Irrelevant to the point made.
They are worth what they are worth.
If that be a dime a week that is all they are worth.
Irrelevant to what their labor is worth
in their market.
You clearly do not understand that.
Again, as you were already told;
You judge that by the local prevailing rate, just as you judge the conditions by the local requirements.
If it is only worth 0.50¢ a week, that is all it is worth.
:naughty
No, their economy determines that.
And in some cases these capitalists pay above the prevailing wage.
So you are again speaking nonsense.
Just more emotive nonsense from you confirming you have no valid argument.
Yes wrong.
Heck you can't even properly quote what you are replying to, so of course you are just more wrong in that regard as well.
Irrelevant emotive nonsense.
There is nothing wrong with a company seeking lower costs in production. Nothing.
It is important in debate.
The problem is in your not understanding what was said.
Again, as you were already told;
You judge that by the local prevailing rate, just as you judge the conditions by the local requirements.
If it is only worth 0.50¢ a week, that is all it is worth.
Another lame argument.
They are not making such a product.
Nor is that product worth that much in the market it is made.
What ever you are speaking to you are obviously wrong as usual.
That is right, and they are not on your side.
And your emotive illogical nonsense are not facts that matter.
Wrong.
You seem to like making assertions of things not said.
Btw construction workers are laborers. Not much skilled required.
Wrong.
You are speaking to an overpopulation issue. Not capitalism.
:doh
Wrong. I keep telling you that you are wrong because you are.
Which has only to do with your inferior arguments.
Wrong again.