• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was Trump right to attack this judge?

Was Trump right to attack this judge?


  • Total voters
    71
So afraid to put his thoughts on the table. Still believing he is not as obvious as daylight. I can't respect somebody who isn't open about their political beliefs. You should feel bad you've been reduced to posting pictures.


Sent from a flower watered by the tears of Trump supporters and crazy newb liberals.

Do you have any other arguments besides labelling anyone you disagree with as racist?
 
Do you have any other arguments besides labelling anyone you disagree with as racist?

And just like that, he switches back to posting using letters because I told him he had become predictable. I really am disappointed. If you don't think racial segregation is a bit racist even when half serious, you really 'are' lost. Please tell us how oppressed white people are. Got any murder rate statistics you want to share? :)


Sent from a flower watered by the tears of Trump supporters and crazy newb liberals.
 
And just like that, he switches back to posting using letters because I told him he had become predictable. I really am disappointed. If you don't think racial segregation is a bit racist even when half serious, you really 'are' lost. Please tell us how oppressed white people are. Got any murder rate statistics you want to share? :)


Sent from a flower watered by the tears of Trump supporters and crazy newb liberals.

Can you solve this puzzle inspector?

3542_0.461701001374021897_hand_21.jpg


toe-clipart-toebwunlabeled_p.png

maxresdefault.jpg

400956049.jpg





Lololo
 

And he goes back to pictures. I really am disappointed that you would react this way to you being asked for your ideas. Why not just voice them? It's like pulling teeth out with you. Segregating courts by race, zika something something ban immigrants. What else do you have that is a definitive idea of your own creation?


Sent from a flower watered by the tears of Trump supporters and crazy newb liberals.
 
I think Trump's wrong in saying "when Mexico sends people here." The people come here on their own because there's fewer opportunities in Mexico. Is he racist? Maybe, maybe not, but we have every right to control our border just like Mexico and every other country controls their borders. Looks like Trump is the only one interested in border control so I'm for Trump.
 
I personally appreciate it when people speak their minds, even if its offensive.

Blunt talk is clearly Mr. Trump's signature. However, I also feel free to call a spade a spade. His continued racial baiting is more than a bit offending.
I'm not interested in PC talk. But hate speech that ridicules ethnic groups needs to be called out in a democratic republic.

Being of Hispanic roots has made me especially sensitive to racial slurs, prejudice and insensitivity.
Trump seems willing to say anything in order to gain media exposure.
Reminds me of the early days of the young Nazi Party when few stood up in Germany to call hate speech for what it was and is.
May this guy never have the support of American voters in order to gain national office.
 
A Mexican and a "hater".

In fact he stated that "he believes he is Mexican" WTH would you even put that out there if you do not know for sure. And the "hater" crap? WTH?

I am curious, is Trump's lawyer trying to ditch the judge?

Nope. Lawyers who attack judges based on their ethnicity face consequences.

Socrates1 said:
The focus is protecting ILLEGALS from deportation and advancing Mexicans . And A judge is required to obey ALL laws , even the ones he disagrees with !!

You know what's ironic about that argument? One of it's supporters within the judicial system (who is willing to openly contradict, for example, SCOTUS Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg, as well as the President) is Judge Curiel :D

Hatuey said:
AlbqOwl said:
All Trump-haters call him racist. Yet nobody has yet posted a single example in its full context and with qualifications he has made that qualifies as racist. Anybody can cherry pick a word or phrase out of its full context and dishonestly make it look terrible. I prefer to discuss these things with people who do not do that.
... Lol... he posted... false and racist... propaganda... from a well known... racist twitter account... how often do you do that?

It's not actually that no one can post examples of Trump saying racist things. It's that no one can post examples of Trump saying racist things that his followers are not willing to excuse.
 
AlbqOwl, what is retweeting? How is it different than a news feed? I'm seriously concerned that you have no clue what it is you're discussing so you've turned on the victim act.

Yup. "PC", "He Fights", "You Just Hate Him". She did the same thing to me when I pointed out that her claim that Judge Curiel had endorsed Hillary for President this year was effectively baseless.
 
Nope. Lawyers who attack judges based on their ethnicity face consequences.



You know what's ironic about that argument? One of it's supporters within the judicial system (who is willing to openly contradict, for example, SCOTUS Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg, as well as the President) is Judge Curiel :D

And it maybe because most Latinos refer to Obama as the Deporter-in Chief . :lamo And when haven't you seen liberals behave in a hypocritical manner ? :shock: :lamo :lamo
 
Nope. Lawyers who attack judges based on their ethnicity face consequences.

You know what's ironic about that argument? One of it's supporters within the judicial system (who is willing to openly contradict, for example, SCOTUS Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg, as well as the President) is Judge Curiel :D

And it maybe because most Latinos refer to Obama as the Deporter-in Chief . :lamo And when haven't you seen liberals behave in a hypocritical manner ? :shock: :lamo :lamo

No more commonly than for "conservatives".

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Blunt talk is clearly Mr. Trump's signature. However, I also feel free to call a spade a spade. His continued racial baiting is more than a bit offending.
I'm not interested in PC talk. But hate speech that ridicules ethnic groups needs to be called out in a democratic republic.

Being of Hispanic roots has made me especially sensitive to racial slurs, prejudice and insensitivity.
Trump seems willing to say anything in order to gain media exposure.
Reminds me of the early days of the young Nazi Party when few stood up in Germany to call hate speech for what it was and is.
May this guy never have the support of American voters in order to gain national office.

Would you rather Trump show his true colors or conceal them and possibly win the White House with Hispanic support?
 
I am glad Trump said what he thought (of course, I think he is being silly).

But I shudder to think what will happen to the press/judiciary if he ever becomes POTUS...probably the same crap and paranoia that Nixon spewed forth while in office.
 
He called a judge who was born in Indiana, is undeniably a U.S. citizen a Mexican. Of course, Donald is stupid enough to not understand what he says.
 
From the NY Times story:

Gerónimo Gutiérrez, Mexico's under secretary for North American affairs, said the guide was written to dissuade people from making a clandestine journey or at least to warn them of the perils and legal risks should they decide to go. About 1.5 million copies of the guide were printed and distributed throughout the country in December.

"Just last year over 300 Mexicans died in their attempt to enter the United States, the vast majority if not all of them in search of a job," Mr. Gutiérrez said. "The Mexican government obviously has an obligation to take all actions possible in order to avoid the loss of life."

He added, "It is a natural and fair response to consider this as an attempt to promote undocumented immigration, but that is absolutely not the intent of the Mexican government."
 
Would you rather Trump show his true colors or conceal them and possibly win the White House with Hispanic support?

Are you kidding?? I am very glad that Trump says whatever is on his mind at any given time. I hope American's repudiate this deranged candidate and send him back to TV reality.
What I find more appalling is the number of voter citizens who excuse this maniac's candidacy. I find it very concerning to hear folks say there is little difference between voting for
Ms Clinton (yes, with all her baggage) and Trump who truly believes the entire universe revolves around himself. Whatever else Clinton may be, she is well schooled in our global realities,
understands how Washington is supposed to work, and is experienced on the global diplomatic stage. Meanwhile, Trump is a blowhard, loud mouthed bully who has exhibited a tone deaf ear
when it comes to any international complexity.
 
Was he right to call the judge a Mexican? Well, of course, he was factually wrong but that's certainly nothing new for Donald Trump. He's facing another loss in court at a bad time for him. He won't win at trial so he has to do something. At the worst, when he loses he has already set the stage for blaming the judge.

Keep in mind that Donald Trump has no sense of honesty, honor, decency, or fairness. He has no ethics. This is a man who brags about bribing politicians, asserts "truthful hyperbole", an obvious oxymoron, and a guiding principle. And thinks there is no such thing as too greedy. He's mad.
 
... liberals are born hypocrites ! :lamo

Using simple-minded broad generalities to vilify entire groups of tens of millions of fellow citizens may be a great way for folks to entertain themselves, but
it simply further undermines our willingness to enter into honest, open discourse about ways of making our nation MORE democratic.

It is this need to assign white hats to "good guys" and black hats to "bad guys" that undermines thoughtful discourse that might lead to better solutions
to our nation's many challenges.

IMO, it doesn't help American culture -- or our national future -- to use a broad brush to lump together massive groups such as calling all liberals hypocrites.
Your simplistic smear doesn't advance much needed solutions to our issues any more than others lumping together all conservatives as anti-civil rights racists.
 
Using simple-minded broad generalities to vilify entire groups of tens of millions of fellow citizens may be a great way for folks to entertain themselves, but
it simply further undermines our willingness to enter into honest, open discourse about ways of making our nation MORE democratic.

It is this need to assign white hats to "good guys" and black hats to "bad guys" that undermines thoughtful discourse that might lead to better solutions
to our nation's many challenges.

IMO, it doesn't help American culture -- or our national future -- to use a broad brush to lump together massive groups such as calling all liberals hypocrites.
Your simplistic smear doesn't advance much needed solutions to our issues any more than others lumping together all conservatives as anti-civil rights racists.

Well isn't that EXACTLY what liberal democrats do with gun control , Affirmative Action , and quotas ??? Are all gun owners killers ? Are all whites privileged ??
 
Would you rather Trump show his true colors or conceal them and possibly win the White House with Hispanic support?

Not at all. I'm glad Trump seems to have no verbal monitor. I'd rather see ALL candidates express their truest positions on key issues. Good luck with that!
While I realize the essence of politics is to plan strategically and win points via tactical execution, too many pols have sold their souls to win the big money donations that buy our elections.
Americans have allowed special interests -- and corporations which are now legally given the same rights as citizens -- to complete a merger acquisition of America's electoral process,
legislative bodies, state governments, and judicial interpretation of our Constitution.

It is very ironic that Trump's run as a purported billionaire some how makes him an "outsider" vs. the Washington pros. The fact that he owns (or leases) aircraft bearing his name seems to buy him much of his support from populist leaning folks. Yet these are the same folks who have time and again taken it on the chin whenever Trump has escaped debt by structuring business bankruptcies that left others holding the bag while the Donald escaped with millions of dollars siphoned from his many deals that went South. A true American hero!
 
Well isn't that EXACTLY what liberal democrats do with gun control , Affirmative Action , and quotas ??? Are all gun owners killers ? Are all whites privileged ??

Frankly, I don't think your point holds a drop of truth. I have never heard any reasonably intelligent American say that all gun owners are killers. This is a point I feel sure a vast majority of
Americans can agree on...whether liberal, progressive, Democrat, moderate, Independent, Republican, Green Party.

However, as I said previously, many of us want "solutions". Not simply name calling.
RE: Guns
I think nearly 80% of Americans are in favor of limiting access to military assault rifles, and banning gun sales to folks listed on "no-fly" lists.
A majority of Americans -- not just liberal dems -- want a rational approach to our gun violence epidemic.
I have lots of company on that issue.

RE: Affirmative Action
Again, you're using a mighty big brush painting these laws and legislative changes as "anti-white".
Opening up colleges, job hiring, promotional opportunities, and access to housing to minorities was never predicated on an assumption that all whites are privileged.
And while I understand that many white Americans feel prejudiced against, I am very happy that today more African American, Hispanic American and Asian American citizens
have enjoyed better opportunities thanks in part to Affirmative Action.
 
Frankly, I don't think your point holds a drop of truth. I have never heard any reasonably intelligent American say that all gun owners are killers. This is a point I feel sure a vast majority of
Americans can agree on...whether liberal, progressive, Democrat, moderate, Independent, Republican, Green Party.

However, as I said previously, many of us want "solutions". Not simply name calling.
RE: Guns
I think nearly 80% of Americans are in favor of limiting access to military assault rifles, and banning gun sales to folks listed on "no-fly" lists.
A majority of Americans -- not just liberal dems -- want a rational approach to our gun violence epidemic.
I have lots of company on that issue.

RE: Affirmative Action
Again, you're using a mighty big brush painting these laws and legislative changes as "anti-white".
Opening up colleges, job hiring, promotional opportunities, and access to housing to minorities was never predicated on an assumption that all whites are privileged.
And while I understand that many white Americans feel prejudiced against, I am very happy that today more African American, Hispanic American and Asian American citizens
have enjoyed better opportunities thanks in part to Affirmative Action.

RE : Guns , nice to make up stats perhaps it was 80 % were AGAINST any type of gun control . 99% of gun owners are responsible law-abiding citizens that never commit crimes with their guns . The problem with most democrats is they NEVER want to deal with the REAL problem and always try to find ways to limit the Constitutional rights of ALL citizens because they simply are too incompetent to deal with the few . Where are all the murders happening , which Cities ? Who is in control of those Cities ?
As far as Affirmative Action , it is based solely on race , it assumes 18 year old whites are the privileged ones , and every other 18 year old minority has been denied . Many whites are children of immigrants that came here to better their lives and never were granted favors , they only worked hard and received very good grades so they could go to a great college , only to see their hopes dashed because liberals think some 18 year old was denied an opportunity . Discrimination is discrimination !
 
Back
Top Bottom