Brain Starts to Deteriorate From Age 45: Study
Enough said.Researchers gave a number of cognitive tests to 5,198 men and 2,192 women ages 45 to 70 three times over the course of 10 years. The study participants were assessed on memory, reasoning, vocabulary and aural and visual comprehension.
Declines were seen in all areas except for vocabulary, and as people got older there was a faster drop. Over the 10 years, men ages 45 to 49 saw a 3.6% decline in mental reasoning. Those 65 to 70 saw a 9.6% drop. In women the declines were 3.6% for those 45 to 49 and 7.4% for those 65 to 70
Brain Starts to Deteriorate From Age 45: Study, Mental Health | ePharmaPedia
80 is the limit...and even then, every year they must pass a 'sound mind' test...no matter how young they are.
Same should go for the POTUS and the VPOTUS, btw.
Over 320 million people in America, there is no need for people in these extremely important positions hanging on until death when there are plenty of very well qualified people to replace them.
'What kind of sick and twisted toy factory is this?'
'We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much, the best of us is washed away.'
"Better to be dead and cool, than alive and uncool."
I think one of the greatest things about the Supreme Court is that they aren't subject to political influence because of their lifetime appointment. If Justice Roberts votes to keep Obamacare there are no consequences, he doesn't have to worry about what he will do once he leaves the Court.
I also think that limiting the term of the Supremes would lead to flip-flopping as the balance of power shifted continually. With the current system, Justices tend to retire once the party they favor is in office, so that their replacement tends to have similar political views. If you force them to retire after say 12 or 16 years then some Justices nominated by Republicans would end up replaced by Democrats, or vice-versa. For example, if Hillary Clinton wins two terms as President that would mean the entire court would be nominated by Democrats. Then if the Republicans win a few terms the Court would shift, and likely overturn many of the previous rulings.
So this is a very bad idea.
Schadenfreude ist die schönste Freude.
I like have a technocratic elite that is insulated (as much as possible) from the machinations of politics. If anything I think the Supreme Court and the judiciary has become to accessible and too willing to discuss their views. I'd like to restrict the ability of judges to give speeches, hold talks, and other events to the public while in office though I'm not sure if there is a way to do that and have it pass Constitutional muster.
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius