Good idea. I'd actually go one step further, and limit spending to 98% of revenue. That way we can start paying off the debt too.Originally Posted by FallingPianos
Agreed.Originally Posted by FallingPianos
I disagree. This would violate the tenets of freedom of speech. I realize that it would supercede the 1st amendment, but it wouldn't supercede the basic principles behind it.Originally Posted by FallingPianos
Besides, I don't think there's much evidence that money actually influences elections very much, once a candidate passes the threshold of name recognition.