- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Yeah, I bet...lol
-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
Should the FBI investigate leaks pertaining to the Clinton investigation?
- Thread starter JANFU
- Start date
Yeah, I bet...lol
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 22,399
- Reaction score
- 11,866
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You asked, I answered. Getting sick and tired of you asking me questions and I answer them and you still make personal attack comments.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
What personal attack? :lamo
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 22,399
- Reaction score
- 11,866
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
you think you are being clever, you are not.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
I'm clever and I'm not even trying. :lamo
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 22,399
- Reaction score
- 11,866
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Cool story bro.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 53,409
- Reaction score
- 31,473
- Location
- Northern California
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No, the FBI should not be allowed to investigate itself, but the DOJ sure as hell should. There are individuals in the FBI that are using their "credibility" in a partisan, and I believe illegal, manner. They won't get to the bottom of it before the election, of course, but they damned well better get to the bottom of it, and soon.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
joG
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2013
- Messages
- 43,839
- Reaction score
- 9,655
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yes. We do have to deal with the difficulties of electronic infirmation. There are new challenges there.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2009
- Messages
- 10,999
- Reaction score
- 5,430
- Location
- Southeast Michigan
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Absolutely this should be investigated. Comey should be fired for it.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction score
- 1,941
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
We have whistle blower policies/legislation that protects government employees. If the rank and file see what could reasonably be a violation of law or abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to the public... they have protections for going public.
In reality, we, the people, the real bosses, truly want and need to know what the hell is going on in these upper echelons of power where it is thought that certain folks can get away with breaking the law, especially when based solely on politics and what is most certainly corruption from the VERY top.
Especially when all other folks do not get that same pass.
Obama and clan cannot always plead ignorance, "oh, I just found out about that in the news myself" without someone doing what they felt they had to do and leak such malfeasance since the corruption within the departments [read: IRS, DOJ...] is soooo rampant and nothing is/was being done to correct it. Anybody with ANY sense can see that Hillary broke, many times over, laws that others are in jail for, just one violation, RIGHT NOW.
For all of you that will rush to claim that we have a system of justice where you must be tried and convicted before we know laws were violated, you would also have to establish that system was not completely broken and worked in Hillary's case.
And it didn't and hasn't. Obama for instance, we now know, was using a pseudonym and responding to Hillary on her homebrew server. Huma tells us that she changed her email repeatedly and so Obama was made aware of this and kept responding to the new addresses. Hmmmm, certainly don't want that to come out, especially if anything classified went through her unprotected non government servers.
Then you had the former Bill hire, AG Lynch, in a secret meeting with Bill, whose wife was under criminal investigation [as well as he and the C Foundation], right? Did Lynch or BJ announce this to the world? Nope. They would have totally kept it on the down low. It was no doubt her FBI detail, the only ones in any real position to know, that leaked this very important ethical issue about a supreme conflict of interest.
If it were not for folks out there risking to let us know, we would be forever in the dark. The Obama admin certainly has proven it doesn't turn on those lights... Hill, Billy and cartel certainly have proven they, more than all others, have not and will not.
If we always had sunshine in these matters, we would not need all these anonymous flashlights going off, giving us brief glimpses into nooks and crannies of these dark corridors of corrupted power.
Last edited: