• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will you vote for Hillary as our next President? [W:302]

Will you vote for Hillary as our next President


  • Total voters
    126
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

It's bogus. The fact that George Soros finances to the tune of several million dollars destroys it's credibility right off the bat.

In other words, you can't prove it, so you're just resorting to weak ad hominem.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

In other words, you can't prove it, so you're just resorting to weak ad hominem.

You are the one who came up with a George Soros funded anti voter ID bill web site to support your claim that minorities and the elderly are disenfranchised by voter ID bills. The voter disenfranchisement fantasy is being pushed by democrats. Asking me to disprove what you have failed to prove is a bit silly. The site that you posted basically pulled the 11% figure out of it's backside. Considering that a valid photo ID is required for so much in regards to day to day living, one would have to live in fantasyland to buy into the 11% figure. The actual figure is likely less then one tenth of one percent.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

You are the one who came up with a George Soros funded anti voter ID bill web site to support your claim that minorities and the elderly are disenfranchised by voter ID bills. The voter disenfranchisement fantasy is being pushed by democrats. Asking me to disprove what you have failed to prove is a bit silly. The site that you posted basically pulled the 11% figure out of it's backside. Considering that a valid photo ID is required for so much in regards to day to day living, one would have to live in fantasyland to buy into the 11% figure. The actual figure is likely less then one tenth of one percent.

Prove it.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

Prove it.

Once again, it is those of you on the left who are making the disenfranchisement claim. You must prove that before you can ask me to prove anything. You can start by not posting a source (Brennan) that used goofy opinion poll extrapolation data to come up with it's fantasy claim of 11%.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

It's bogus. The fact that George Soros finances to the tune of several million dollars destroys it's credibility right off the bat.
That X person or organization provides funding for Z thing does not prove anything about Z.

It only indicates whether Z is something X supports.

That said, the X can bring into question the position of Z about some things, depending on X's position about the same things.


Basically what I'm saying here is that X funds Z =/= X agrees with Z, and certainly does not mean that if X funds Z, Z is dead politically.


That's not an argument, it's conviction by association. You can only cast aspersions by association and still have a leg to stand on, logically.

Proving those aspersions requires more information.

But aspersions are often plenty to cause issues, in politics.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

Once again, it is those of you on the left who are making the disenfranchisement claim. You must prove that before you can ask me to prove anything. You can start by not posting a source (Brennan) that used goofy opinion poll extrapolation data to come up with it's fantasy claim of 11%.

I accept your concession.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

Once again, it is those of you on the left who are making the disenfranchisement claim. You must prove that before you can ask me to prove anything. You can start by not posting a source (Brennan) that used goofy opinion poll extrapolation data to come up with it's fantasy claim of 11%.
I'm not sure of the exact legalities, but it seems to me that any kind of voter ID requirement law must also provide for completely free voter ID.

There are 2 amendments out there that make it unconstitutional to impose a poll tax (for federal elections in 1964, and all elections in 1966), and it would seem that requiring payment to obtain ID that is required to vote would qualify.

In spirit, at the least. Possibly in letter. Of the law, I mean.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

That X person or organization provides funding for Z thing does not prove anything about Z.

It only indicates whether Z is something X supports.

That said, the X can bring into question the position of Z about some things, depending on X's position about the same things.


Basically what I'm saying here is that X funds Z =/= X agrees with Z, and certainly does not mean that if X funds Z, Z is dead politically.


That's not an argument, it's conviction by association. You can only cast aspersions by association and still have a leg to stand on, logically.

Proving those aspersions requires more information.

But aspersions are often plenty to cause issues, in politics.

You can spin it anyway you like. There is no doubt whatsoever that the Brennan Law Center is anti-Voter ID and cherry picks data in it's so-called studies...if you want to call them studies. They are biased as hell. Then add on the fact that Soros donates millions......I cannot take them seriously.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

I accept your concession.

No concession from me, Kobie. It is you that has something to prove.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

I'm not sure of the exact legalities, but it seems to me that any kind of voter ID requirement law must also provide for completely free voter ID.

There are 2 amendments out there that make it unconstitutional to impose a poll tax (for federal elections in 1964, and all elections in 1966), and it would seem that requiring payment to obtain ID that is required to vote would qualify.

In spirit, at the least. Possibly in letter. Of the law, I mean.

You certainly are not sure of the legalities and "seems to me" does not count.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

Only if I can use 5.56, 7.62, or .44 sized voting chits.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

You can spin it anyway you like. There is no doubt whatsoever that the Brennan Law Center is anti-Voter ID and cherry picks data in it's so-called studies...if you want to call them studies. They are biased as hell. Then add on the fact that Soros donates millions......I cannot take them seriously.
I actually have no idea what or who is involved in whatever you speak of.

I was speaking in more general terms.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

You certainly are not sure of the legalities and "seems to me" does not count.
It's an opinion.

It counts just as much as the opinion you just posted.
 
Re: Will you vote for Hillary as ourr next President?

I actually have no idea what or who is involved in whatever you speak of.

I was speaking in more general terms.

Noted.
 
Back
Top Bottom