• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The new argument against gay equality: Same-sex marriage kills [W:142]

SSM will cause an increase in abortions


  • Total voters
    26
Holding hands would not be illegal. And you know what openly homosexual means.

Actually, 2 guys holding hands, to me, is openly gay. So I really have no idea what you mean.
 
But since they are specifically saying that gay marriage will cause MORE abortions, that's not helping their claim. There are no accidental, unwanted pregnancies in gay marriages. There are no pregnancies at all for male homosexual relationships and among lesbians, it has go be specifically wanted and planned for. There are zero abortions with regard to adoptions. I'm still wondering where this claim makes any sense at all.

Well I was thinking more of the ones that had their kids when they were in previous straight relationships, as is pretty common. But yeah, obviously they werent aborted.

And no, the claim does not make any sense at all.
 
Some people are desperate to see homosexuals being denied the same rights, privileges and benefits that they get.
 
Just a moron. One born every minute.
 
The state. Punishments would depend on the severity of the crime.

Wow. So you advocate not only sex police, but using the government to prosecute consensual sex.

Wow.
 
People like him must be in absolute agony living in the 21st century.

I get by IRL. Though I would prefer if things were still like they were in the 12th century.

the death penalty for a blowjob?...are you ****ing kidding me?

No. Why would I be kidding?

Actually, 2 guys holding hands, to me, is openly gay. So I really have no idea what you mean.

Holding hands is not a sex act.

Would you outlaw them?

No.

Wow. So you advocate not only sex police, but using the government to prosecute consensual sex.

Wow.

We already use the government to prosecute consensual sexual immorality, why not more?
 
We already use the government to prosecute consensual sexual immorality, why not more?

What consensual sexual immorality do you speak of?
 
Incest, seduction, prostitution, etc.

Is incest prosecuted if both participants are adults?

Seduction is prosecuted? Give examples.

In terms of prostitution, I think you will find many who are willing to allow it - as long as participants are adults.
 
Just another desperate attempt by the usual suspects to try and deny equal rights.
 
Holding hands would not be illegal. And you know what openly homosexual means.

Actually, 2 guys holding hands, to me, is openly gay. So I really have no idea what you mean.


Holding hands is not a sex act.

LOL When do you ever see straight couples or gays committing 'sex acts' in public? (being "openly gay or straight" as you define it)

This is ludicrous but entertaining.
 
I assumed you meant two people who were openly homosexual. If two men are living together, there's nothing suspicious about that. I don't think simple fornication should be punishable by death. It should be punished less severely.

I don't think being a bigot based on religious beliefs should be punishable by death either. It should be punishable less severely.
 
LOL When do you ever see straight couples or gays committing 'sex acts' in public? (being "openly gay or straight" as you define it)

This is ludicrous but entertaining.

Only sex acts would be prosecuted as sex crimes.

So then you support some pretty perverted sex acts. Or it it just that it would be impossible to police?

If an act is not contrary to nature and occurs within marriage I have no problem with it.
 
Only sex acts would be prosecuted as sex crimes.
If an act is not contrary to nature and occurs within marriage I have no problem with it.

Made me think of this
hair.jpg
These Are North Korea’s 28 State-Approved Hairstyles | TIME.com
You can do anything you want as long as its on the list of pre-approved actions. :roll:
 
Only sex acts would be prosecuted as sex crimes.

So then a gay couple living together would not be prosecuted...because, altho you keep saying it...neither straight nor gay couples are out openly committing sex acts in public :doh:
 
It's evil because it promotes evil. Obviously this only applies to the modern pro-gay usage.

You think that being gay is evil as in morally bad, right? Not as in Hitler evil?

Who would you rather have be your leader... a gay person or Hitler?
 
Made me think of this
View attachment 67183496
These Are North Korea’s 28 State-Approved Hairstyles | TIME.com
You can do anything you want as long as its on the list of pre-approved actions. :roll:

What does that have to do with anything?

So then a gay couple living together would not be prosecuted...because, altho you keep saying it...neither straight nor gay couples are out openly committing sex acts in public :doh:

Are you referring to an openly gay couple?

You think that being gay is evil as in morally bad, right? Not as in Hitler evil?

Who would you rather have be your leader... a gay person or Hitler?

What are the gay person's positions?
 
What are the gay person's positions?

Gay Gandhi... promotes peace, balance, equality, self-sufficiency and democratic rights, among other things.

Hitler wants you dead...

Choose one...
 
Gay Gandhi... promotes peace, balance, equality, self-sufficiency and democratic rights, among other things.

Hitler wants you dead...

Choose one...

They both sound terrible, both as men and as politicians. But if it came to it, I suppose I would take democracy over Nazism, even though they're both pernicious.
 
Last edited:
So are you married? If so were you a virgin?



I'm not married. I've never had sex.

WTF????You consider rape and seduction one and the same??????????

14 and younger. Good grief. That is about a child predator.

Why bring children into this??

Seduction historically referred to what is now called statutory rape. It is still prosecuted even if it's consensual.
 
Back
Top Bottom