View Poll Results: Should ALL laws sunset after 10 years?

32. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes, laws need to be constantly reviewed

    14 43.75%
  • no, laws should be forever until replaced

    9 28.13%
  • Other - explain in thread

    8 25.00%
  • Welcome To Costco I Love You

    1 3.13%
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 82 of 82

Thread: Should ALL laws sunset after 10 years?

  1. #81
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:30 PM
    Libertarian - Right

    Re: Should ALL laws sunset after 10 years?

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrates View Post
    Yes, one of the laws that definitely needs to be replaced is the gun law
    true, the federal government has no proper power in this area
    Quote Originally Posted by EarlzP View Post
    Why would you not want to register your weapon?
    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrity View Post
    , as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

  2. #82
    Phonetic Mnemonic
    radcen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Look to your left... I'm that guy.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:26 PM

    Re: Should ALL laws sunset after 10 years?

    Quote Originally Posted by eohrnberger View Post
    If the individual laws are being reviewed for their efficacy, then really, what's the point?
    Yep. This also touches on vaguely written laws and how they come back to bite us. A law can be written as, "All laws must sunset after 10 years, and must be renewed to continue." No mention of *how*, and as you say, they could all be renewed with one fell swoop.

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    I don't think anyone can argue that FDR was trying to follow the constitution. He wanted to use the crisis of the Depression to grab all sorts of powers for the federal government that cannot be found by even the most expansive honest interpretation of the commerce clause etc
    I don't believe he was outright violating the Constitution... if only because he knew he'd never get away with it... but he was clearly trying to do an end run, while staying juuuuuuust inside the boundaries, and having the same end result as violating the Constitution.
    If, when defending your support for Donald Trump, and your response is,
    "But but but... HILLARY!!!", then you lost the argument before you even began.

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts