• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How many times should Benghazi be investigated?

How many times should Benghazi be investigated?

  • Three times, 'cause double jeopardy just ain't enough.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Five times, one for each digit on my hand.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    36
the really crazy part is.... you actually believe that.

there's not a dimes worth of difference between the loyalist bases.... they're both deluded into believing they are superior to the other.

Well in reality, one parties "base" actually IS superior. The other's base likes Trump *shaking head*
 
Last edited:
Gotta prove SOMETHING bad happened under the next Dem Prez of the US. After all Obama has taken US from an economy dumping 700,000+ jobs a months to a 67 month period where over 12+ million private sector jobs were created. No 9/11 type attack on US and we are finally digging out of the hole the GOP tried to keep US in after 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies!

Tyranny! Obama's destroying the nation!!!!
 
There have been seven investigations (of Benghazi) led mostly by Republicans in the Congress" that concluded "nobody did anything wrong, but there were changes we could make."

— Hillary Clinton on Monday, October 5th, 2015 in on NBC's Today Show


rulings%2Ftom-mostlytrue.gif



Clinton: 7 Benghazi probes so far | PolitiFact

Benghazi-Press-Kit_Widespread-Criticism.png

nice.. I see idiot Hillary supports have their own Benghazi website set up to push her propagada..... that's so very original.

so tell me, why are you afraid of hillary having to answer questions?... how are you personally harmed by any this.... explain your butthurt.
 
Well in reality, one parties "base" actually IS superior. The other's base like Trump *shaking head*

no... no one is superior.... you're just deluded into thinking your **** doesn't stink.

ignorant bigotry is ignorant.
 
there's only been 1 investigation... they've had 8 hearings as part of that investigation , though.

Wrong. You can't call them all one investigation when they're conducted by wholly-different committees:

7: Number of prior congressional investigations into the Benghazi tragedy.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. [“Interim Report on the Accountability Review Board,” Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 9/16/13]
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. [“Flashing Red: A Special Report on the Terrorist Attack at Benghazi,” the Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs 12/30/12]
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. [“Review of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012,” Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 1/15/14]
House Committee on Foreign Affairs. [“Benghazi: Where is the State Department Accountability?,” Majority Staff Report – House Foreign Affairs Committee, 2/7/14]
House Committee on the Judiciary. [Interim Progress Report on Benghazi Investigation, 4/23/13]
House Committee on Armed Services. [“Armed Services Committee slams White House on Benghazi,” USA Today, 2/11/14]
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. [“Investigative Report on the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012,” House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 11/21/14]


you can save your breath, I won't ever be butthurt by congressional hearings into the actions of officials... it's just not gonna happen...I welcome each and every one of them, bar none.

and really, you being butthurt has everything to do with party affialtion.. 100%.
if a Republican had his/her ass in a congressional sling, you'd be braying on about how good it is.....that's what hyperpartisans do.

Hillary's gotten none of the ass-covering that Dubya's attorney general gave him, particularly when it came to the "torture is legal" decision.

No, guy, all Hillary's done is put up with over a year's worth of hyperpartisan attacks by the GOP...because they're scared of her. They know they've got nobody to beat her when it comes to the general election, and they're doing everything they can to tear her down ahead of time.
 
nice.. I see idiot Hillary supports have their own Benghazi website set up to push her propagada..... that's so very original.

so tell me, why are you afraid of hillary having to answer questions?... how are you personally harmed by any this.... explain your butthurt.


Glad you accept there has been EIGHT DIFFERENT INVESTIGATIONS on Benghazi in the GOP Congress and 7 so far have found SQUAT.

Hillary answered all questions, if you mean why doesn't she admit Obama is nothing but a Kenyan, Marxist whose name isn't Obama, you'd have to ask a low informed GOP supporter that question!
 
no... no one is superior.... you're just deluded into thinking your **** doesn't stink.

ignorant bigotry is ignorant.

Reality is reality.

One base "believes" you can cut taxes and get more revenues

One base understands math and reasoning...
 
Wrong. You can't call them all one investigation when they're conducted by wholly-different committees:

7: Number of prior congressional investigations into the Benghazi tragedy.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. [“Interim Report on the Accountability Review Board,” Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 9/16/13]
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. [“Flashing Red: A Special Report on the Terrorist Attack at Benghazi,” the Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs 12/30/12]
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. [“Review of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012,” Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 1/15/14]
House Committee on Foreign Affairs. [“Benghazi: Where is the State Department Accountability?,” Majority Staff Report – House Foreign Affairs Committee, 2/7/14]
House Committee on the Judiciary. [Interim Progress Report on Benghazi Investigation, 4/23/13]
House Committee on Armed Services. [“Armed Services Committee slams White House on Benghazi,” USA Today, 2/11/14]
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. [“Investigative Report on the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012,” House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 11/21/14]

fair enough.. i'm not the one butthurt over how many investigations there are, so it doesn't much matter.



Hillary's gotten none of the ass-covering that Dubya's attorney general gave him, particularly when it came to the "torture is legal" decision.
and there ya go... when it's a Republican, you're suddenly interested in accountability.. .when it's your own party.. you ****ing hate it.


No, guy, all Hillary's done is put up with over a year's worth of hyperpartisan attacks by the GOP...because they're scared of her. They know they've got nobody to beat her when it comes to the general election, and they're doing everything they can to tear her down ahead of time.
blablabla.. go team!!
 
Glad you accept there has been EIGHT DIFFERENT INVESTIGATIONS on Benghazi in the GOP Congress and 7 so far have found SQUAT.

Hillary answered all questions, if you mean why doesn't she admit Obama is nothing but a Kenyan, Marxist whose name isn't Obama, you'd have to ask a low informed GOP supporter that question!

Heh. Maybe if the administration could supply the evidence that they are by law required to supply, we could've wrapped the whole enchilada up with the first one. Since the emails continue to dribble out, I guess you're stuck with how ever many investigations it takes to get to the end of this thing. Sucks, I know. Blame yourself, since you seem to be supportive of the obstruction.
 
Heh. Maybe if the administration could supply the evidence that they are by law required to supply, we could've wrapped the whole enchilada up with the first one. Since the emails continue to dribble out, I guess you're stuck with how ever many investigations it takes to get to the end of this thing. Sucks, I know. Blame yourself, since you seem to be supportive of the obstruction.

Obstruction? LMAOROG. The" anti Gubrmnt" types who don't think the Gov't can do ANYTHING right, is OK with spending tens of millions and use 4 dead Americans for political purposes. Shocking
 
Obstruction? LMAOROG. The" anti Gubrmnt" types who don't think the Gov't can do ANYTHING right, is OK with spending tens of millions and use 4 dead Americans for political purposes. Shocking

you're a "liberal".. why the hell are you pretending to care about govt spending or using dead people for political purposes.?
 
Sorry, unlike the GOP base, the Dem base doesn't like to play politics (like voting 40+ times) just to give the theater effect for the base.


GOP base CRAVES this stuff, fear, blame etc

Since the lazy, disinterested liberal wing of my DEM party didn't bother to vote in 2010, it'll be until the 2020 census election at the earliest until DEMs have a shot at undoing the Gerry-Mandered House. GOPs have a far superior ground game and overwhelmed Kaine in 2010 and DWS in 2014 .
 
you're a "liberal".. why the hell are you pretending to care about govt spending or using dead people for political purposes.?

Since when does being a "liberal" equate to a person being bad, Rushbo?

Their blood is as red as yours in battle .
 
Obstruction? LMAOROG. The" anti Gubrmnt" types who don't think the Gov't can do ANYTHING right, is OK with spending tens of millions and use 4 dead Americans for political purposes. Shocking

The government had to be sued to release the information, however grudgingly it has been supplied. The government spent $535 million on Solyndra. Tell me where that got us.
 
Heh. Maybe if the administration could supply the evidence that they are by law required to supply, we could've wrapped the whole enchilada up with the first one. Since the emails continue to dribble out, I guess you're stuck with how ever many investigations it takes to get to the end of this thing. Sucks, I know. Blame yourself, since you seem to be supportive of the obstruction.

Unless the administration can hand over evidence that can indict Clinton, you GOPs won't be satisfied.

Too bad you didn't feel this way over 9/11 and all the embassy attacks that killed Americans during Bush/Cheney.

And too bad DEMs didn't throw Reagan's ass in jail .
 
The government had to be sued to release the information, however grudgingly it has been supplied. The government spent $535 million on Solyndra. Tell me where that got us.

Yer digging deep with Sokyndra--how about a little Fast and Furious while yer at it ?
 
Since when does being a "liberal" equate to a person being bad, Rushbo?

Their blood is as red as yours in battle .

oh hello there my stalinist buddy.

if one is going to spew ignorant bull****, they oughta be prepared to have it thrown back in their face.

I wouldn't know if a liberals blood is red or not... i've never encountered one on the battlefield.... they are usually back home protesting me and my brothers.:cool:
 
Unless the administration can hand over evidence that can indict Clinton, you GOPs won't be satisfied.

Too bad you didn't feel this way over 9/11 and all the embassy attacks that killed Americans during Bush/Cheney.

And too bad DEMs didn't throw Reagan's ass in jail .

is this where you pretend to care about people dying in embassy attacks?

oh that's right... you care about them.. but only when they die under a GOP president
that's what party loyalists do.

face facts, ya'll care about one thing, and one thing only, in this whole mess... Hillary Clinton.
no one else, nothing more.
 
Unless the administration can hand over evidence that can indict Clinton, you GOPs won't be satisfied.

Too bad you didn't feel this way over 9/11 and all the embassy attacks that killed Americans during Bush/Cheney.

And too bad DEMs didn't throw Reagan's ass in jail .

You should review the embassy attacks during Bush. It's not as stunning as you believe. And yes, the Dems should've thrown Reagan in jail. Heh. If you're looking for Hillary to be indicted, you'll need to look to the Obama Justice department. I think the FBI will remain above any partisan behavior. Hmmmm. I wonder what message Biden and Obama were sending?
 
Yer digging deep with Sokyndra--how about a little Fast and Furious while yer at it ?

It's a long list. Feel free to pick and choose what among the huge pool of government waste you prefer.
 
Since the lazy, disinterested liberal wing of my DEM party didn't bother to vote in 2010, it'll be until the 2020 census election at the earliest until DEMs have a shot at undoing the Gerry-Mandered House. GOPs have a far superior ground game and overwhelmed Kaine in 2010 and DWS in 2014 .


You mean the right wing WAYYYYYY outspends the Dems and the GOP won? Shocking


Hint the elderly, tend to vote GOP, they have nothing better to do than get brainwashed by fear the right and specifically Faux uses.



GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority

GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


Senate Democratic minority snagged 20 million more votes than GOP majority

Senate Democratic minority snagged 20 million more votes than GOP majority
 
Why do you lyingly pretend that I pretend, Thrilla?

is this where you pretend to care about people dying in embassy attacks?

oh that's right... you care about them.. but only when they die under a GOP president
that's what party loyalists do.

face facts, ya'll care about one thing, and one thing only, in this whole mess... Hillary Clinton.
no one else, nothing more.

Why do you GOPs only care about one embassy attack under Obama and then state that DEMs are not allowed to bring up or care about the several attacks that occurred under yer party's watch ?
 
Back
Top Bottom