• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which person would you vote for in 2020 if he or she became a republican today?

Which person would you vote for in 2020 if he or she became a republican today?

  • Nancy Pelosi

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Diane Fienstien

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • George Soros if he was born in the US

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Barack Obama if it was possible for him to run for a 3rd term

    Votes: 2 7.1%

  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 2 7.1%

  • Michael Bloomberg

    Votes: 1 3.6%

  • Bill de Blasio

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I would only vote for one of them if they were the republican nominee.

    Votes: 1 3.6%

  • I wouldn't vote for any of them.I do not believe they would actually change

    Votes: 22 78.6%
  • Total voters
    28
None. It isn't just that I don't think they would change, I don't think most people in the GOP today are worth voting for because none of them are actually conservatives in the first place.
 
jamesrage said:
Never? Are you being serious?

The Mitt Romney Deception
Click to expand...

Mass Resistance? Are you serious?

He was the governor of a very liberal state - one of the most liberal states in the country. He governed as a centrist. He is a centrist. I'm also pro-choice and pro-SSM. That doesn't make me a liberal.

You're apparently making the argument that one can only be a Republican if he's pro-life and anti gay rights. That is why people detest Republicans. They are not the only things happening in the world and holding those views don't make you a Republican.
 
tres borrachos said:
Mass Resistance? Are you serious?
Click to expand...

These things can be looked up on other sites if you disagree with the things that they did as governor of Massachusetts.Although I find it amusing that you would question the source when you agree with some of those things Romney supports like abortion and gay marriage.

He was the governor of a very liberal state - one of the most liberal states in the country.
Click to expand...
Which is the excuse people used when voting for that liberal even though they claimed to espouse conservative views and dislike liberal positions.

He governed as a centrist. He is a centrist.
Click to expand...

He governed as a liberal.

I'm also pro-choice and pro-SSM. That doesn't make me a liberal..
Click to expand...
Those are not the only issues Romney is liberal on.
 
jamesrage said:
These things can be looked up on other sites if you disagree with the things that they did as governor of Massachusetts.Although I find it amusing that you would question the source when you agree with some of those things Romney supports like abortion and gay marriage.


Which is the excuse people used when voting for that liberal even though they claimed to espouse conservative views and dislike liberal positions.



He governed as a liberal.


Those are not the only issues Romney is liberal on.
Click to expand...

The don't vote for him.

This was an obvious bait thread. Garbage. And you don't represent Republicans. Not all of them are anti-abortion and anti-SSM. Posts like yours only hurt the GOP.
 
tres borrachos said:
The don't vote for him.
Click to expand...
I do not vote for libs so I did not vote for Romney,

This was an obvious bait thread.
Click to expand...

How is it a bait thread? Many people who espouse conservative beliefs seem intent on voting for RINOs like Mitt Romney and Donald Trump who do a 180 in their political beliefs when they decide that they no longer want to be president. So logic should conclude the following- these people are stupid and therefore should avoid people trying to sell them the deed to the Brooklyn bridge.Or they are party-tards who care so much about their party winning that they would vote for any of the people in the poll options should the conditions described in the OP happen.

Garbage. And you don't represent Republicans. Not all of them are anti-abortion and anti-SSM.
Click to expand...

Those so called republicans are progressives instead of actual republicans.

Posts like yours only hurt the GOP.
Click to expand...
What hurts the GOP is propping up RINOs and suggesting that somehow the GOP should be like the democrat and propping up RINOs.
 
Painter said:
If any of these people became a Republican, I would not vote for them... Period.

I would not vote for Debbie Wasserman Schultz under any circumstances due to her rigid stance against marijuana.
Unfortunately, this sorry excuse for a person represents my own state.

She will not accept my comments because I am not in her exact district, even though I am a Floridian... one more reason I hate her.
Click to expand...

What if she changed her mind and now claimed to support those issues you care about? People change their views all the time.
 
jamesrage said:
Which person would you vote for in 2020 if he or she became a republican today? So if any one of these people had a change of heart,changed their political affiliation to republican and suddenly started espousing conservative and republican views or even "moderate' views who would you vote for in 2020?

Nancy Pelosi
Diane Fienstien
George Soros if he was born in the US
Barack Obama if he was possible for him to run for a 3rd term
Hillary Clinton
Michael Bloomberg
Bill de Blasio
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I would only vote for one of them if they were the republican nominee.
I wouldn't vote for any of them.I do not believe they would actually change
Click to expand...
Thirty years ago I would have voted for Dianne Feinstein. Not today.
 
jamesrage said:
What if she changed her mind and now claimed to support those issues you care about? People change their views all the time.
Click to expand...

Key word - "claimed."

Problem is that as a nation, we've listened and believed far too often in the claims our politicians make. Most of the time we don't do our own due diligence to see if the claims are true or not, whether than have any bases whatsoever in fact - which is one of the reasons our politicians throw out claims so readily and freely.

And the other truth is that for most of the individuals on that list - all of whom btw have lived a lifetime espousing their particular world view in the political arena - and "claims" aside, most don't have the other quality that it'd take for me to even consider them - character.

"Claims" aren't worth the air in which they're delivered, and character doesn't simply change with a change of mind. Both demand a verifiable history of actions to certify their authenticity - and color me skeptical, but for that group of individuals, I find such a premise entirely implausible.
 
jamesrage said:
What if she changed her mind and now claimed to support those issues you care about? People change their views all the time.
Click to expand...

I only care how they vote and make policy.

My worst enemy could become my friend if they changed their views.

I could despise a person and still vote for them if their policy was right.

International Policy comes first. Not how we treat ourselves, but how we treat others we don't care about... this is what defines a man and a Nation.
Secondly I care about personal freedom. Marijuana is top of that list.
 
jamesrage said:
Which person would you vote for in 2020 if he or she became a republican today? So if any one of these people had a change of heart,changed their political affiliation to republican and suddenly started espousing conservative and republican views or even "moderate' views who would you vote for in 2020?

Nancy Pelosi
Diane Fienstien
George Soros if he was born in the US
Barack Obama if he was possible for him to run for a 3rd term
Hillary Clinton
Michael Bloomberg
Bill de Blasio
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I would only vote for one of them if they were the republican nominee.
I wouldn't vote for any of them.I do not believe they would actually change
Click to expand...

I don't believe they would actually change, but Obama would still be the most likely candidate I'd vote for on that list.
 
EdwinWillers said:
Key word - "claimed."

Problem is that as a nation, we've listened and believed far too often in the claims our politicians make. Most of the time we don't do our own due diligence to see if the claims are true or not, whether than have any bases whatsoever in fact - which is one of the reasons our politicians throw out claims so readily and freely.

And the other truth is that for most of the individuals on that list - all of whom btw have lived a lifetime espousing their particular world view in the political arena - and "claims" aside, most don't have the other quality that it'd take for me to even consider them - character.

"Claims" aren't worth the air in which they're delivered, and character doesn't simply change with a change of mind. Both demand a verifiable history of actions to certify their authenticity - and color me skeptical, but for that group of individuals, I find such a premise entirely implausible.
Click to expand...

This has been one of my biggest complaints regarding the American voter for years. Politicians make claims during campaigns that run completely counter to their history, and voters fall for it. WTF?!?

You have years of history of a candidate to look at, and right there is the best indicator of what type of action they're going to do.
 
radcen said:
This has been one of my biggest complaints regarding the American voter for years. Politicians make claims during campaigns that run completely counter to their history, and voters fall for it. WTF?!?

You have years of history of a candidate to look at, and right there is the best indicator of what type of action they're going to do.
Click to expand...

This is what I find irritating. I can understand those who are ignorant when it comes to politics somewhat falling for it.But I would think people on this forum who tend be more knowledgeable about politics than your average person wouldn't fall for it.But they fell for it with Romney.They made excuses and claimed that despite his history that he would somehow be different as president.
 
Seeing how there are still a lot of Trump supporters and I did not feel like making another poll on this subject I decided to resurrect this poll.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom