Liberals - Punish the Successful, Reward the Unsuccessful
Liberals - Tax, Borrow, Spend, and Give Free Stuff
Obama's legacy - Total Failure
This is you not understanding what has been said.
Again;You judge that by the local prevailing rate, just as you judge the conditions by the local requirements.
If it is only worth 0.50¢ a week, that is all it is worth.
What is it you do not understand about that?
Do you really not understand that?
Do I really need to change the amount for you to understand what is being said?
You are wrong.
Paying them what they are worth is not exploitation.
Feeding them with other's resources just exacerbates the problem.
Another emotive and lame reply.
You are not entitled to another's efforts. Not in reality or nature.
Get rid of that silly notion.
Your reply is illogical as it is ignorant.
That is what you are engaged in.
There is no obvious MLK point. You were being emotive as well as illogical.
2. They can't show any such thing. The claim is "too much". That is a subjective assertion, and as such, can not be proven.
Every citizen has a right to lobby or have another lobby on their behalf. Sorry you do not like that, but there is nothing wrong with lobbying.
The wealthy support those who are of similar views as theirs own.
Just as the poor support those who are of similar views as theirs own.
If a person isn't a viable candidate for the masses they are appealing to, they are not going to be elected no matter how much money is thrown into the coffers by the wealthy.
“The law is reason, free from passion.”
❈ Aristotle ❈
We produce enough feed, right now, to feed 10 billion people, you're claim is ludicrous.
Not wrong, it's why capitalists love countries without minimum wage laws, labor laws.. and it's why they actively fight against labor laws/wage laws, has they have through history, with slavery, child labor, the minimum wage.. You appear to literally have no emotion, which is important when talking about the starvation of others. The problem is, it is not 50 cents a week, where the hell are you getting that anyway? You honestly think a sweatshop worker making $100 in product an hour that gets paid 10 cents an hour is just how much she/he is worth? I don't care what you say, any human being with a conscious knows that it is not right. Ah, the nature of the capitalist. You keep saying illogical and ignorant, while refusing to say why other then LUL EMOTIONAL. Facts are facts, genius, and emotion isn't a bad thing when constituted with facts. You are defining it on your own, you seem to think staring at excel sheets and working the stock market is more skilled then a construction worker, you are coming up with your own definitions. Capitalism doesn't help poverty, it's been fueling it, feeding off of it, just look at why capitalists move production to countries with little to no labor laws, and yes, I do take into account the local prices, which is why the people suffer from bad nutrition, laughable shelter, never guaranteed food, let alone meat, which is a rarity, hell, affording a good education, decent clothing, clean water, medicine? Good luck, without help from generous people, which we need more of. Look at the congo, burundi, liberia, niger, Nicaragua, Haiti.. You keep saying wrong like you're superior, while defining stuff on your own and ignoring poverty reports, etc.. Wait, we shouldn't feed them at all? Jesus ****ing christ. (Capitalism may help first world countries in some aspects, but to maintain this, it relies on labor in third world countries, and countries with little to no labor laws/unions/etc..)
Last edited by Dovkan; 04-09-15 at 08:28 PM.