Try as you might, no matter how divine the religious institution of marriage is, the civil institution is separate from it. This is especially important in a country where religious freedom is one of the highest priorities. After all, Jesus told us to live by example, not to force our Christian values upon others by law.
Bi, Poly, Switch. I'm not indecisive, I'm greedy!
Of course my marriage has changed.
It is now a couple of days more in the rear view mirror than it was previously.
"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos
My life is worse, as is my marriage. The Rangers traded Talbot and are sticking with Lundqvist. I'll likely be a widow this time next year. Other than that, no change. Almost 30 years and going strong.
Horse sense is the thing a horse has which keeps it from betting on people. ~W.C. Fields
I've been married for over 20 years, we're still young (50s) and we've been showered with grandchildren.
It's been 46 years since the Stonewall riot and we're finally at a balance.
You can dance without a lawyer
With the Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893) ruling, the Supreme Court established, as “the law of the land”, that a tomato is not a fruit. Of course, this was a nonsensical ruling. By every accepted biological definition, a tomato is, indeed, a fruit, and the court ruling otherwise would not change this.
Implementing an unalterable falsehood into law does not make it true; it remains every bit as false as before. All that is thus accomplished is to make a mockery of the rule of law itself.
Trying to define, by law, the concept of marriage to include anything other than a specific type of union between a man and a woman is exactly the same sort of mockery of law as ruling that a tomato is not a fruit. A tomato remains what it is, and marriage remains what it is, regardless of any absurd attempt to define it otherwise by law.
The five great lies of the
We can be Godless and free. • “Social justice” through forced redistribution of wealth. • Silencing religious opinions counts as “diversity”. • Freedom without moral and personal responsibility. • Civilization can survive the intentional undermining of the family.