• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the West place troops on the ground to take out terrorists?

Should the West place troops on the ground to take out terrorists?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 16.7%
  • No

    Votes: 22 73.3%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 3 10.0%

  • Total voters
    30
Are you doubting that groups like ISIL and Al Qaeda exist? Or are those lies?

Did I say they don't exist--just another far-rightist strawman.
Do you agree with basing a war on confirmed lies ?
 
Are you doubting that groups like ISIL and Al Qaeda exist? Or are those lies?

You missed his point.

Our illegal and unprovoked invasion of Iraq created a power vacuum that allowed ISIL and Al Qaeda to infiltrate and flourish.

So...yeah, about 100K innocent men, women, and children died due to our invasion, to the insurrection and our response to it, and to the ongoing violence since the government is still so weak.
 
then let me ask you something: if the united states committed such atrocities, how can you justify stating that we are any different then the terrorists themselves.

We're not doing it out of the blue, we're doing it as the only solution to terrorism. These people cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be convinced that they're wrong, they aren't afraid of dying, their purpose is to convert the world by force to their religion and nothing less is acceptable to them. If we stop bothering them, they won't stop. The only thing that will stop them is the death of every single extremist Muslim on the planet. Before doing that, I'd rather try something a little less drastic. Nothing less drastic than killing their families has been shown to work.
 
Because it isn't hurting the terrorists in that case. It's just killing innocent civilians. Drag the families of the terrorists out in front of the store and put a gun to their heads.

After you have the women, children and babies, out front of the store, weapons to their heads, the terrorists refuse to give up.
Next response is?
 
McVeigh is the face of far right extremist militias--as with Bundy's domestic terrorists and the Branch Davidians .

The Branch Dravidian never a hurt a single person before a bunch of Jack Booted Thugs raided them for non sense reasons, and then murdered them to save their own asses

Do not believe me?

 
He was not a Christian apples and oranges..

His religion doesn't matter. He was a extremist member of a right-wing militia.

And if you really want to talk about religion, take a wild guess what religion has killed the most people in the name of religion throughout human history. Here's a hint - it ain't the Muslims.
 
We're not doing it out of the blue, we're doing it as the only solution to terrorism. These people cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be convinced that they're wrong, they aren't afraid of dying, their purpose is to convert the world by force to their religion and nothing less is acceptable to them. If we stop bothering them, they won't stop. The only thing that will stop them is the death of every single extremist Muslim on the planet. Before doing that, I'd rather try something a little less drastic. Nothing less drastic than killing their families has been shown to work.

Where has killing their families been shown to work.
 
You missed his point.

Our illegal and unprovoked invasion of Iraq created a power vacuum that allowed ISIL and Al Qaeda to infiltrate and flourish.

So...yeah, about 100K innocent men, women, and children died due to our invasion, to the insurrection and our response to it, and to the ongoing violence since the government is still so weak.

It's been going on a lot longer than 2002. What happened might have made it worse, it didn't cause the problem. Certainly it didn't cause those Muslim animals to fly airplanes into buildings prior to that invasion of Iraq.
 
The Branch Dravidian never a hurt a single person before a bunch of Jack Booted Thugs raided them for non sense reasons, and then murdered them to save their own asses

McVeigh took a page out of the same playbook as the Branch Davidians .
 
We're not doing it out of the blue, we're doing it as the only solution to terrorism. These people cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be convinced that they're wrong, they aren't afraid of dying, their purpose is to convert the world by force to their religion and nothing less is acceptable to them. If we stop bothering them, they won't stop. The only thing that will stop them is the death of every single extremist Muslim on the planet. Before doing that, I'd rather try something a little less drastic. Nothing less drastic than killing their families has been shown to work.

i refuse to go down the path of genocide.
 
His religion doesn't matter. He was a extremist member of a right-wing militia.

And if you really want to talk about religion, take a wild guess what religion has killed the most people in the name of religion throughout human history. Here's a hint - it ain't the Muslims.

No he was kicked out of his Militia before OKC.
Of course lets talk about the dark ages and ignore recent events because you are losing the debate.
 
McVeigh took a page out of the same playbook as the Branch Davidians .

Really? How so? The Davidians did not hurt anyone, funny how you did not include the video in your reply...
 
We're not doing it out of the blue, we're doing it as the only solution to terrorism. These people cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be convinced that they're wrong, they aren't afraid of dying, their purpose is to convert the world by force to their religion and nothing less is acceptable to them. If we stop bothering them, they won't stop. The only thing that will stop them is the death of every single extremist Muslim on the planet. Before doing that, I'd rather try something a little less drastic. Nothing less drastic than killing their families has been shown to work.

You're quite wrong. If you were somehow able to suddenly kill every extremist Muslim on the planet, the very act of doing so would radicalize ten times that number overnight.

Ask yourself how many terrorists come from the rich Arab states where there's a high standard of living? Like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and such? And what about the largest Muslim nation on the planet - Indonesia? Yes, they have some problems too, but not so much in relative terms.

There are some terrorist who come from the countries mentioned above, but relatively few. Most of their foot soldiers come from the poor, the disaffected, the downtrodden. And if you'll think about it, that's how we get a lot of people in our own armed forces - the poor, downtrodden, and disaffected. Don't tell me this isn't the case - been there, done that, got the retired AFID in my wallet.

You will never, ever, EVER get rid of terrorism. Ever. But if you want to minimize it, help bring their nations up to first-world status...and all of a sudden the hordes of radicals becomes a trickle. That's how it's done...and short of worldwide genocide, the ONLY way it can be done.
 
We're not doing it out of the blue, we're doing it as the only solution to terrorism. These people cannot be reasoned with, they cannot be convinced that they're wrong, they aren't afraid of dying, their purpose is to convert the world by force to their religion and nothing less is acceptable to them. If we stop bothering them, they won't stop. The only thing that will stop them is the death of every single extremist Muslim on the planet. Before doing that, I'd rather try something a little less drastic. Nothing less drastic than killing their families has been shown to work.

Where has killing their families been shown to work.

Where has it been tried? Let's find out.

First you state it has been shown to work, now it is???????????????????????? what - Where has it been tried?
So what is it?
 
Because we did not start this, They did..

Depends on whom you ask. For instance, who was it that deposed the democratically-elected president of Iraq and installed the Shah in his place?

That was us.

It was because they were about to nationalize the oil production, and our oil companies didn't like that.

Tell me, if you lived in a nation whose democratically-elected president was overthrown by another nation which put a despot in the seat of power instead, what would you think about that other nation?
 
Back
Top Bottom