Because they declare they are God's Chosen People, which is offensive
Because they do not integrating society making themselves an outsider minority
Because of religious reasons, ie "Christ killers" and ancient conflicts with Muslims
Because for whatever reason they tend to become wealthier than most people
Because they tend to favor each other in dealings unfairly
Because they collectively conspire to gain influence where ever they are
Their rituals and self-collectivism invokes xenophobia
Because Jews oppress people when they gain influence
Because Jews tended to surrender or flee rather than fight so are easy targets of hate
The poll is false. Historically Jews have not suffered atrocities more than others
The TINY area Jews had was - as the British pulled out - attacked by the armies of 6 Islamic countries, Palestinians, and volunteers from numerous other countries - attacking with heavy armor. It was Palestinians and the professional armies of half a dozen countries plus more attacking who they believed were helpless Jews. The Egyptian general declared the Jews were entirely defenseless would be immediately totally overrun and exterminated.
The Jews prevailed anyway.
Nor was this the last mass military attack by Palestinians along with the professional armies of Muslim countries.
Read history. Before any fighting and from the start, the Jews only wanted a tiny piece of land smaller than now - and said that everywhere else - 99.99+% of the region and essentially all natural resources could be "exclusively Arab."
Instead the Palestinians rioted, demanded Jews do not have 1 inch and that the Jews all be runoff or killed. Then went to war against the Jews. Then again. Then again.
Have you ever heard the expression: "YOU MADE YOUR OWN BED. NOW LIE IN IT." That is the situation of Palestinians.
THEY created the situation they are in - and they keep themselves in it.
Gaza is a prison camp, says David Cameron
David Cameron has described Gaza as a ''prison camp'' and appealed to the Israeli Government to allow the free flow of humanitarian goods and people in and out of the Palestinian territory.
Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy
Constantine? All of history changed because he had a bizarre dream.
Einstein is who both warned FDR that German was pursuing something called the atomic bomb and told FDR such could be built. For this, operations were undertaken successfully against Germany's heavywater production (for which Germany's one attempt to detonate an atomic bomb failed) and the USA undertook the massive atomic bomb program.
Yet Einstein was a militant pacifist. What changed his mind? His sister was murdered in a concentration camp.
Or the windows opened in Hitler's bunker and the one-armed bomb carrier able to arm only one of the two suitcase bombs? Had he succeeded, the Germany army on the Atlantic wall was going to roll on Berlin to take out the SS and surrender to the USA, while turning all German forces singularly to stop Russia's advance. That failure lead to the rise of the USSR and oppression of all of Eastern Europe.
BUT for Hitler's genocide of Jews he would have had atomic bombs for the tips of his V2 missiles - which would have forced both the UK and Russia to surrender and made such as the Normandy landing impossible. That tiny detail that virtually no one knows or mentions, that footnote, is one a fact if it didn't exist Germany would have won the war and dominated the world as the only atomic weapons power and only nation with ballistic missiles to put them on - easily launched on the USA from submarines if need be.
As for the never ending conflict between Muslims and Christians? Muhammed FIRST approached the Christian and Jewish leadership declaring that Arabs too have the SAME God and therefore claimed they ALL were the same religion. The response of those leaders was to try to hunt down Muhammed to kill him and his followers. Had they accepted? Imagine the endless wars to this day that would never of happened.
The tornado that hit Washington DC in the war of 1812. The gale that took out the Spanish Armada. The heavy rain just before the battle between the Christians of Paris and the Muslim army so softening the ground the Muslim horses couldn't travel on it.
In the War of 1812 the British had won. Conquered DC. Setting the city on fire. And a tornado hits their army and then a drenching rainstorm putting out the fires? What the hell are the odds of both those happening at that exact moment and place? Yet such as that possibly defines world history more than all the grand plans of the most brilliant planners.
Little historic details and quirks of reality.
And there there is the original Sunni-Shia split. If only Muhammed had left a will saying who assumed his role?
Despite all the grand schemes, history is mostly written by inadvertent and seemingly small details, oversights and entirely unpredictable events.
Curiously, that is one abstract strong suggestion there is a God or some unknown Karma powers involved in world and human events.
Last edited by joko104; 04-03-15 at 02:41 PM.
Why don't Palestinians leave that "prison camp?" We know one Palestinian who did - 3 decades ago. Came to America. Ended up bringing all his family and their family here too over the years. And believes Americans are nuts for not appreciating all we have including free enterprise. It's not a prison camp if you decide to stay and instead throw rocks.
Why doesn't David Cameron pursue allowing Palestinians immigrating to the UK if he REALLY gives a damn? Why don't the Muslim countries in that region do so if they REALLY cared about Palestinians. He does not hate Jews. He sees Palestinians as stupid.
The LAST Western country Israel should trust is the UK if you know the history of Israel's independence. The Jews were attacked by Palestinians, the armies of SIX Muslim countries and volunteers from other Muslim countries - having heavy BRITISH armor - while Britain tried to blockaide military equipment to the Jews. The British also did a double take on behalf of Palestinians to deny the Jews ANY land whatsoever. Prior to this, when the Nazi Himmler tried to make a deal to turn the Jews over to the UK, the UK's response was they didn't want them and wouldn't accept them.
The UK is NOT Israel's friend. The UK leadership historically is just fine with Jews being killed and Israel obliterated. This list of countries the UK screwed up is LONG. Israel and Palestine are on that long list.
Last edited by joko104; 04-03-15 at 03:49 PM.
Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." --First Amendment to the United States Constitution
I do understand you prefer the genocidal tactics of Muslims against Jews than the control Jews exercise over Palestinians. So why don't you post that - that the Jews should kill and imprison all Palestinians who won't leave? That's the system of those you praise and endorse.
The neocon lacky is you, but you are too easily fooled and used to realize this. The more Iran is armed to militarize the region in rebellions and chaos, the more reason there will be to have military response. For the USA and West to have justification to go to war there has to be another side to fight. Pouring money into Iran is the ideal way to accomplish this goal. But they understand people like you are too simplistic and easily sold on slogans to realize this.
It is because of people like you that the wars and terrorism will go on. Adversaries are defeated by starving them on, not by pouring money on them.
They got everyone thinking this is only about nuclear weapons because people are easily fooled.
Last edited by joko104; 04-03-15 at 04:13 PM.