• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which Republicans actually want to vote for trump?

As a Republican, will you vote for Trump?


  • Total voters
    34
You know I really don't care about Trump for the exact same reason I don't care about Hillary. And that would be for all the things you just mentioned but with Hillary they are ten fold over trump. Did you forget she is under investigation now by the FBI? Who could but the Kkabbash on Hillary's candidacy anytime they want.
The difference is Hillary is part of the establishment and the establishment wants a female president. It doesn't matter what we think of Hillary because she knows DC politics and will hit the ground running as if she had been the veep for the last 8 years. She will also twist arms and crack heads of anyone who gets in her way. The Donald doesn't have it in him to play DC big league contact sport. Trump is more like Sarah Palin who will quit half way through the game and go where the money is.
 
The difference is Hillary is part of the establishment and the establishment wants a female president. It doesn't matter what we think of Hillary because she knows DC politics and will hit the ground running as if she had been the veep for the last 8 years. She will also twist arms and crack heads of anyone who gets in her way. The Donald doesn't have it in him to play DC big league contact sport. Trump is more like Sarah Palin who will quit half way through the game and go where the money is.

Give it up.
 
I won't vote since I'm against democracy, but Trump is definitely the most interesting candidate this election since he's the only one really willing to do anything about the border.
 
I'll try. Ridiculously wealthy bankers and royal families operate the Fed, which is outside of government control, which allows them to get even richer, while the rest of us get poorer via inflation. Illustrating this perfectly is the TARP bailouts, that went to the banks that were considered "too big to fail." An admitted socialist, such as Bernard, surely has a flow chart at his disposal of the multitude of so called "free" programs and other giveaways he intends to make readily avaliable, while claiming that the "wealthy, or 1%" will foot the bill. Wrong! If you're even remotely familiar with economics, it won't take too long to come to the conclusion that when a socialist claims that the "wealthy" will pay, what they are not telling you is that it is code for everyone. You see, even the poorest of the poor in this country are deemed "wealthy", when compared to the rest of the world's population.

With a Sanders bloke in control of where and how much money is being spent, the big bankers will get hard-ons at the prospect of making themselves many times richer by printing more money to prop up his bloated programs.

That's a good detail that's overlooked about socialism. Socialism ends up helping the elite. It's no accident that everytime the state has become a central figure in the economy that the largest beneficiaries are those who have the most wealth in the economy in the first place.

I'd also add that in connection to that, the Sanders agenda would require higher taxes and more government - which would hurt the working class hardest, while the elites would be able to leverage connections and expertise to manage the new programs and salvage their own hides and money while we would be hit the hardest. The irony of socialism, it usually starts out as a call to help the working and ends, invariably, with benefiting the corporations and elites as they corner the benefits and deny everyone it. (Then we start the whole parade all over again).
 
Yes, I would vote for Ben Carson over Hillary Clinton. That, BTW, has nothing to do with the Far Right.

A) Then you are a fool, and B) it has everything to do with the Far Right. Your hatred of Clinton renders you incapable of making a rational choice. So much for any reasonable political discussion.
 
You're ignoring that Hillary is a truly awful candidate. Now I wouldn't vote for Carson over Hillary but I understand why other poeple would. Take the blinders off...Hillary is a bad candidate.

Hey, I'm not a big fan of Hilary. There's lots of candidates I'd prefer. But if she's my alternative to a Carson or Trump Presidency, there's no choice.
 
The truth about Trump being a thin skin cry baby like Sarah Palin is what hurts you conservatives.

Geeee give it up. I could care about Trump, yet you're obsessed with him. Move on to a subject that really matters.
 
Geeee give it up. I could care about Trump, yet you're obsessed with him. Move on to a subject that really matters.
The thread is about Trump but I do understand why republicans don't want to talk about their candidates.
 
Back
Top Bottom