You stuck your nose in it and in doing so you FAILED to provide the answer to the question that you were so incredulous about me asking.
yes, I commented on your stupid question... which in no ways means the question was posed to me.
I'm far to smart to be taken in by your dishonesty
Who do you think exercises the various rights the Constitution provides for us?
no one.
the Constitution doesn't provide any rights for us.... it provides for protections for rights by limiting what government can and cannot do.
Who do you think is voting in the five different times the Constitution discusses the right to vote?
it doesn't matter.. in every case the right to vote is addressed, it is addressed pertaining to govt behavior/action.
for example, the 15th amendment is pretty clear on voting rights...
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation
no right is granted by this amendment,nor does this apply to the people...this amendments entire purpose is to set forth a boundary for the govt.
at best it can be argued that certain legal rights ( voting, jury trial) are established by providing direct protections for them in the US constitution.... at best.
these protections are ALWAYS in the form of limiting government action... always.
this is a pretty clear example of the Constitution limiting the governments behavior in relation to a right( though voting is not a natural right , at face value)....this is exactly how the document operates throughout it's entirely.
it's is not extreme or even controversial to say our founding document is a document that limits government...it does not limit the people.
the entire document,..every word of it... pertains to government... without fail, without exception.