• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who do you THINK will be our next president, not want, but think?

Who do you THINK will be our next president, not want, but think?

  • Total voters
    83
Its Clinton,

No one else competing at this time is as sane.
 
AGENT J said:
I think our next president will be Hillary.
I think no matter who the nominee is for the GOP there will be 3 people running. Hilary, the GOP nominee and one other runner who will end up stealing votes from each other.
Even if its not 3 people running, when it comes to america voting I dont think Trump or Cruz could ever win against who ever the Dem is.
Click to expand...

i agree, given the cannibalism within the repubs that the runner up with go independent and steal votes. The only way this doesn't happen is if trump picks ted cruz as running mate, but with all the vitriol of late and trump's truly unprecedented ego, i don't see it. Cruz will run 3rd party cause the establishment despises trump, and just to show future candidates to make the threat trump did from the onset of running 3rd party
 
TurtleDude said:
well the people I know who know her were secret service agents and FBI agents etc and they despise her
Click to expand...

you really jump the shark on this one

not remotely believable
 
TurtleDude said:
Dems will vote for whomever the party nominates no matter what
Click to expand...

incorrect, youth vote won't turn out at all if it's hillary. If sanders gets the nom, he'll win for same reasons obama did
 
Here's my prognosis of the entire elections cycle:

On the democratic side of the raging primaries, Sanders will soon enough defy the purported odds and win the democratic nomination, precipitating the end of liberalism in the U.S. The republican primaries, however, will drag on, with Trump leading but Cruz catching up to him. An impasse will ensue; the desperate republican establishment will be compelled to strike a deal with the silver medalist Cruz who, despite his estrangement from the party, remains closer to its ethos. While that won't be enough to topple Trump, it'll be enough to force him to strike a deal, realizing that he can't defy the republican establishment forever or do without the evangelical vote that Cruz as his VP would ensure. It'll be a win-for-all situation that out of extreme schism will beget a united republican party. Trump gets to be president, Cruz advances his political career and consolidates his position in the republican field after having been a fringe politician, and the republican establishment capitalizes on Trump's populism and his ability to not only win the independent vote, but even steal democratic vote such as blue-collar democrats.

In the eve of the general elections, the divisive democratic primaries will have begotten a factious democratic base that will in part desert Sanders. Whether wittingly or unwittingly, the Sanders' campaign will have irrevocably alienated a big chunk of the democratic base, and his extreme anti-establishment rhetoric and unwavering populism will leave him out in the wind without the democratic establishment's support. He'll be sodomized in the presidential debates, and the republican propaganda machine will bring him to heel.

November will witness one of the most decisive wins American presidential elections ever witnessed. Republicans will then proceed to reconstitute the state's identity, and the once seemingly indestructible liberalism will be reduced to a peripheral and decadent club of disillusioned and self-important louts stuck in an infinite loop of liberal twaddle.
 
chromium said:
incorrect, youth vote won't turn out at all if it's hillary. If sanders gets the nom, he'll win for same reasons obama did
Click to expand...

And Hilary's base won't turn out at all if it's Sanders, which is precisely why democrats are screwed no matter who wins the nomination.
 
chromium said:
i agree, given the cannibalism within the repubs that the runner up with go independent and steal votes. The only way this doesn't happen is if trump picks ted cruz as running mate, but with all the vitriol of late and trump's truly unprecedented ego, i don't see it. Cruz will run 3rd party cause the establishment despises trump, and just to show future candidates to make the threat trump did from the onset of running 3rd party
Click to expand...

No one is guilty of political cannibalism but democrats. Republicans may tear viciously at each other in the primaries, but I assure you they'll turn up in droves on election day to avenge conservatism and ravage liberalism in retaliation to the past few years of what they perceive as liberal tyranny and perversion of the Original State. Democrats, on the other hand, are flaunting such political cannibalism by saying "Bernie or Bust".
 
I'd like to change my answer to Hillary.

And I'd like to reserve a rubber room for myself now, because I'll need it if she becomes POTUS.
 
tres borrachos said:
I'd like to change my answer to Hillary.

And I'd like to reserve a rubber room for myself now, because I'll need it if she becomes POTUS.
Click to expand...

Bring plenty of popcorn and chocolate and LIQUOR. I am coming with you.
 
tres borrachos said:
I'd like to change my answer to Hillary.

And I'd like to reserve a rubber room for myself now, because I'll need it if she becomes POTUS.
Click to expand...

Lovebug said:
Bring plenty of popcorn and chocolate and LIQUOR. I am coming with you.
Click to expand...

Make that a triple of everything....I'm joining you in the rubber room if she wins.
 
chromium said:
incorrect, youth vote won't turn out at all if it's hillary. If sanders gets the nom, he'll win for same reasons obama did
Click to expand...

I'd love to see sanders as the nominee because it would prove that the Democrats are mainly socialists
 
chromium said:
you really jump the shark on this one

not remotely believable
Click to expand...

how old were you when Clinton was in the Whitehouse? I was with DOJ the entire Clinton Presidency. She was well known as treating military and Federal LE as peasants. In texas, she grabbed Chelsea's arm and told her they didn't have time for the "help" when the base commander introduced Chelsea to a Medal of Honor winner who was part of the honor guard. Cankles had the long time White House Steward fired for maintaining a friendship with GWHB's wife

she's scum to people below her
 
The election is still much too far away to say with any certainty, but currently it does seem to be shaping up to be Clinton.
 
Complete F-If-I-Know



I voted for Ted Cruz. Not because I think he's likely, but because I think he's plausible. Trump is plausible, Hillary is plausible. Trump is the least likely to win the General, however, followed by Hillary, followed by Cruz, hence my vote.
 
AGENT J said:
This is about what you think will happen on election day, who will be elected our next president, its not based on who you will vote for or what you want sooooooooo . . .

Who do you THINK will be our next president, not want, but think?

Clinton
Cruz
Kasich
Rubio
Sanders
Trump
Other

*** I ASKED MODS TO ADD TRUMP***
left him off by mistake
Click to expand...

The only possibilities are Trump, Clinton, or Sanders. Ted Cruz is not going to beat Trump and he would never defeat Clinton or Sanders. The other candidates are non-entities at this point.
 
ernst barkmann said:
sorry i am cant any government built on force i am opposed to.

any government which has all power into one single entity is an evil government
Click to expand...

So you're an anarchist? Because government in its basic form is technically "force".
 
I would peg the chances at 8 out of 10 it would be Clinton.
Trump gets 1 out of 10 as does Bernie.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So you're an anarchist? Because government in its basic form is technically "force".
Click to expand...

sorry thats wrong, an anarchist would to me mean no government.

i support a federal government which has limited powers per the constitution.

the form of government the constitution creates is a negative force concerning the people, not a positive force.

any government which uses law to apply force to people, who have not violated rights or threaten the public is unjust.
 
ernst barkmann said:
sorry thats wrong, an anarchist would to me mean no government.
Click to expand...
Government=force

i support a federal government which has limited powers per the constitution.

the form of government the constitution creates is a negative force concerning the people, not a positive force.

any government which uses law to apply force to people, who have not violated rights or threaten the public is unjust.
Click to expand...
Social democracy is compatible with our constitution.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Government=force


Social democracy is compatible with our constitution.
Click to expand...

how is government of our constitution force, explain, where this is in the constitution?

the founders created a constitution, to prevent the collective capacity of the people from making laws as stated in federalist #63
 
For a few years now, I have said "Hillary is your next president."
This was mainly because the Republicans weren't even talking about anyone of substance on their end.
Then I heard Trump was running and it made me laugh harder...THIS is what is offered up from the Republicans as substance?
Then it looked like they were serious so I stopped laughing and just shook my head instead.
Then Sanders started to look to have some actual promise.

But you know what? I just have a sinking suspicion that my initial assessment is still accurate. It isn't that she is by any means a great candidate or even an adequate one. There just seems to be (at the risk of sounding a conspiracy theorist) some force that wants her to win the election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom