Requirement for what? Did I say something had to be qualified? Last time I checked conservatives almost never waste a chance to stick it to Obama, so if he can't even get them to agree with him on this then you can probably bet he's pretty far of course.
Do you have an actual argument or were you just here to insert lazy one liners?
Perhaps you haven't noticed that the polls have been corrupted by outside parties. In any case, agreement with any stated position isn't a requirement for posting on this site. Agreement or disagreement does not discredit the stated position, and since you brought it up, agreement or disagreement isn't an argument at all. It's a declarative statement devoid of content.
When the people from that land have already decided we are at war and attacked us-leaving them be is indeed appeasement. I hear from some libertarians that they would be all about defense and that an attack would be met with force-but then we get people like Ron Paul who have a naive and utopian view-who think perhaps that electing a libertarian will somehow improve things-in the mean time we will be attacked with no substantive response-and as that libertarian is voted out his/her polices will go with them. Radical islamists will hate us the entire time-and the only thing that will have changed is 4 years of soft responses-in other words a cue for our enemies to attack (much like word powers and terrorists are emboldened under weak leaders like Obama).
We did respond with force after 9/11. We killed and captured those who were responsible for it. Now we are just in a cycle of killing people who do not agree with our views.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals."
- Mark Twain