- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 29,957
- Reaction score
- 14,682
- Location
- Netherlands
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
It seems that in California you need to be of "good moral character", but the LGBT community wonders whether someone qualifies for this if he has proposed a statewide ballet that would allow gays and lesbians to be "put to death by bullets to the head".
Or as this idiot (and I am using it here instead of other words that IMHO suit this moron even better but that would be banned from use on this or most other message boards/forums) put it:
But the moron goes on, he does not think putting gays and lesbians to death for even something as sexually promiscuous as a kiss, he also wants to target the people "who propagandize that abomination":
And then he goes on that the federal government should not be allowed to ban such a law, he goes on that if the government does not enforce this law and remains inactive for a year, that the general public is allowed to kill these sodomites themselves without any fear of consequences. You know, a good old gay and lesbian killing fest without any fear of being arrested or imprisoned.
You can read his entire moronic law here: stupidest lawyer ever proposes legalizing hate crimes.
You can read more about this disgraceful excuse for a human being and a person who clearly does not belief in the United States or anything it stands for (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and a whole host of US laws/civil rights) here:
Matthew Gregory McLaughlin, California Lawyer, Proposes Ballot Measure Allowing Execution of Gays - NBC News
A lawyer in California is pushing a ballot measure to legalize killing gay people - Vox
So please discuss, should someone like that be allowed to practice law in California or has he well and truly gone beyond being of "good moral character"?
Or as this idiot (and I am using it here instead of other words that IMHO suit this moron even better but that would be banned from use on this or most other message boards/forums) put it:
Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than they all of us should be killed by God's wroth against us for the folly of tolerating wickedness in our midst, the people of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to head or by any other convenient method.
But the moron goes on, he does not think putting gays and lesbians to death for even something as sexually promiscuous as a kiss, he also wants to target the people "who propagandize that abomination":
No person shall distribute, perform or transmit sodomistic propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the age of majority. Sodomistic propaganda is defined as anything aimed at creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other than between a man and a woman. Every offender shall be fined $1 million per occurence, and/or imprisoned up to 10 years, and/or expelled from the boundaries of the state of California for up to life.
And then he goes on that the federal government should not be allowed to ban such a law, he goes on that if the government does not enforce this law and remains inactive for a year, that the general public is allowed to kill these sodomites themselves without any fear of consequences. You know, a good old gay and lesbian killing fest without any fear of being arrested or imprisoned.
You can read his entire moronic law here: stupidest lawyer ever proposes legalizing hate crimes.
You can read more about this disgraceful excuse for a human being and a person who clearly does not belief in the United States or anything it stands for (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and a whole host of US laws/civil rights) here:
Matthew Gregory McLaughlin, California Lawyer, Proposes Ballot Measure Allowing Execution of Gays - NBC News
A lawyer in California is pushing a ballot measure to legalize killing gay people - Vox
So please discuss, should someone like that be allowed to practice law in California or has he well and truly gone beyond being of "good moral character"?