• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For those voting for Hillary Clinton

I'm voting for Hillary Clinton because...

  • She has shown knowledge, experience and integrity for the job. I trust her 100%.

    Votes: 9 12.7%

  • She is qualified for the job even if I don't 100% trust her.

    Votes: 38 53.5%

  • I don't trust her at all, but she's better than Trump.

    Votes: 16 22.5%

  • Something else

    Votes: 8 11.3%
  • Total voters
    71
Mason66 said:
Yes, it didn't matter in 2008, so why now?
Click to expand...

Of course it mattered in 2008. Which issue of Breitbart or Infowars are you referring to?
 
Thorgasm said:
Back at you, it was important, but now it's not?
Click to expand...

Just like Bill Clinton made it so integrity nor honesty is needed to be President, now since Obama, experience is not either.
 
Cardinal said:
Of course it mattered in 2008. Which issue of Breitbart or Infowars are you referring to?
Click to expand...

If you voted for Obama in 2008, experience was not important.
 
Mason66 said:
If you voted for Obama in 2008, experience was not important.
Click to expand...

And that is something one would believe if your source for information was Breitbart and Infowars. If you like I can refer you to news sites whose primary goal isn't to make their readers even dumber than they already are.
 
Mason66 said:
Just like Bill Clinton made it so integrity nor honesty is needed to be President, now since Obama, experience is not either.
Click to expand...

It's nice that you let the guy you have attacked for 8 years set your standards.
 
Cardinal said:
And that is something one would believe if your source for information was Breitbart and Infowars. If you like I can refer you to news sites whose primary goal isn't to make their readers even dumber than they already are.
Click to expand...

Do you not have your own eyes?

I certainly do.

When Obama came on the scene I thought, empty suit.

I can't for the life of me figure out why people got so excited about a guy that quit his first term as a US Senator to run for President.

He had no administrative experience.

He had no executive experience.

He had no experience of any kind to prepare him for the job, so why did so many people vote for him?
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Experience doesn't always translate into good habits. Failure is, however, one the greatest teachers.
Click to expand...

And yet, you are the on touting Hillary's 'experience', aren't you?

Failures come at an expense. Hillary's ME failures have cost many lives have cost fortunes. Yet, more than happy to elect her and her corrupt political machine to the highest office.

I'm beginning to be suspicious of your judgement.
 
Mason66 said:
Do you not have your own eyes?

I certainly do.

When Obama came on the scene I thought, empty suit.

I can't for the life of me figure out why people got so excited about a guy that quit his first term as a US Senator to run for President.

He had no administrative experience.

He had no executive experience.

He had no experience of any kind to prepare him for the job, so why did so many people vote for him?
Click to expand...

I suggest googling "Obama political experience," or perhaps just going to his wiki page before continuing to make a fool of yourself.
 
Mason66 said:
I think Trump did OK when he went to meet the Mexican President.

There was no international incident.

Now Hillary rebuffed the invitation which could cause an incident.

I guess the President didn't offer enough money for her to appear.
Click to expand...

Yeah, there's that, given her history of pay to play, as well as you'll never really know what her position is on anything, and have to ask and wonder, 'Is this her public position? Or her private position?'

No, Hillary is worse than Trump in that she will sell POTUS to the highest bidder. She's done that with SOS, and 'what difference does it make?'
 
Mason66 said:
Do you not have your own eyes?

I certainly do.

When Obama came on the scene I thought, empty suit.

I can't for the life of me figure out why people got so excited about a guy that quit his first term as a US Senator to run for President.

He had no administrative experience.

He had no executive experience.

He had no experience of any kind to prepare him for the job, so why did so many people vote for him?
Click to expand...

'Oh the historic moment when we self inflicted guild ridden white liberals can make everything better by electing a black president'.

Yeah, that. And they are about to do it again for much the same reasons except with a crooked rich and out of touch lying white woman.
 
eohrnberger said:
'Oh the historic moment when we self inflicted guild ridden white liberals can make everything better by electing a black president'.

Yeah, that. And they are about to do it again for much the same reasons except with a crooked rich and out of touch lying white woman.
Click to expand...

We've already tried crooked rich and out of touch lying white men.
 
eohrnberger said:
'Oh the historic moment when we self inflicted guild ridden white liberals can make everything better by electing a black president'. Yeah, that. And they are about to do it again for much the same reasons except with a crooked rich and out of touch lying white woman.
Click to expand...

Oh the historic moment when we self inflicted victim card playing lower middle class low info white rabid righties, who believed the Con propaganda machine of loving platitudes and promises of a strong/great 'Merica 'again'. Clutching Bibles (some only in thought) and demanding us to do what THEY think the Founders would have us do think they can make everything better by electing carny pitch men....

First a borax pitchman now a rise and fall real estate 'baron'... well ok, the second one will not be elected and will be more remembered for his epic fails- wonder what memes will follow the Orange guy around after he fails so badly come November... :peace
 
Thorgasm said:
We've already tried crooked rich and out of touch lying white men.
Click to expand...

That's fair. So why not try the DC outsider? Rather than the corrupt DC insider?
 
TurtleDude said:
lighten up dude. It has nothing to do with the fact she is female. Its her nasty personality, her scheming ways, her hatred of men in uniform, her discourteous treatment of those under her, and her using public office to become rich while pretending to care about the poor. There's not a single thing about that asshole I can find worthy of respect or even tolerance for
Click to expand...

Aren;t you being a bit disingenuous? All those things you said pale in comparison to your unfounded fear that she will take your guns away. Isn't that the real truth?
 
eohrnberger said:
And yet, you are the on touting Hillary's 'experience', aren't you?

Failures come at an expense. Hillary's ME failures have cost many lives have cost fortunes. Yet, more than happy to elect her and her corrupt political machine to the highest office.

I'm beginning to be suspicious of your judgement.
Click to expand...

Yes, willingly over Trump. Not happy about it, but that's what it has come down to.
 
Praxas said:
In Trump's case, yes it does.
Click to expand...

How do you think Trump is connected with government corruption?

Mind you this is has already been demonstrated with Hillary.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Yes, willingly over Trump. Not happy about it, but that's what it has come down to.
Click to expand...

Can't say that I'm willing to elect a known corrupt candidate to the highest, most power office in the land.
You don't reduce / eliminate government corruption by electing the corrupt to high office.

I'd rather elect the outsider.
 
In all of the Presidential elections I have participated, this is by far the worse selection to choose from. I neither like Clinton nor Trump.

imo, the best we can hope for is whoever gets elected Congress will be able to keep them in check. As far as Congress, that discussion would be for another thread.
 
eohrnberger said:
How do you think Trump is connected with government corruption?

Mind you this is has already been demonstrated with Hillary.
Click to expand...

/facepalm He is addicted to power, has said he would make it legal to sue the media, has said Clinton should be in jail, the very ESSENCE of corruption.

Why the love for Trump? He has lied the most during this election cycle, why would you believe him?
 
eohrnberger said:
That's fair. So why not try the DC outsider? Rather than the corrupt DC insider?
Click to expand...

Because he is a thin skinned egomaniac who can't solve America's problems with lawsuits. He is divisive. He is petulant. He is a liar.

Oh yeah, he grabs women by the ***** too.
 
At this point I feel like voting for either of the two corporatist political parties and their despised nominees is tantamount to enabling a meth addict...
 
Abbazorkzog said:
At this point I feel like voting for either of the two corporatist political parties and their despised nominees is tantamount to enabling a meth addict...
Click to expand...

if your only option was to have one of those two meth addicts as your leader, which one would you choose?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom