- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 102,483
- Reaction score
- 45,758
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yes it would be a good thing. But then we end up with Uncle Joe.
Would ending up with Uncle Joe be a bad thing?
Yes it would be a good thing. But then we end up with Uncle Joe.
She would represent the constituency who elected her just as good as say
Sheila Jackson Lee represents her constituency.
If she Bashes the President, perhaps that too is representative of her constituency.
Her job if she was elected as a Representative would be to represent the views of the people who elected her.What would she do about immigration, jobs, healthcare?
I'd love to have her run for McCain's seat. It would be worth it just to see the AZGOP soil themselves trying to get rid of her.
I will vote yes when your poll appears, but only because I don't think Ginsburg is ever going to keel over so we can put Sarah on the bench.
Sarah Palin needs to stick to her current job, spreading BS.
It's the one that fits her talents. :roll:
I wonder if either of you would apply your same standards to President Obama...you know, the man who quit two (2) government service positions.
I'll admit that, for a lot of people, Obama quitting one more job would be considered a good thing.
The media is on Obama's **** and propped him up to win the presidency. The media is so much on Obama's **** that Obama could be on video smacking the **** out women and saying "the only thing women are good for is cooking and sucking dick" and the media would pretend the video doesn't exist, mock those who show the video and find a way to spin the video in Obama's favor.
Obama quits and Biden takes his place.I do not think that would be any better.
Sarah Palin doesn't belong on the bench, she doesn't have the background. :roll:
Neither does that lesbian chick, but hey, whatcha gonna do. There is no requirement that a Justice even be educated in law. We could put anybody up there we wanted, which is why we should have a rotating seat that the citizens get to elect for a 1 year term based on their performance in a competition reality show called "Justice Got Talent."
Well, whining about the media is all fine and dandy, but I asked about you.
I might not like her, but at least she has a Harvard law degree. Not that that has helped our CiC follow the Constitution any better.
Good point, it has only been a few years in most states where law school was required to take the bar.John Marshall, William Rehnquist, and Earl Warren weren't judges first and a great many of our early justices were people who read the law as opposed having gone to law school back before the rent-seekers took over the profession.
I do not vote for libs.
Her job if she was elected as a Representative would be to represent the views of the people who elected her.
We hope her position on such subjects would reflect those of her constituency, no more, no less.
Obama's situation is not the same as Palin's.Perhaps you need to track back a bit because I didn't ask you how you voted.
What do you find interesting about that?
This is a public poll that does not require declaring an ideological loyalty. Do you think Sarah Palin would be a good member of Congress?
Obama's situation is not the same as Palin's.
1.Like I said before the media has their lips firmly wrapped around Obama's ****. Obama could be on video smashing a kitten's head with a brick, kicking a baby, saying some racist or sexist ****, or some other vile **** and the media would pretend the video doesn't exist,label anyone making a big deal out of it as racist and try to spin it in Obama's favor.
2.Elected officials do quit one office into to move into another office.THey just do not quit.
It doesn't matter what theory you want to believe in why she quit. The fact she quit her term as governor made her a quitter.Someone who can not be trusted to complete her term in office.
I wonder if either of you would apply your same standards to President Obama...you know, the man who quit two (2) government service positions.
John Marshall, William Rehnquist, and Earl Warren weren't judges first and a great many of our early justices were people who read the law as opposed having gone to law school back before the rent-seekers took over the profession.