Yep. But that IS NOT NECESSARILY discrimination based on race. It could be GPA, experience, and ability. But it could also be, discrimination based on race. One would have to examine the matter to make the determination. That said, your guess, and I most certainly agree with it, is most certainly discrimination made on the basis of race. We both did that. Is that justified? That is the question.
I based ny statement on the fact that International Standardized IQ testing
for various ethnicities reveals Orientals to have average IQs of 110, white
Euro/American average IQs of 100, and African averege IQs 90 and under.
I understand the possibility of WASP contamination of test design, but also
feel that logic, math, art, and basic skills are valid tools for test design. That
being said, a shortcoming in one area of testing may completely ignore an excess
in an area, intentionally or unintentionally, not tested. I don't think IQ testing
deals with emotions, physical advantage, or sensory perception. Also, exceptions
are manifeest in every area, by every race. Knowing these stated facts, if I were a
Human Resource Director in charge of hiring, l would definitely have ethnic prejudices
and they would not be subliminal, but an overt tool of the job. It could be called rascism.
It could be called discrimination. It could be called doing the job.