• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black...[W:16]

When White's commit massacres.

  • Not as serious as Black on black killings?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It's can't be mental if people of color commit it?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .

oncewas

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
797
Reaction score
630
Location
Ky.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Full thread title: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings?

It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.

Maybe it would increase the response to the entry, if you chose different formulations to express, what you want.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Rutabaga.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Rutabaga.

Rutabagas are too good for this thread. Kidney beans, the most evil of all vegetables, is a more reasonable response for this thread.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Rutabagas are too good for this thread. Kidney beans, the most evil of all vegetables, is a more reasonable response for this thread.
Kidney beans?
Brussel sprouts.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Kidney beans?
Brussel sprouts.

Brussel sprouts are teh own! Except when my sister makes them, she puts lemon juice in every ****ing thing. Brussels just need to be steamed with some butter.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.



Always is a long time, especially towards the end.

Why do so many people continue to post total BS threads like this?

:lol:




"The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen." ~ Tommy Smothers
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

It was called a "Masterminded from Milosevic" and "systematic cleansing" when Serbian white people committed massacres, not a "Mental thing."
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

This is another thread that didn't need to be posted.

Why do so many people open their mouth before they turn their brain on?

:lol:
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Brussel sprouts are teh own! Except when my sister makes them, she puts lemon juice in every ****ing thing.
Brussels just need to be steamed with some butter.



I like them with rice.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Rutabagas are too good for this thread. Kidney beans, the most evil of all vegetables, is a more reasonable response for this thread.

I love Kidney beans. I "massacre" them on a regular basis. I think this thread is more thought provoking when considered in terms of Eggplant and Parsnips.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

I'm sure that if I assigned a numeric value to every grammar mistake in this poll, I could probably play the lotto and win.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Brussel sprouts are teh own! Except when my sister makes them, she puts lemon juice in every ****ing thing. Brussels just need to be steamed with some butter.

Butter and a little garlic salt and Parmesan cheese for me. But then again, I like kidney beans.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.

The fact that you are even thinking about this SO much that you thought it necessary to make a (silly) thread about it speaks volumes about your attitude toward African Americans.
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Because White people rule!


Or

Because the two have absolutely nothing to do with one another.

But let me ask you -- If a half Chinese half Mexican who dresses white, speaks an ebonics dialect of Ojibwa, wears a hijab like a do-rag and reeks of curry goes into a gas station and the attendant hides the give a penny take a penny cup when he comes up short a few cents for his Swisher Sweets, pork rinds, and jimmy hats -- Is that attendant a racist?
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Moderator's Warning:
Several posters in this thread...in fact lets be honest. EVERYONE with the exception of posts 1 & 2 in this thread has done nothing but bait and troll this thread. No doubt in an attempt to get this thread flushed. Well guess what...its not going to happen at this time. I would suggest that you all address the topic of the thread or get out of this thread. If you don't then you will be gigged and thread banned. Just because you think that the thread is "silly" or whatever does not give you the excuse to violate the rules of DebatePolitics.com.

Violations of rules before this in-thread may still be addressed with possible infractions going out. IE: You're posts are under review and the Moderation Team will decide if we leave it to just this in-thread or if infractions will indeed be handed out.
 
Last edited:
It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.

What's your question? I've read and reread your poll and I don't see the question unless something about "why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings" is the question. If that's the case, you need a poll for that? White massacres aren't Black on black killings because a white person can't also be black. Or are there a lot of black on black massacres in this country?
 
It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.

Unlike others - I think this is a good question with a very easily-observed state in the media.

It's ignorance about mental illness that drives this forward.

We're used to associating mental illness with violence IF the perpetrator is 'withdrawn from society' maybe a 'recluse' and 'secretly plotting' while they remain 'quiet'.

Being withdrawn from society, quiet, secretly paranoid, 'weird' - People associate THESE 'anti-social' behaviors with mental illness (while overlooking OTHER behaviors that are related to mental illness'). - these are NOT prevalent in various cultures and values that comprise the black community generally speaking.

And so you get this tired and worn out stupidity: He was such a nice guy. (See - being 'nice' overshadows the concept that you're 'mentally ill' or 'simply a time bomb waiting to go off') She was a good mom, I had no idea she'd go off and kill her children. (Because hating children is such a normal thing these days)

People tend to see African Americans as head-strong, solid, and level . . . with just a heavy occasional dose of an attitude problem. (Note how a lot of people who have a heavy dose of an attitude problem are NOT seen - no matter what the race - as being mentally Ill. People don't want to write off 'violently angry' as a mental illness - ever)

Now - I'm from a biracial family . . . and I'm an author . . . so my exposure to things is very different in a strange blend sort of way. Last year a very interesting writing-thread popped up at another community that explains how differently personalities are seen (and not necessarily in a 'racist' sort of way with the intention of being negative or demeaning). This comment here (and I write romance/erotica - so that's what this was about): Why is it that all bdsm stories have white shy women? Why not a robust black woman that just want to be taken and dominated? (and she went on to refer to herself - etc).

And it opened up a huge discussion on racial stereotypes in writing - and in real life - and it was all very interesting.

People simply COULD NOT wrap their minds around a confident, self assured, outgoing, strong-willed female wanting to be dominated OR black male and female dom/sub concepts in general.

I guess it just pushed the reality-button too far gone?

I found it funny - and engaging - and that's what your thread made me think of. White = shy and quiet / possibly off kilter but overall easy to overlook. Black = bold and confident / this is what gets them 'in trouble', in fact. [When people make assumptions and function by default, these are the defaults]

Now white people who are bold, outgoing, daring, vibrant are ALSO assumed to be mentally balanced. This is associated with 'happy' and 'content' with life, not associate with mental instability.

This, in fact, sums up the issues I've had with my son RE his mental illness. People didn't SEE he was mentally ill because he was HAPPY and OUTGOING and just mildly annoying - even though those were symptoms.
 
Last edited:
It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.

People tend to view mass murders as done by crazy people... There is no rational reason to mass murder innocent people... Mass murderers/serial killers/violent psychopaths are all very ... different.

Only example of mass murders that I think may not be the cause of some strange personality disorder is the brainwashed/super religious like jihad suicide bombers.... they are somewhat rational people... just the moral compass they have been introduced to/ I don't really know- but it seems they are people that otherwise would be normal if they were not introduced/sought out/ to this well establish system of evil... for which they do not see as so, but the exact opposite.

Gangstas shooting each other up is not in the category of psychopaths and mass murderers... they do it for money/pride/violent environment/countless other reasons mostly due to bad choices in life.

When a crazy guy shoots up a movie theater just because he doesn't understand the value of life, he is crazy.

White people have normal murders to, plenty of them... so it's not that these mass murders are being considered something else, it's that they ARE something else. There is a difference between killing your wife because you hate her and running down children at a elementary school with a truck because your depressed.

But why do black people get attention for their normal murders???
IT's BECAUSE THEY COMMIT 55% OF THEM IN US AND ONLY COMPRISE OF 14% OF THE POPULATION!!!! THAT IS SIGNIFICANT.... white people are supposed to commit more... but they don't.
 
55 % OR 14 % OF MURDERS,WILL NEVER REPLACE A "GENOCIDE " OF A PEOPLE. BLACKS IN THE USA,DIDN'T COMMIT THAT ACT OF MURDERS. White people did do that in the USA.
:2wave:
 
It's always called a mental thing by the media, when White's commit massacres.

I am trying to discern this in the English language from whatever variation of English this is written in.

"It is always called a mental thing by the media when Caucasians commit mass murders ... ."

The most recent having been the Louisiana theatre shooing, with two women killed, and another nine wounded.

The shooter was old and with a long life long history of mental illness.

Immediately prior to this was the South Carolina church shooting by a young man with a history of narcotics use and racist web postings. Whether this one is crazy or not, as of yet no history of mental illness has been publicly reported.

So NOT ALL white mass murderers ... .

The premise is a fallacy.
 
55 % OR 14 % OF MURDERS,WILL NEVER REPLACE A "GENOCIDE " OF A PEOPLE. BLACKS IN THE USA,DIDN'T COMMIT THAT ACT OF MURDERS. White people did do that in the USA.
:2wave:

So....are you trying to say that because whites killed a bunch of NA over a century ago it is OK for 55% of the murders in the US caused by black criminals to happen?
 
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

Because White people rule!


Or

Because the two have absolutely nothing to do with one another.

But let me ask you -- If a half Chinese half Mexican who dresses white, speaks an ebonics dialect of Ojibwa, wears a hijab like a do-rag and reeks of curry goes into a gas station and the attendant hides the give a penny take a penny cup when he comes up short a few cents for his Swisher Sweets, pork rinds, and jimmy hats --
Is that attendant a racist?



Who cares?

I sure don't.

:lol:

A hundred years from now you'll look back and laugh.
 
When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings?
Please form a coherent sentence and try again.

It's can't be mental if people of color commit it?
What the actual **** is going on with your poll? Did you forget how to English?
 
Last edited:
Re: When White's commit massacres,why isn't it look at like, Black on black killings

attachment.php
 
Back
Top Bottom