View Poll Results: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

Voters
1321. You may not vote on this poll
  • Absolutely

    358 27.10%
  • No

    571 43.22%
  • Seems childish

    1,112 84.18%
  • Waste of time

    856 64.80%
  • Tell me when and I'll do it for sure

    534 40.42%
  • other - please explain

    311 23.54%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 10 of 24 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 235

Thread: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

  1. #91
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by DA60 View Post
    EXACTLY!

    As expected, instead of looking inward for some of the causes of this terrorism, people choose to look outward, blame others and turn militant.
    Typical ignorant masses reaction.

    Hitler turned average Germans against Jews. I wonder how long it will take western leaders to turn their ignorant citizens against decent Muslims?

    These terrorists are sick f@cks. But the principle reason they are doing what they are doing is probably because of the horrible acts and murders of innocent civilians AND the propping up of horrific regimes the West (led by America) has done over the last 20 years or so.

    And though I condemn any violence against innocent people...I do not blame those in the Middle East ONE LITTLE BIT for despising all things American.
    American-Western actions are killing their children or allowing others to do the same.

    People freak out about a beheading - yet Saudi Arabia does it ALL THE TIME and no one mentions it. This is hypocrisy.

    Yes, terrorists must be stopped and hunted down.

    But blaming it solely on some religious reason is TOTALLY a missing the point.

    America has been bombing/invading/killing anyone they want over the last 20 years...it's just that the friends/families of those that are getting killed are finally fed up and striking back (wrongly) the only way they know how...terrorism.


    If you want the terrorism to stop...stop budding in all around the world where it is none of your business.
    Because trying to kill them all will never work, for every one you kill, you will just turn them into martyrs and make terrorist recruitment that much easier.
    Yeah, they're really showing us!

    In Pakistan school attack, Taliban terrorists kill 145, mostly children - CNN.com
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  2. #92
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,081

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonfly View Post
    What was/is Charlie Hebdo hiding? Please inform us.
    Not hiding perse, they were more like... putting on display. That which they were putting on display was the casual French bigotry, racism and xenophobia towards all of those who aren't entirely French. The same Muslims who they had no problems slaughtering in Algeria, the blacks who they have no problem enslaving for years were the ones they casually attacked in their pages. It is a magazine that gave a voice to the mostly white academic class in France that finds no problem punching down. I won't pretend like they were some beacon for an important form of free speech, they are a racist and xenophobic publication whose entire raison d'Ítre was the offense of other groups. Sure, their freedom of speech should be defended but it's not as if these people will be considered anything but racist and xenophobic a 100 years from now. Sort of like the cartoons I posted.
    Last edited by Hatuey; 01-13-15 at 03:19 PM.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  3. #93
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,715

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by DA60 View Post
    EXACTLY!

    As expected, instead of looking inward for some of the causes of this terrorism, people choose to look outward, blame others and turn militant.
    Typical ignorant masses reaction.

    Hitler turned average Germans against Jews. I wonder how long it will take western leaders to turn their ignorant citizens against decent Muslims?

    These terrorists are sick f@cks. But the principle reason they are doing what they are doing is probably because of the horrible acts and murders of innocent civilians AND the propping up of horrific regimes the West (led by America) has done over the last 20 years or so.

    And though I condemn any violence against innocent people...I do not blame those in the Middle East ONE LITTLE BIT for despising all things American.
    American-Western actions are killing their children or allowing others to do the same.
    People freak out about a beheading - yet Saudi Arabia does it ALL THE TIME and no one mentions it. This is hypocrisy.

    Yes, terrorists must be stopped and hunted down.

    But blaming it solely on some religious reason is TOTALLY a missing the point.

    America has been bombing/invading/killing anyone they want over the last 20 years...it's just that the friends/families of those that are getting killed are finally fed up and striking back (wrongly) the only way they know how...terrorism.


    If you want the terrorism to stop...stop budding in all around the world where it is none of your business.
    Because trying to kill them all will never work, for every one you kill, you will just turn them into martyrs and make terrorist recruitment that much easier.
    Holy ****, are you backing the wrong horse. Blaming Extremist Fundamentalist terrorism ignores global historical reality. The have ALWAYS been out killing and a bombing and it had precisely jack squat to do with the US in the last 20 years, or any other time period for that matter. Muslim Fundamentalists believe in the literal blood and gore translation of the Koran.

    Have you ever asked yourself what butchering a dozen school girls in Indonesia has to do with ME oil? Or entire villages in Africa? Or the attacks on schools that dare teach girls how to read?

  4. #94
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonfly View Post
    In support of all victims of all islamic terrorist actions, should every single media outlet, publication, and private individual start printing/posting/publishing drawings of Muhammed?

    Think about it. If every single person/business/group/corporation with a facebook page, instagram, snap chat, blog, forum, and web page spent a week posting nothing but pictures of Muhammed would it make a statement?

    If every single non-muslim with the means to "protest" in this way banded together and posted pictures, it would number in the billions.

    Would it make any kind of difference? Would it resonate with the Muslim world at all?

    A world-wide grass-roots movement to collectively say "we're not going to submit to terrorist threats" and "we fully support the freedom of speech and freedom of the press/media". Would you participate?

    Is it time for every single non-Muslim to post a cartoon/drawing of Muhammad in a collective gesture of support, and defiance against violence?
    If the media really wanted to show solidarity with Charlie then this is what they should be doing. They should do it every time these animals threaten and or kill someone. This bull**** of showing censored images of Muhammad is nothing more than sucking the dicks of terrorists IE terrorist appeasement.The same rats who censor images of Muhammad would not show the same courtesy to other religions.Heck the animals murdering innocent people over ****ing cartoons would not show any respect to other religions.

    Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?-french-magazines-naked-mohammed-cartoonssm-jpg
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  5. #95
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 01:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    9,868

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    It's predictable at times like this that leftist America-haters will show their true colors. Watch how they run this country and its culture down, and it becomes clear they don't have much more time for America, or for Western Civilization in general, than Muslim jihadists do. It's clear some of them are also driven by lack of nerve--they imagine that if they bow and do as these subhuman jihadist bastards tell them, they will be nice to us.

    For anyone who hasn't read it, I'd again like to recommend an excellent and eye-opening book by Andy McCarthy, "The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America." The "grand jihad" is taken from a phrase in a strategy document written some years ago by one of the many Muslim Brotherhood front groups operating in the U.S. CAIR, though this was not its document, is probably the best known of these fronts. As Secretary of State, one prominent leftist, Hillary "The Belle of Benghazi" Clinton, was heavily involved with various Islamist organizations in efforts to find ways to suppress speech offensive to Muslims. To someone who knows about all that, it's not surprising this President sent only our Ambassador to the recent demonstration in Paris. B. Hussein Obama, in his heart of hearts, probably thinks those smart-mouthed white people at Charlie Hebdo got just what they were asking for.

    Mrs. Clinton also was heavily involved in President Pinocchio's foreign policy misadventures in Egypt and Libya. Her main advisor in engineering the replacement of Hosni Mubarak with the Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Morsi--himself since replaced by Mr. Sisi--was Huma Abedin, the wife of the scandalized exhibitionist Anthony Weiner. Several members of Abedin's family in Egypt had close, longstanding connections with the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic supremacist groups. Just the sort of person I'd expect to see serving a President who has bowed and scraped to the Muslim world ever since he first took office. Mr. Obama has the same sympathetic attitude toward Islamic extremists that most leftists do. He carries on an half-hearted, ineffective campaign against them to look like he's doing something. But in fact by showing weakness to them--our sworn enemies--he has invited another 9/11--or worse.

  6. #96
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 01:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    9,868

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
    If the media really wanted to show solidarity with Charlie then this is what they should be doing. They should do it every time these animals threaten and or kill someone. This bull**** of showing censored images of Muhammad is nothing more than sucking the dicks of terrorists IE terrorist appeasement.The same rats who censor images of Muhammad would not show the same courtesy to other religions.Heck the animals murdering innocent people over ****ing cartoons would not show any respect to other religions.

    Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?-french-magazines-naked-mohammed-cartoonssm-jpg
    I certainly hope you're not suggesting that the jihadists who destroyed those ancient Buddhas that had been carved into the stone in Afghanistan were showing disrespect for any other religion! Since when is firing artillery rounds at ancient religious art anything but a show of tolerance and respect?

  7. #97
    Sage
    Peter King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Netherlands
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:56 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    14,029

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Is sacred, not almost.
    The only thing that makes it almost sacred, it may not incite violence or call for violence, not be racist and it has to be true/based on fact.
    Former military man (and now babysitter of Donald Trump) John Kelly, is a big loud lying empty barrel!

  8. #98
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 01:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    9,868

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    Holy ****, are you backing the wrong horse. Blaming Extremist Fundamentalist terrorism ignores global historical reality. The have ALWAYS been out killing and a bombing and it had precisely jack squat to do with the US in the last 20 years, or any other time period for that matter. Muslim Fundamentalists believe in the literal blood and gore translation of the Koran.

    Have you ever asked yourself what butchering a dozen school girls in Indonesia has to do with ME oil? Or entire villages in Africa? Or the attacks on schools that dare teach girls how to read?
    Please. Don't blasphemers deserve to die? Those dogs who were slaughtered were enemies of the Faith. I find your suggestions that the acts you mention are anything worse than an ardent expression of religious belief to be very offensive. And as I'm sure you'd agree, speech which offends anyone should never be tolerated.

  9. #99
    Sage
    Cephus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    CA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:25 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    29,797

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by spangledbanner View Post
    It is in Australia and most civilized nations. Are you a fan of racist warner bros cartoons or something? You think that the cartoon 'Jungle Bunnies' is an artistic work of creative expression? Then why did America ban these cartoons?

    edit- And isnt France and America encouraging bullying with this freedom propaganda?

    Is it cool for children to draw offensive cartoons of unpopular classmates that they do not like? Can we do that in the workplace now? Is that what you American and French are trying to say? That bullying is cool now? Isnt Charlie Hedbo a bully? His cartoons were designed to be offensive, hurtful and provocative right? So kids that copy his behaviour will be heros? Can children draw cartoons making fun of students that are Muslim? Is that cool in America? Is that what you are trying to say? Well, I disagree and I do not think that French and American society should promote bullying or make heros out of bullies.
    Actually, I'm a big fan of the WWII Warner Bros. cartoons. Thanks for asking. And nobody anywhere has a right not to be offended. People need to grow up, especially, it seems, Australians.
    There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide the world that cannot be achieved more rationally through entirely secular means.

    Blog me! YouTube me! VidMe me!

  10. #100
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Should we flood the world with images of Muhammed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter King View Post
    The only thing that makes it almost sacred, it may not incite violence or call for violence, not be racist and it has to be true/based on fact.
    Free speech always has some regulation with you people.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

Page 10 of 24 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •