• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who will better protect the US from terror attacks on US soil?

Who will better protect the US from terror attacks on US soil?

  • Total voters
    46
Again, no time to read the whole thread, which I try to do before I post a response, but I was asked to offer an explanation.

Frumpy's foreign policy is something that I can't begin to imagine. He's completely unqualified to be president, in every aspect you can think of. He's a disgusting pig, a product of the collapse of the GOP into a group that has decided it can win the WH only by appealing to nativist ignorance (see, e.g., Caribou Barbie). And what a god damn shame that is. It's made our federal gubmint pretty much completely dysfunctional.

I pray that Clinton wins to keep this POS out of DC and hope that Ryan will tell the teabuggers to take a freakin' hike.
 
Logicman said:
How many did Slick Willie Clinton get? Did Ted Cruz serve in the armed forces? That's history, dude. Move on.
Click to expand...

It's not "history" when he insults somebody who actually did serve and was being tortured by the NVA while Trump stayed home safe and sound in the states.
 
Tigerace117 said:
It's not "history" when he insults somebody who actually did serve and was being tortured by the NVA while Trump stayed home safe and sound in the states.
Click to expand...

Well, when you can trot out a perfect candidate who has never screwed up then you'll have some credibility with this example.
 
Logicman said:
Well, when you can trot out a perfect candidate who has never screwed up then you'll have some credibility with this example.
Click to expand...

It's not just this. It's one thing to screw up occasionally---- it's another to constantly be screwing up
 
_Sal said:
no?

I predict those within your country which he has disenfranchised and the already marginalized will band together

I predict race wars and great harm

and then there will come the attacks from outside of your country

everything the tightie righties fear this idiot will bring to bear

I believe so
Click to expand...

I think you hit on what has happened in Europe. Maybe if Europe had more conservative thinkers in charge they could have avoided some of the terrorist attacks. Just a thought.
 
Clinton and the Democrats will maintain the NSA.

Trump would at least weaken it's effectiveness at surveillance if not disband it all together. Edward Snowden and the "freedom lovers" would rejoice. "He who sacrifices a little freedom to gain a little safety deserves to be neither free nor safe", or whatever the exact phase is.
 
clownboy said:
Yes. They'll placate her because of the position she holds and then turn right around and do whatever they were going to do in the first place. With Trump they'll be afraid of the consequences.
Click to expand...

AT least Obama was a freshman, Trump is in grade school. What will happen is in every situation trump will get walked all over since his business skills mean nothing when it comes to diplomacy. He would be treated like the noob that he is; a joke. Just like how Putin treats Obama...
 
Grand Mal said:
That's pretty simple, isn't it? If they're in sight, some politician has failed. If you're having to protect yourself from terrorists you've been abandoned by people who took your money because they were supposed to keep that threat at bay. You're responsible for protecting yourself from the criminals down the block but not from international operatives. Unless all those people who died on 9/11 failed in their responsibility. Unless all those people at the Boston Marathon failed in their responsibility. Unless all those people in that nightclub etcetra, etcetra.
Click to expand...

Not all the people on 9/11 failed in their responsibility. There's a monument in Shanksville, PA to those who took their responsibility to heart.
 
JANFU said:
Who will better protect the US from terror attacks on US soil?

Trump -Why
Clinton -Why
Click to expand...

Neither. Both gain to stand by its proliferation. The corporations that fund Clinton profit well from war and Trump is no stranger to such shenanigans. Plus it plays right into his racist rhetoric.

There is much power in fear.
 
Clinton like Obama will try a diplomatic approach first , will not antagonize countries and people with name calling .which serves absolutely no purpose. and use drones instead of putting American soldiers on the ground to show our power.if needed. its not what you do it is how you do it to accomplish what is needed .. trump is a jr high school kid. just listen how he talks. I have never seen a ceo or a person in power talk like him... he has no class at all.. funny thing is the average boss could never talk to his employees the way trump talks they would get sued by the employee and the labor board
 
Clinton. I have no love for the woman, but I'm confident that she'd know what she'd be doing. Trump, on the other hand, would literally be a loose cannon, and you can't predict a loose cannon. He may end up saving the ship or sinking it, and both scenarios are equally acceptable to him so long as he gets his ego stroked. There's nothing more dangerous than a cretin heavily inebriated on delusions of grandeur.
 
Logicman said:
He's earned more money than you'll ever see. He lives in a nicer place, has a jet you'd probably die for, a helicopter, nice cars, multiple high rise investments, and is the pick of the litter of GOP voters for the nomination. So too bad for you.
Click to expand...

Nope- To bad for the country.
 
Lutherf said:
Not all the people on 9/11 failed in their responsibility. There's a monument in Shanksville, PA to those who took their responsibility to heart.
Click to expand...

No, don't do that. The heroic efforts of some doesn't mean that the others failed in their responsibility. In no way was 9/11 a failure on the part of anyone but the government charged with preventing it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom