View Poll Results: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes.

    4 9.76%
  • No.

    31 75.61%
  • Maybe.

    6 14.63%
Page 7 of 16 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 153

Thread: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

  1. #61
    Sage
    Somerville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    On an island. Not that one!
    Last Seen
    05-23-17 @ 02:14 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    8,947

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    I did......I said Kissinger and Schultz. Did you miss the post where I said their names? There is a couple of them in here.
    Post #51 has no names and no link to your sourced quotes.
    “And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
    ~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822

  2. #62
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    9,482

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    You must not have read all of what the experts are saying. Whats Iran going to do.....declare war on the US? Puleeeze don't make me laugh this early in the morning.
    You are underestimating the great Iranian fleet. Why, against all those PT boats our huge carriers and cruisers and submarines wouldn't stand a chance. Those boats could roar across the Atlantic and Pacific--refueling a few times en route, of course--and blockade both our coasts! And don't forget the Iranian army. They could load them into old freighters and tankers and bring them here to land on our unprotected coasts, and we'd be helpless to stop them. They'd be really angry, and they'd have rifles, too!

  3. #63
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by kjwins View Post
    Here's one that tells the truth of the deal.



    Here is what Netanyahu said in front of Congress.....not to mention. The Saud has already stated that they will have their Nuke. If Iran gets their.




    He told the joint session that the emerging deal would allow Iran to retain too much of its existing nuclear infrastructure. And he warned that US and other Western powers are proposing to allow Iran to develop too many nuclear centrifuges, a key component to one day fielding an atomic weapon.

    "If anyone thinks this deal kicks the can down the road, think again.

    "The alternative to this deal," Netanyahu said, his voice booming as he pounded the podium with his left hand, "is a much better deal. "A better deal that doesn't leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and short breakout times," Netanyahu said. "A better deal that doesn't give Iran an easy path to the bomb.....snip~

    Netanyahu: Iran Deal Could Lead to War

  4. #64
    Educator GreatNews2night's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Seen
    04-07-17 @ 12:26 AM
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    699

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    The answer *must* be "maybe" even for those (like me) who really, really, really don't want to see this happen. The need for a "maybe" is two fold - one, having the possibility on the table does help keeping the Iranians a bit better behaved, and two, in the very, very, very unlikely possibility that the Iranian regime will end up actually building a bomb and actually using it (again, I find this to be extremely unlikely because I don't see these ayatollahs as being plain suicidal), then yes, not only the US but other Western powers would have to attack them back.

    I see the Iranians in a quest for regional influence and a lot of their tough posturing is for internal politics. I don't see them *really* set on nuking Israel or other Western interests. Yes, maybe they'll build a bomb, but probably won't use it. It would be a dangerous development for the Middle East (and also, one might worry about regime change in the future with some rogue group getting hold of this arsenal), but I don't think the current regime would translate into action their tough rhetoric. Still, one never knows what the future might hold.

    So, I'm quite surprised with so many "no" and so few "maybe" answers, because one can not entirely discount the possibility of future conflict. Nothing is certain in the world, today. So, a straight "no" without leaving at least a very small possibility of action in case of real catastrophic escalation from the Iranians, seems to me to be a bit naive.
    Last edited by GreatNews2night; 04-11-15 at 12:16 PM.

  5. #65
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Somerville View Post
    Post #51 has no names and no link to your sourced quotes.
    That's due to it being from the same link I already posted. Of course reading the link one would know this.

  6. #66
    I'm colorblind. Are you?
    Lovebug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    4,171

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by sawdust View Post
    Nonsense, Obama has started drone wars all over the globe. He takes no prisoners and kills lots of civilians because drones are indiscriminate. He does this because the only place he can put prisoners is Gitmo, which he's trying to empty.
    While we are at it, don't forget enabling the GITMO prisoners by setting them free. Nice to kick the can down the road and inevitably making the next guy look bad.

  7. #67
    Sage
    Born Free's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Sonny and Nice
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:09 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    6,115

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus View Post
    And that deal would include what? Free and immediate inspections anytime anywhere, sanctions lifted over time, a stop to enriching, and closing their underground nuclear facility.
    Liberals - Punish the Successful, Reward the Unsuccessful
    Liberals - Tax, Borrow, Spend, and Give Free Stuff
    Obama's legacy - President Donald Trump

  8. #68
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Born Free View Post
    And that deal would include what? Free and immediate inspections anytime anywhere, sanctions lifted over time, a stop to enriching, and closing their underground nuclear facility.
    Mornin BF. A theory that looks good on paper.

  9. #69
    Professor
    kjwins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:04 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,835

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Here is what Netanyahu said in front of Congress.....not to mention. The Saud has already stated that they will have their Nuke. If Iran gets their.




    He told the joint session that the emerging deal would allow Iran to retain too much of its existing nuclear infrastructure. And he warned that US and other Western powers are proposing to allow Iran to develop too many nuclear centrifuges, a key component to one day fielding an atomic weapon.

    "If anyone thinks this deal kicks the can down the road, think again.

    "The alternative to this deal," Netanyahu said, his voice booming as he pounded the podium with his left hand, "is a much better deal. "A better deal that doesn't leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and short breakout times," Netanyahu said. "A better deal that doesn't give Iran an easy path to the bomb.....snip~

    Netanyahu: Iran Deal Could Lead to War
    This whole thing is about money & power.

    Republicans want to make Obama look bad. Also they want to keep US arms dealers to selling to Saudi Arabia & wealth countries in the ME.

    Saudi Arabia & Israel want to be the main powers in the ME. They want to keep the sanctions on Iran or have them fighting a War. The Israeli military police has said that Iran is not making Nukes.

  10. #70
    Left the building
    Fearandloathing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,957

    Re: Should the US launch a military strike on Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by matchlight View Post
    I have done lots of research, and I have never relied on the internet for most of it--or on articles by left-wing propagandists who are always trying to defame this country.

    OK, an independent observer who has followed the debate in Canada's House of Commons about civilian casualties stemming from the war on terror especially Afghanistan, I have to make a value judgment of what you offer and what is offered in contrast.

    What is offered in contrast is journalism, edited and fact checked in the journalistic traditions I practiced for 25 years plus. The Washington Post is a noted right leaning newspaper and is quoting two well known international civil rights organizations who have added their name to Doctors Without Borders in saying the US is less than honest in reporting the number of civilian casualties.

    You offer a blog. A blog by a savagely right wing military geek with charts and graphs and nice colors, but doesn't appear to directly address the topic you are defending, that the US is really very efficient in killing.

    What I do recall from the Commons debate, where our politicians lose their job if caught in a lie, is that in one drone attack, there were 19 attempts and they never did get the guy. Left unsaid was that each of those 19 attacks claimed lives of some kind and probably human.

    We are dealing with a nation that has been waging war on terror for 14 years...and is losing. We began with one war, then two, now there are seven fronts and no sign of ever, ever leveling off let alone ending, a nation that had the criminal mastermind in its sights, but took ten years to assassinate him. A nation's whose intelligence community completely missed the fall of the Berlin Wall, the 911 attacks, misread Arab Spring as friendly and claimed the assassination of a sitting diplomat and three marines was a "spontaneous demonstration" Yes I know that was Obama, but he is your commander in chief and represents the entire US military.

    So, with that, you offer as dispute that there aren't too many civilians being slaughtered, an internet blog that doesn't appear to deal with civilian casualties, but reads like a boyscout endorsement of US war policy.

    It is a matter of who is believable and it has been my experience in lifetime of research that NGO's like Doctor's Without Borders are far and away, no ****ing light years more believable the United States Pentagon and the Military Industrial Complex that it supports.

    I would say you are guilty of what you deny...you only read that which supports your opinion and it doesn't seem to matter what is the source material.
    "Small people talk about people, average people talk about events, great people talk about ideas" Eleanor Roosevelt

Page 7 of 16 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •