Actually I think some conspiracy theorist are good. Especially when the government knows what is best for the people more than the people. I think some of the conspiracies are asinine. But to a certain extent they are also healthy. As long as the government keeps things hidden from the people, keeps thing secret and classified, we need some good conspiracy theories if nothing else but to keep the government on its toes.
Early voting in Georgia. On the 20th of October this old Goldwater conservative voted against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton by casting my vote for Gary Johnson. Neither Trump or Clinton belong within a million miles of the Oval Office.
- a self defeating strategy and
- a strategy which is not acceptable in an open society
- a strategy which an open society renders relatively moot
but in doing so he was not actually trying to point out that censorship was a bad idea?
The author then goes on to recommend some other methods as likely to be more effective.
These things when all taken together indicate that the author intends to implement censorship of CT dissemination should end up in high office?
what does crippled epistemology mean anyway?
I may be wrong.
We suggest a role for government efforts, and agents, in introducing such diversity. Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.
I may be wrong.