You are not paying attention to what you quoted.
Originally Posted by Peter King
It was believed they were armed.Do you not understand that made them a lethal threat?
The knowledge at the moment is what matters.
What it later turned out to be does not matter to that predication.
The vehicle was used as a weapon.Do you not understand that made the driver a lethal threat and contributed overall to the threat they were.
It is reasonable for anyone who is confronting them to be scared for their life in such circumstances. Even Officers.Nothing you said counters this.
You really should have paid attention to the Judge's ruling.
Originally Posted by Excon
So the only argument you can make is that it is a wrong decision under the law, which I know you can not do.
But please, give it a try.