- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 49,566
- Reaction score
- 55,190
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Do natural rights exist?
Generally speaking, the social contract is constructed for the purpose of preserving natural rights. For example, it's easier to assert your right to life if, as a society, you organize groups to hunt mammoth, gather grain and defend the village from barbarians. Maintaining an equitable distribution of labor and resolving disputes related to that distribution result in government as a means to accomplish that task. Government then establishes laws and civil rights which grant privilege and/or institute penalties for abuses of natural rights. In extreme cases a government may decide that recognizing natural rights makes managing the individual interests of the citizens too complex. When that happens they often choose to suppress those rights in favor of a wholly managed society. Since natural rights still exist people tend to resist that suppression and, in the interests of managing of their society, government then exercises force against the "dissidents".
Greetings, Lutherf. :2wave:
While I agree 100 percent with your definition of rights as most countries define them, North Korea and other countries ruled by despots don't see them as "natural rights," or they would not repress their people the way they do. When a general can be executed because a missile launch fails, or their leader has an uncle he disagrees with, as examples, I can only hope there is a very hot place in Hell reserved in that leader's name! Why doesn't the UN do something for the people that are forced to exist in a horror of a country like that? :thumbdown: :2mad:
Generally speaking, the social contract is constructed for the purpose of preserving natural rights. For example, it's easier to assert your right to life if, as a society, you organize groups to hunt mammoth, gather grain and defend the village from barbarians. Maintaining an equitable distribution of labor and resolving disputes related to that distribution result in government as a means to accomplish that task. Government then establishes laws and civil rights which grant privilege and/or institute penalties for abuses of natural rights. In extreme cases a government may decide that recognizing natural rights makes managing the individual interests of the citizens too complex. When that happens they often choose to suppress those rights in favor of a wholly managed society. Since natural rights still exist people tend to resist that suppression and, in the interests of managing of their society, government then exercises force against the "dissidents".