View Poll Results: Would you support the decision of Texas to peacefully and democratically secede, if voted upon

Voters
134. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    69 51.49%
  • No

    61 45.52%
  • Bumbershoot

    4 2.99%
Page 115 of 131 FirstFirst ... 1565105113114115116117125 ... LastLast
Results 1,141 to 1,150 of 1310

Thread: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

  1. #1141
    Irremovable Intelligence
    Removable Mind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,233

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by prison/con.net View Post
    I'd love to break the US into red and blue states. then the blues would all starve to death without us and good riddance.
    At least somebody finally has the guts to admit such...thanks for sharing what so many who believe as you do won't.

    I posted a POLL that asked who would like to see happen as you've describe...and all of the hardcore Libertarians and/or Hard Right Conservatives just talked around it. Never fessed up.

  2. #1142
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    06-15-17 @ 10:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by Removable Mind View Post
    Natural rights don't exist except where no government exists to intervene.
    sorry law says they do!

  3. #1143
    Irremovable Intelligence
    Removable Mind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,233

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    sorry law says they do!
    Ha, in your dreams.

  4. #1144
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    06-15-17 @ 10:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by Removable Mind View Post
    Ha, in your dreams.
    sorry its fact...

  5. #1145
    Irremovable Intelligence
    Removable Mind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,233

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    sorry its fact...
    I know in your heart you want to really believe it, but it's really not real, it's imaginary. Sorry, but it is.

  6. #1146
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    06-15-17 @ 10:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by Removable Mind View Post
    I know in your heart you want to really believe it, but it's really not real, it's imaginary. Sorry, but it is.
    sorry guy

    organic law of the u.s. which is part of u.s. code, along with the principles of the declaration of independence [one principle being natural law] which is recognized by u.s. federal law.

    what is you rebuttal to this...nothing....you cannot produce anything to make your argument except you own personal words, which is why you fail.

  7. #1147
    Irremovable Intelligence
    Removable Mind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,233

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    sorry guy

    organic law of the u.s. which is part of u.s. code, along with the principles of the declaration of independence [one principle being natural law] which is recognized by u.s. federal law.

    what is you rebuttal to this...nothing....you cannot produce anything to make your argument except you own personal words, which is why you fail.
    that argument was debunked over and over in your DOI thread....

    Principles of the DOI aren't laws.

  8. #1148
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    06-15-17 @ 10:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by Removable Mind View Post
    that argument was debunked over and over in your DOI thread....

    Principles of the DOI aren't laws.
    sorry guy..... the principles are part of u.s. code and they are recognized by federal law.......

    again you have nothing to prove your point..nothing.

  9. #1149
    Irremovable Intelligence
    Removable Mind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,233

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    sorry guy..... the principles are part of u.s. code and they are recognized by federal law.......

    again you have nothing to prove your point..nothing.
    Sorry, I've proved you wrong over and over and over...not going through your circle jerk again.

  10. #1150
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    06-15-17 @ 10:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: Would you support the right of Texas to secede?

    Quote Originally Posted by Removable Mind View Post
    Sorry, I've proved you wrong over and over and over...not going through your circle jerk again.
    wishful thinking on your part.

    but so i can drive the point home, !

    natural law recognized by u.s. federal law.

    AN ACT to provide for the division of Dakota into two States and to enable the people of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Washington to form constitutions and State governments and to be admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States, and to make donations of public lands to such States.

    (Approved February 22, 1889.) [25 U.S. Statutes at Large, c 180 p 676.]

    [President's proclamation declaring Washington a state: 26 St. at Large, Proclamations, p 10, Nov. 11, 1889.]

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the inhabitants of all that part of the area of the United States now constituting the Territories of Dakota, Montana, and Washington, as at present described, may become the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Washington, respectively, as hereinafter provided.


    SEC. 4. That the delegates to the conventions elected as provided for in this act shall meet at the seat of government of each of said Territories, except the delegates elected in South Dakota, who shall meet at the city of Sioux Falls, on the fourth day of July, eighteen hundred and eighty-nine, and, after organization, shall declare, on behalf of the people of said proposed States, that they adopt the Constitution of the United States; whereupon the said conventions shall be, and are hereby, authorized to form constitutions and States governments for said proposed states, respectively. The constitutions shall be republican in form, and make no distinction in civil or political rights on account of race or color, except as to Indians not taxed, and not be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and the principles of the of Declaration of Independence. And said conventions shall provide, by ordinances irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of said States:

    First. That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured and that no inhabitant of said States shall ever be molested in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious worship


    State History Enabling Act

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •