Did the Christian leaders and heretics end up being tried and condemned?
Put in Newspapers, taken into courts. Court Law and before Kings, and or some other Royal title.
All of it has relevance to what you said. But due to it not just following what you said. But due to some realities that you forgot with all that you were saying......Do their Clerics make the journey to Mecca? From whatever country?????
Is that not how they spread the Word for those that are illiterate. Has not the Taliban showed for generations on what knowledge is passed and how? How about those Indonesian Clerics that are Muslim?
Also did you forget the Arab spring? Did you forget how their Clerics used Social media to get in touch with each other in different countries. Imagine that!
What happened? How many decades do we have to be told.....how many have been taught by word of mouth from those regions of the world that lack in education. Which says nothing of those who are Highly informed and knows exactly what is going. Like the King of the Saud and Sunni!
Interesting. You seem to be under the impression that the Arab Spring -
which was a contained urban event - can be extrapolated to some sort of pan-Islamic movement to deal with terrorism. However, the reality is that the Arab Spring had its own set of constraints which didn't really have much to do with Islam or for that matter religion.
The
Arab Spring (emphasis on Arab as opposed to
Muslim Spring) spread in
urban environments. It was a call for regime change that was worlds away from where most Muslims live and more importantly, had little to do with Islam itself. As such, there wasn't
really an Arab Spring. There was an Egyptian Spring, an Tunisian Spring, etc. With that said, they were individual revolutions which were spread in urban centers and had little impact on the rest of the Muslim world.
Secondly, the people it did spread to did not join it based on an idea of solidarity with people of
other countries against oppressive regimes, but the belief that they needed to address the situations in their
own countries. It was a societal event restricted to mostly urban people in a small group of countries which shared similar regimes and situations. However, even in the supposed magnitude you claim it had, it failed to even register in countries like Pakistan (158 million) or Singapore (249 million), India (177 million), Bangladesh (144 million) where over 60% of all Muslims live. Hell, I could go down the list of Muslim countries and you'd find that the "Arab Spring" really had nothing to do with the Muslim world and even in countries with equally oppressive regimes, it failed to pick up any steam.
With all of that said, you really seem to not be able to understand that this is a world where there a hundreds of millions of people. Most of whom are concerned with personal situations like earning money, buying food, taking their kids to school etc. If the majority of Christians don't take time out of their day to tell us that they oppose things we all find abhorrent, what makes you think that the average moderate Muslim would?
So with this all said, even if your idea on what Muslims can do held any water, it would be restricted to situations in their countries and would have nothing to do with the West or for that matter international terrorism. Remember, Muslim countries deal with terrorism in their own territories. Asking them to address it like they did the Arab Spring would literally mean that most of the Muslim world would have nothing to do with addressing terrorism, and whomever did, would deal with it on his own land. So... the status quo.