ConsvLiberal
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2015
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 8
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
What do you think?
A little late, don't ya think?
It's a simple matter of equal protection. Men are allowed to marry women, so women should be allowed to marry women. Women are allowed to marry men, so men should be allowed to marry men.
On a moral level, homosexuals have the same duty to their ancestors to marry and raise children as heterosexuals.
Men have a moral obligation to reproduce...or at least adopt?
Yes. Men and women have an obligation to their ancestors to preserve their family lines.
Huh. Why?
If every woman on the planet decided that the would never reproduce again - I'm fine with that. That's their choice. And men don't have that direct choice. It's up to "willing" women, actually.
What if you, as a man, reproduce and don't want to?
It's about time this subject came up.
Only if they give me free bacon strips.
Because we are reborn within our family lines. Our ancestors made room for us, so we must make room for them.
If you're not religious, think about your grandparents and everything they did for your parents and for you so that you could exist in this world-- they would want you to have kids of your own, wouldn't they?
That would lead to the extinction of the species.
Then you either uphold your obligation to your ancestors or you don't. Reproduction should be a choice and parenthood should never be forced on unwilling persons by the State. But there's a matter of right and wrong, and the right thing to do, eventually, is to settle down and raise a family if you are able.
Only one thing smells like bacon, and that's bacon.
Yes. Men and women have an obligation to their ancestors to preserve their family lines.
I cannot vote either because I have no particular lean. With that said...SSM should have been allowed long ago so they could have the same perks heteros have. Long over due. However, with that said, I don't think the SCOTUS should have the right to vote it in to law. It should be each states decision, voted on by people of that state.
What do you think?
It's a simple matter of equal protection. Men are allowed to marry women, so women should be allowed to marry women. Women are allowed to marry men, so men should be allowed to marry men.
On a moral level, homosexuals have the same duty to their ancestors to marry and raise children as heterosexuals.
A little late, don't ya think?