So instead of providing actual empirical evidence to support various religious claims a dodge distraction is made by requiring to support "individuals from antiquity" which have nothing to do with the topic for this thread.
Here, let me break it down to you:
See this is the topic of this thread, on what empirical evidence grounds do the religious have the right to be arrogant bigots? Not who is right or wrong.
But moving on:
On what actual empirical evidence can you assert that your religion is better than the rest? Provide this crucial evidence so as then we can move on to the next issue of: Even if you had the evidence, why be bigoted about it and not rather leave people be?