Kinda seems like you did. Anyway....
Only an utter fool would ignore how:
• Almost all of the protests in NYC have been peaceful
• Neither Sharpton, nor Di Blasio, nor Garner's family, or any major public figure has in any way suggested assaulting police officers
• Brinsley shot his ex-girlfriend in Baltimore -- is that also Sharpton's fault?
• Brinsley was not political, was not associated with any political activism or political groups, and wasn't motivated by politics
• Brinsley was probably going to murder someone, some day, and his choice of victims doesn't have any real political significance
Go ahead, explain why he shot his girlfriend first. Explain why he didn't go to Staten Island, which is where Garner was killed. Why he didn't try to track down Officer Pantaleo, who put Garner in a choke hold. How he was inspired by Sharpton, who
wasn't advocating violence. How he was inspired by Garner's family, who
wasn't advocating violence either. How tens of thousands of peaceful protestors, who are protesting
against the illegitimate use of violence, pushed someone to shoot two cops.
I mean, really, how is this supposed to work? Did he
watch a video of a bunch of drunken bros in Santa outfits yelling at police brutality protestors, and become overwhelmed with rage? Maybe he
listened to some Judas Priest before committing suicide? Maybe
he played too many video games? No wait, I've got it. He watched
The Matrix one time too many. Keanu Reeves now has blood on his hands!
Last week, a man named Bradley Stone shot 6 people in Philadelphia. Which Social Justice Warriors are to blame for this? Who has blood on their hands for Stone's actions?
Or maybe... just maybe... Brinley was mentally disturbed, it was just a matter of time before he shot someone, and his choice of victims had no actual political purpose, and it's absurd to treat it that way. Just a thought.