to expand...

You try again. Comey is a former Republican. FBI director says he's no longer a registered Republican - POLITICO
 
lurchadams said:
Not true. The FBI is lead by a republican, James Comey. It was he that recommended no charges be filed against Clinton. The FBI is also infested with HRC-haters that tried to tank her chances with horse-hockey days before the election. If there was any "there" there, the FBI would have found it and recommended HRC be charged with a crime.

Try again.
Click to expand...

You try again.

There was already plenty of evidence from the original investigation sufficient to charge Hillary Clinton with a number of acts of malfeasance while serving as Secretary of State. Moreover, actions were taken to allow her to hide and destroy evidence which, under any normal police investigation (much less that by the FBI) could never have occurred had proper procedure been followed.

The investigating agency will get a search warrant empowering them to enter, search for, and seize any evidence. They will do that in a raid, not via polite telephone and email notices. There is no heads up "by the way we're about to investigate your email servers and devices so would you mind terribly much pre-cleaning them up before we seize them?" There is also no "here's blanket immunity, now is there anything you'd like to say?" either.

Moreover, the FBI investigates at the will and direction of their superior agency, the Dept. of Justice. If the DOJ says: "Let them know in advance, don't check anything until her lawyer's review unsupervised to delete 'personal mail,' and BTW be a good boy and grant immunity so we can get some cooperation," then the FBI will follow instructions.

Finally, the DOJ decides if there is sufficient evidence to press charges, not the FBI. If the DOJ tells the FBI that there is nothing in their evidence to suggest charges...then the FBI will state so.

Comey being the good little ex-Republican chaffing under the thumb of his boss, took a shot at rebellion. Now he's back in line. End of story.
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
You try again.

There was already plenty of evidence from the original investigation sufficient to charge Hillary Clinton with a number of acts of malfeasance while serving as Secretary of State. Moreover, actions were taken to allow her to hide and destroy evidence which, under any normal police investigation (much less that by the FBI) could never have occurred had proper procedure been followed.

The investigating agency will get a search warrant empowering them to enter, search for, and seize any evidence. They will do that in a raid, not via polite telephone and email notices. There is no heads up "by the way we're about to investigate your email servers and devices so would you mind terribly much pre-cleaning them up before we seize them?" There is also no "here's blanket immunity, now is there anything you'd like to say?" either.

Moreover, the FBI investigates at the will and direction of their superior agency, the Dept. of Justice. If the DOJ says: "Let them know in advance, don't check anything until her lawyer's review unsupervised to delete 'personal mail,' and BTW be a good boy and grant immunity so we can get some cooperation," then the FBI will follow instructions.

Finally, the DOJ decides if there is sufficient evidence to press charges, not the FBI. If the DOJ tells the FBI that there is nothing in their evidence to suggest charges...then the FBI will state so.

Comey being the good little ex-Republican chaffing under the thumb of his boss, took a shot at rebellion. Now he's back in line. End of story.
Click to expand...

Yeah, whatever. The DOJ makes the final determination based on what the FBI tells them and the FBI recommended NO CHARGES BE FILED. In your fevered dreams you want to believe that Comey's RECOMMENDATION was predetermined by the DOJ? Keep dreaming, keep dreaming.
 
The DRUDGE REPORT headline today says 42 MILLION VOTE ALREADY. Its their way of publicly bragging that the Comey letter to Congress revelation of two weeks ago has hurt Clinton and cost her votes.

And that was the purpose of it from the start.

Its disgusting.
 
haymarket said:
The DRUDGE REPORT headline today says 42 MILLION VOTE ALREADY. Its their way of publicly bragging that the Comey letter to Congress revelation of two weeks ago has hurt Clinton and cost her votes.

And that was the purpose of it from the start.

Its disgusting.
Click to expand...

Depends on your understanding of the law. What is truly disgusting, is that little pee on's like you and I would have lost our careers, and possibly faced jail time over handling documents the way she did.

It's happened more times than you would care to admit, or spend any time researching.
 
Surely no one seriously believed that she will ever going to face justice. She most likely never will. In time, perhaps, so much more will come out but not for a long time. Even then, she is too powerful, too rich, too many connections, and too many will go down with her so they will ensure she stays out of jail. Anyone with an IQ even a little above room temperature knows that she is corrupt...shrug...tis the way of things.

There is one good thing about her winning next week....Americans will have had enough of her by the end of her first term, there will, hopefully, be a large swing away from her and her party. But then again, who was it who said "Never underestimate the stupidity of large groups of people"?
 
lurchadams said:
This just in, although the Hillary-hater in the FBI tried to kill HRC's chances, it turns out the new emails were like the old emails a big bowl of nothing. The right-wing Hillary-hating nut-jobs are going to have to come up with some other horse hockey quickly or HRC's gonna be their new leader. For those keeping score: Number of accusations against the Clintons: 1,000,000. Number of accusations that without any foundation: 1,000,000. Number of indictments: 0.

Try again, you hateful, right-wing nut jobs!

Here's a link to today's good news:

Hillary Clinton Won't Face Charges For New Emails, FBI Director Tells Congress | Huffington Post
Click to expand...

Its always fun to watch hateful, left-wing nut jobs attack their counterparts on the right.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Not a R.I.P. thread. Also not a Poll. And baiting on top of that. Thread Closed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom